On 5/23/22 10:09 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 14:05 -0600, home user wrote:
are some fonts actually on my work station twice?
That can happen. Different things may provide those fonts.
[tim@rocky ~]$ locate NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.otf
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.otf
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35/NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1
/usr/share/ghostscript/Resource/Font/NimbusMonoPS-Bold
/usr/share/ghostscript/Resource/Font/NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic
[... snip ...]
This has me believing that we need (changes to?) policies and standards.
Those "different things" should not add a font unless...
1. the font is not already installed;
.OR.
2. the font already on the system is a proper subset of the font that
the "different thing" wants to install;
.OR.
3. the font that the "different thing" wants to install is fixing glyphs
documented as broken in the font already on the system.
If #2 and/or #3 is the case, then the "different thing" should not
replace the old version of the font with its version unless the
sys.admin. clearly, specifically, directly approves.
Question:
How do I propose/submit a policy addition or change? (presumably not by
submitting a bug!)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
