ipgrade is planned for next Thursday. I have read the
instructions in docs.fedoraproject.org/.. <http://docs.fedoraproject.org/..>..
I see that dnf is getting a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3 questions.
1. Before the upgrade.
"Proper preparation prevents piss-poor perfo
On 4/5/25 1:22 AM, Barry wrote:
On 4 Apr 2025, at 23:12, home user via users
wrote:
I don't recall customizing dnf in the past several years. The workstation is
12 years old; I don't recall if I did any dnf or yum customization that far
back.
I was not thinking of customising dnf, I wa
e read the instructions in docs.fedoraproject.org/ I
> see that dnf is getting a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3
> questions.
>
> 1. Before the upgrade.
>
"Proper preparation prevents piss-poor performance"
Make a backup of important files and check that t
> On 4 Apr 2025, at 23:12, home user via users
> wrote:
>
> I don't recall customizing dnf in the past several years. The workstation is
> 12 years old; I don't recall if I did any dnf or yum customization that far
> back.
I was not thinking of customising dnf, I was thinking of customisin
d the instructions in docs.fedoraproject.org/ I see that dnf is getting
a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3 questions.
1. Before the upgrade.
Before doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download...") of upgrade
proper, do I need to do anything beyond what is stated in the i
docs.fedoraproject.org/ I see that dnf is
> getting a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3 questions.
>
> 1. Before the upgrade.
> Before doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download...") of upgrade
> proper, do I need to do anything beyond what is state
On 4/4/25 10:53 AM, Barry wrote:
On 4 Apr 2025, at 17:29, home user via users
wrote:
configuration file changes?
If you drop-in config then nothing to do usually.
But if you have the full conf file then check for new options you may need to
tune.
I don't recall customizing dnf in the
ns in docs.fedoraproject.org/ I see that dnf is getting
a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3 questions.
1. Before the upgrade.
Before doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download...") of upgrade
proper, do I need to do anything beyond what is stated in the instructions?
> On 4 Apr 2025, at 17:29, home user via users
> wrote:
>
> configuration file changes?
If you drop-in config then nothing to do usually.
But if you have the full conf file then check for new options you may need to
tune.
Barry
--
___
users mai
ons in docs.fedoraproject.org/ I see that dnf is
> getting a major upgrade from dnf4 to dnf5. I have 3 questions.
>
> 1. Before the upgrade.
> Before doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download...") of upgrade
> proper, do I need to do anything beyond what is
have 3 questions.
1. Before the upgrade.
Before doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download...") of upgrade
proper, do I need to do anything beyond what is stated in the instructions?
2. During the upgrade.
After doing the first step ("dnf system-upgrade download..."
(responding to both Samuel and Jonathan)
(Samuel)
There's no lockin for the filesystem. Even Fedora server uses a different
default than Fedora workstation.
But either way, you can select whichever filesystem you want at installation.
But I must say that I am
loving the subvolume options of
On Jan 20, 2025, at 23:50, home user via users
wrote:
>
> Am I the only one sensing a business inconsistency in what Fedora and Redhat
> are doing? Since Fedora is the upstream for RHEL, and RHEL forks off Fedora,
> I would think that they would have the same default file system unless Red
>
On 1/20/25 8:49 PM, home user via users wrote:
I'm almost certain that I'll want a dual-boot system on the new
workstation: Fedora + one other t.b.d. Linux distribution. In that
situation, does it matter which file system I'll use? Also, am I
correct in assuming that file system choice do not
(responding to Patrick, George, and Samuel)
Thank-you for your responses.
I'm almost certain that I'll want a dual-boot system on the new workstation:
Fedora + one other t.b.d. Linux distribution. In that situation, does it
matter which file system I'll use? Also, am I correct in assuming th
On 1/20/25 3:37 PM, George N. White III wrote:
filesystems. The advantages of btrfs are not "free" -- btrfs requires
maintenance and is
not properly supported by legacy tools (df).
I still disagree with the "required maintenance" thing and "df" works
well enough for almost all purposes.
--
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:28 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 13:18 -0700, home user via users wrote:
> > So Red Hat has abandoned btrfs, XFS is the default. Fedora is upstream for
> > RHEL, so...
> > * Why is btrfs still default for Fedora?
>
I'm not party to RHEL's reas
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 13:18 -0700, home user via users wrote:
> So Red Hat has abandoned btrfs, XFS is the default. Fedora is upstream for
> RHEL, so...
> * Why is btrfs still default for Fedora?
IIRC Fedora adopted BTRFS as the standard for Workstation *after*
RedHat had decided not to use it f
7;s currently at 9.
What is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise 9?
I genuinely don't mean this as snark, but is there any reason you haven't just
STFW-ed [1] this?
I'm trying to plan for a new workstation. Robin's post brought questions to
mind. I did sear
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 19:20, home user via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> For Red Hat Enterprise, all I've found on the internet is negative (it
> does not use...), and nothing more recent that version 8. But it's
> currently at 9.
> What is the default file system in Red Hat En
On 1/20/25 11:09 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 1/20/25 1:04 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
...
I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past and have
to regain my trust.
...
The Btrfs file system received numerous updates
On 1/20/25 1:04 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
...
I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past
and have to regain my trust.
...
The Btrfs file system received numerous updates from the upstream in
Red Hat Enterprise Linux versi
On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
...
I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past and have
to regain my trust.
...
The Btrfs file system received numerous updates from the upstream in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux versions 6.0 through 6.6
and 7.0 through 7.4. It will r
On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 08:34 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
> Note the quotes have been re-ordered for clarity
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > # efibootmgr
> > BootCurrent: 0001
> [...]
> > Boot0001* Fedora HD(1,GPT,8a303a03-0b91-453a-8555-
> > f9627c261f65,0
Note the quotes have been re-ordered for clarity
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 6:32 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> # efibootmgr
> BootCurrent: 0001
[...]
> Boot0001* Fedora
> HD(1,GPT,8a303a03-0b91-453a-8555-f9627c261f65,0x800,0x12c000)/\EFI\fedora\shimx64.efi424f
> # blkid
[...]
> /dev/
On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 09:21 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
> If you clone a disk in a raw mode, the blkid's are the same on both
> devices, and since the boot process looks for the blkid to load, it
> would be using the first device it sees.
>
I didn't clone it in raw mode, and t
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 23:02 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've cloned my existing SSD onto a new NVMe drive, copying EFI
> (vfat),
> /boot (ext4) and root+/home (BTRFS with /home subvolume) partitions
> and
> editing /etc/fstab appropriately.
>
> However I hav
On 28 Jul 2024 at 21:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 21:57:04 -0700
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Samuel Sieb
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
On 7/28/24 7:00 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 28 Jul 2024 at 17:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:54:13 -0700
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Samuel Sieb
Send reply to
On 28 Jul 2024 at 17:54, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:54:13 -0700
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Samuel Sieb
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
On 7/28/24 4:21 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
On 28 Jul 2024 at 18:19, Go Canes wrote:
From: Go Canes
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:19:38 -0400
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: Community support for Fedora users
On 28 Jul 2024 at 18:19, Go Canes wrote:
From: Go Canes
Date sent: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:19:38 -0400
Subject:Re: NVMe questions
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 5:42 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> I tried disabling the SSD (in the bootable drives list). It made no
> difference.
Just to be clear - did you disable the drive or just remove it from
the bootable list? What we want to do here is prevent the BIOS from
reading from the
On Sat, 2024-07-27 at 20:04 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 4:36 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > However none of the UUIDs seen by efibootmgr correspond to anything
> > on
> > any of the drives.
>
> Re-read my reply. Both of the efibootmgr variables *do* correspond
> to
> ex
On Sat, 2024-07-27 at 19:40 -0600, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
> If you give the FAT file system a volume name (i.e. file system label),
> be sure to name it something other than EFI. That can trigger a bug in
> some firmwares (due to the volume name matching the EFI directory name)
> that will cause
On 7/27/24 03:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Model: WD_BLACK SN770 2TB (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End SizeFile system NameFlags
1 1049kB 269MB 268MB fat32EFI msft
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 4:36 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> However none of the UUIDs seen by efibootmgr correspond to anything on
> any of the drives.
Re-read my reply. Both of the efibootmgr variables *do* correspond to
existing UUIDs.
> > Can you disable the SSD in "BIOS"?
> Yes, but the NV
On Sat, 2024-07-27 at 15:47 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
> What I'm not sure of is the "1" in "HD(1,GPT,[...]" - I am thinking
> it
> refers to the first "hard disk", which if I am right, means at least
> one of them is pointing to the correct uuid, but on the wrong disk.
>
However none of the UUIDs se
I think quoting levels are getting messed up
> $ efibootmgr
> BootCurrent: 0001
> Timeout: 1 seconds
> BootOrder: 0001,0002
> Boot0001* Fedora
> HD(1,GPT,8a303a03-0b91-453a-8555-f9627c261f65,0x800,0x12c000)/\EFI\fedora\shimx64.efi424f
> Boot0002* Fedora
> HD(1,GPT,e7207d2d-
On Sat, 2024-07-27 at 15:17 +0200, Lukas Middendorf wrote:
> On 27/07/2024 14:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 19:00 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
> > > - EFI needs a variable that points to the desired disk and the
> > > desired
> > > partition on that disk
> > > - the UUID from t
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 8:57 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
[...]
> None of those numbers correspond to any of my UUIDs:
[followed by lsblk -fs]
Use "blkid" - it will show the UUID of the device and the PARTUUID of
the partition for all your disks.
--
_
On 27/07/2024 14:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 19:00 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
- EFI needs a variable that points to the desired disk and the
desired
partition on that disk
- the UUID from the EFI variable needs to match the PARTUUID for the
EFI partition on the desired disk
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 19:00 -0400, Go Canes wrote:
> - EFI needs a variable that points to the desired disk and the
> desired
> partition on that disk
> - the UUID from the EFI variable needs to match the PARTUUID for the
> EFI partition on the desired disk
> - the directory from the EFI var shou
On Sat, 2024-07-27 at 11:59 +0200, Lukas Middendorf wrote:
> On 27/07/2024 11:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Model: WD_BLACK SN770 2TB (nvme)
> > Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 2000GB
> > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> > Partition Table: gpt
> > Disk Flags:
> >
> > Number Start End Siz
On 27/07/2024 11:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Model: WD_BLACK SN770 2TB (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End SizeFile system NameFlags
1 1049kB 269MB 268MB fat32EFI m
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 18:33 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan composed on 2024-07-26 23:02 (UTC+0100):
>
> > I ran dracut with the
> > UUID of the appropriate root NVMe partition but it made no
> > difference.
> > What am I missing here?
>
> What did you do to ensure NVME support is
On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 17:32 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Try posting the output of "sudo parted --list", for my nvme boot
> drive it
> looks like this:
>
> Model: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB (nvme)
> Disk /dev/nvme1n1: 500GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: gpt
> D
> > editing /etc/fstab appropriately.
> >
> > However I have a couple of questions:
> >
> > 1) I'm puzzled that the NVMe drive (a 2TB WD Black) doesn't appear
> > as
> > bootable in the UEFI screen. This is a new MSI motherboard with 2
> > M
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:03 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> I've cloned my existing SSD onto a new NVMe drive, copying EFI (vfat),
> /boot (ext4) and root+/home (BTRFS with /home subvolume) partitions and
> editing /etc/fstab appropriately.
>
> However I have a cou
Try posting the output of "sudo parted --list", for my nvme boot drive it
looks like this:
Model: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme1n1: 500GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End SizeFile system Name
Patrick O'Callaghan composed on 2024-07-26 23:02 (UTC+0100):
> I ran dracut with the
> UUID of the appropriate root NVMe partition but it made no difference.
> What am I missing here?
What did you do to ensure NVME support is included in the new initramfs?
--
Evolution as taught in public school
Once upon a time, Mike Wright said:
> Which tool did you use to partition the drive? For UEFI I believe
> you have to use gparted or gfdisk.
That's not true, I think most if not all of the commonly-used tools can
partition a drive compatible with UEFI. The partition table needs to be
GPT, and s
On 7/26/24 15:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've cloned my existing SSD onto a new NVMe drive, copying EFI (vfat),
/boot (ext4) and root+/home (BTRFS with /home subvolume) partitions and
editing /etc/fstab appropriately.
However I have a couple of questions:
1) I'm puzzled that
I've cloned my existing SSD onto a new NVMe drive, copying EFI (vfat),
/boot (ext4) and root+/home (BTRFS with /home subvolume) partitions and
editing /etc/fstab appropriately.
However I have a couple of questions:
1) I'm puzzled that the NVMe drive (a 2TB WD Black) doesn't appear
Any takes on this, guys?
Thanks
Frank
On 2024-03-23 11:30, Frank Bures wrote:
Hi,
I have several separate file systems, amongst them /home on btrfs and media
depository /archives on xfs (RAID-5).
I am running Win11 guest in QEMU on F39 host. I installed winfsp in the
guest and I can acces
Hi,
I have several separate file systems, amongst them /home on btrfs and media
depository /archives on xfs (RAID-5).
I am running Win11 guest in QEMU on F39 host. I installed winfsp in the
guest and I can access my /home in Win11 guest.
However, if I "Add Hardware" in Virtual HW details a
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:36:31 -0400
Tom Rivers wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> There are two things that I have noticed lately when performing
> upgrades using cockpit:
>
> 1) When viewing the update log in real time, the display no longer
> automatically scrolls to show new entries.
>
> 2) The "Ve
Good morning,
There are two things that I have noticed lately when performing upgrades
using cockpit:
1) When viewing the update log in real time, the display no longer
automatically scrolls to show new entries.
2) The "Verifying" line of text above the progress indicator seems to be
missi
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 3:33 PM home user wrote:
> I have a few minutes to come back to this.
>
> It seems to me that the font tools do not have a minor bug. Rather, they
> were probably fine years ago when fonts were fewer and generally
> simpler. Now there are more fonts, and they seem to be mo
Type 1" and which are not?
I was hoping that somewhere in its website, Fedora has a list of what
comes with it by default. I haven't found one, and no one mentioned
one. Another possible solution would be a new, more powerful font tool.
See my post to the "font tools (was &quo
I have a few minutes to come back to this.
It seems to me that the font tools do not have a minor bug. Rather, they
were probably fine years ago when fonts were fewer and generally
simpler. Now there are more fonts, and they seem to be more
complicated. So either the font tools need major en
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:14 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> A font viewer should only use the system font folders and any modern
> font viewer will use fontconfig, which won't be looking in random
> directories.
>
The fontconfig system has a well defined way to configure the directories
it searches,
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:03 PM home user wrote:
[...]
> 1. What fonts are by default automatically installed by Fedora (whether
> by a new install or by "dnf system-upgrade"? Equivalently, which of the
> fonts on my work station were put there by Fedora itself, and which were
> installed by oth
On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 22:14 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> A font viewer should only use the system font folders and any modern
> font viewer will use fontconfig, which won't be looking in random
> directories.
It's not really random directories, though. There's the everyone's
fonts in a system lo
On 5/24/22 19:39, Tim via users wrote:
Tim: [re duplicates of some fonts]
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.otf
/usr/share/fonts/urw
On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 21:01 -0600, home user wrote:
> 1. What fonts are by default automatically installed by Fedora
> (whether by a new install or by "dnf system-upgrade"? Equivalently,
> which of the fonts on my work station were put there by Fedora
> itself, and which were installed by other pa
On 5/13/22 10:23 AM, home user wrote:
On 5/10/22 9:21 AM, home user wrote:
I'd like to suspend this thread for a few days while I go to the
LibreOffice community with a few LibreOffice-specific questions.
thanks,
Bill.
Back to this.
According to the LibreOffice community, LibreO
Tim: [re duplicates of some fonts]
>> That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
>>
>> [tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
>> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
>> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.otf
>> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold
On 5/24/22 1:28 PM, home user wrote:
On 5/23/22 10:09 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/
On 5/24/22 4:37 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/24/22 12:41, home user wrote:
On 5/24/22 12:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/23/22 22:45, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
[... snip ...]
I don't see the problem, but if you really have a problem with how th
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 1:18 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
> > are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
>
> That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
>
> [tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base3
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM home user wrote:
> On 5/24/22 12:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 5/23/22 22:45, Tim via users wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>> You're not seeing the whole name. If you click on them, you'll see
> >>> they are different. Reg
On 5/24/22 12:41, home user wrote:
On 5/24/22 12:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/23/22 22:45, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You're not seeing the whole name. If you click on them, you'll see
they are different. Regular and 3 types of condensed.
T
On 5/23/22 21:09, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
/u
On 5/24/22 12:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/23/22 22:45, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You're not seeing the whole name. If you click on them, you'll see
they are different. Regular and 3 types of condensed.
That's how I knew they were 4 differe
On 5/23/22 10:09 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
On 5/23/22 22:45, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You're not seeing the whole name. If you click on them, you'll see
they are different. Regular and 3 types of condensed.
Terrible GUI design if it doesn't give you some indication that the
name's bee
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You're not seeing the whole name. If you click on them, you'll see
> they are different. Regular and 3 types of condensed.
Terrible GUI design if it doesn't give you some indication that the
name's been truncated. Are users supposed to aro
On 5/23/22 13:05, home user wrote:
notice 4 fonts called "Noto Sans". They are different from each other.
Notice 4 fonts called "Noto Sans, Bold". They are different from each
other. There are other examples. This is only my opinion, but they
should have different names. Is the problem in
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
> are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bo
(Fedora 35)
In the original post of the "font longevity questions/", I said:
> By the way, why do so many fonts show up twice
> in the font selection tools?
First, the only fonts I recall installing myself are the "Nimbus Roman
No9 L" fonts.
The tools are (in gno
On 5/19/22 20:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/19/22 06:12, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 5/19/22 01:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/17/22 21:16, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not
have libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
On 5/19/22 06:12, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 5/19/22 01:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/17/22 21:16, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
Tried manual install on F35 system
s
On Wed, 18 May 2022 22:32:49 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> It's a common convention used in the rpm packaging to indicate what
> you're needing instead of specifying a specific package. The
> required "library" (or whatever) could move to another package and it
> wouldn't matter. But it's just as
On 5/19/22 01:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/17/22 21:16, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
Tried manual install on F35 system
sudo dnf install libreoffice-base libreoffice-math
On 5/18/22 07:31, stan via users wrote:
Caveat: I don't understand the rpm package naming convention with
parentheses, like mvn(com.ongres.scram:client). They don't work on the
command line without escaping the parens, and I'm not sure what
information they are conveying. The explanation of thi
On 5/17/22 21:16, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
Tried manual install on F35 system
sudo dnf install libreoffice-base libreoffice-math
and got this strange result
Error:
Pr
On 5/18/22 10:31, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2022 00:16:12 -0400
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
Tried manual install on F35 system
sudo dnf install libreoffice-ba
On Wed, 18 May 2022 00:16:12 -0400
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
> libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
>
> Tried manual install on F35 system
>
> sudo dnf install libreoffice-base libreoffice-math
>
> and g
Followed the thread on libreoffice-base and noted that I did not have
libreoffice-base and libreoffice-math installed.
Tried manual install on F35 system
sudo dnf install libreoffice-base libreoffice-math
and got this strange result
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- package libreoffice-
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:07 PM George N. White III wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:35 PM Tom Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:21 AM home user wrote:
>> >
>> > Good morning,
>> >
>> > I have about 240 microsoft office word 2010 documents, all 9+ years old,
..
>> Backup a
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 07:42 -0600, James Szinger wrote:
> Try markdown if LaTeX is too complicated. Markdown is a simple,
> text-based markup language that can be automatically converted to
> other formats, including HTML, LaTeX, PDF, and MS Word.
I may have another look at these. I don't partic
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 07:42 -0600, James Szinger wrote:
> I don’t grok word processors. Plain text is just as good for simple
> documents and WYSIWYG interferes with complicated formatting. Many
> of the Word files I get from my colleagues are a mess.
To paraphrase Brian Kernighan:
WYSIWYG m
On Sat, 14 May 2022 11:21:32 +0930
Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 07:48 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> I'd briefly looked at LaTex, decided it was more pain that is worth
> for *me* to learn, but lots of people provide that same advice.
> Having been down the road, before, of u
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 11:21 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> I'd briefly looked at LaTex, decided it was more pain that is worth
> for *me* to learn, but lots of people provide that same advice.
> Having been down the road, before, of using proprietary word proc doc
> formats that couldn't be used el
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:23 -0600, home user wrote:
>> By the way, why do so many fonts show up twice in the font
>> selection tools?
I can't say I've noticed that, but I haven't installed lots of fonts
recently. It's many years since I went on a font binge. I can think
of a few things:
The top
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 07:48 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> LaTeX and ConTeXt source files are plain text, and with markup is
> intended to convey structure. The choices for fonts and
> "decorations" are provided in "styles". Publishers often provide
> their own styles to authors.
That's ho
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:35 PM Tom Mitchell
wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:21 AM home user wrote:
> >
> > Good morning,
> >
> > I have about 240 microsoft office word 2010 documents, all 9+ years old,
> > that I'm converting to LibreOffice Writer in Fedora-35. I'm having to
> > do this in
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:21 AM home user wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> I have about 240 microsoft office word 2010 documents, all 9+ years old,
> that I'm converting to LibreOffice Writer in Fedora-35. I'm having to
> do this in 3 steps
Add a 4th step to your checklist.
Backup and transfer the
On 5/10/22 9:21 AM, home user wrote:
I'd like to suspend this thread for a few days while I go to the
LibreOffice community with a few LibreOffice-specific questions.
thanks,
Bill.
Good morning,
I have about 240 microsoft office word 2010 documents, all 9+ years old,
that I'm
1 - 100 of 728 matches
Mail list logo
