Today's update (on F41) included a version of grub2 that fixed this issue.
Thank you to all those who contributed to fixing it!
```
...
Upgrade grub2-common-1:2.12-20.fc41.noarch Dependency updates
Upgrade grub2-tools-minimal-1:2.12-20.fc41.x86_64 Dependency update
I got in contact with a member of the rehat development team about this issue
and they kindly responded with the below, quote:
> For the issue you mentioned, we are working on it and for the time being we
> will drop the culprit patch. Issue has been reported not just by fedora but
> by the aar
9 also segmentation faults if it is
executed.
That if block is trying to determine the partition type for all
unmounted partitions that can be seen on the pc (I have 5 ntfs
partitions on my machine and if I mount the 3 partitions I want to be
able to access the segmentation fault only occurs tw
On 8 Mar 2025 at 23:21, Camina Shell via users wrote:
Subject:Re: getting core dump with grub2-mkconfig on
systems with windows7
partitions?? (No windows menu entry?)
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 23:21:29
Great findings! I may give it a go... I'm deciding whether or not to just purge
the W11 volume as I don't use it anyway.
That said, I've been hunting down what changes, and been looking at the commits
to the grub area.
Only found some nice security updates but nothing so far as to shine light on
On 9 Mar 2025 at 5:37, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
To: Community support for Fedora users
Date sent: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 05:37:13 +1000
Subject:Re: getting core dump with grub2-mkconfig on
systems with windows7
partitions
On 8 Mar 2025 at 13:53, Camina Shell via users wrote:
Subject:Re: getting core dump with grub2-mkconfig on
systems with windows7
partitions??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:53:50 -
Send reply to
On 8 Mar 2025 at 13:53, Camina Shell via users wrote:
Subject:Re: getting core dump with grub2-mkconfig on
systems with windows7
partitions??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:53:50 -
Send reply to
Running os-prober on its own also reveals this seg fault.
❯ sudo os-prober
/dev/nvme2n1p1@/efi/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi:Windows Boot Manager:Windows:efi
/usr/libexec/os-probes/50mounted-tests: line 186: 224295 Segmentation fault
(core dumped) grub2-mount "$partition" "$tmpmnt" 2> /dev/nul
Also updated F41 Workstation yesterday (which is a W11 dual-boot setup).
I think the issue is not with the tests file but with grub2-mount, which was
likely changed in the update.
The update may have some vuln patches and perhaps some regressions. Trying to
find out.
Action Package
Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Running the command see these lines? But line 186 in
> 50mounted-tests is just a "fi" line??
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> Generating grub configuration file ...
I see this aswell during homebrewed kernel install.
Box has a second disk with win10 (first
On 8 Mar 2025 at 10:48, Stephen Morris wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 10:48:46 +1100
Subject:Re: getting core dump with grub2-mkconfig on
systems with windows7
partitions??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From
On 8/3/25 06:55, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Running the command see these lines? But line 186 in
50mounted-tests is just a "fi" line??
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub configuration file ...
/usr/libexec/os-probes/50mounted-tests: line 186: 1820513
Segmentation
Running the command see these lines? But line 186 in
50mounted-tests is just a "fi" line??
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub configuration file ...
/usr/libexec/os-probes/50mounted-tests: line 186: 1820513
Segmentation fault (core dumped) grub2-mount "$partition"
"$t
On 12/4/24 4:53 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 12/4/24 4:09 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount
On 12/4/24 4:09 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
If you
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
If you are running KDE, check in System->Connec
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:26 AM Klaus-Peter Schrage via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
I have checked/rechecked three times:
> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg with flag "--root-dev-only": grub goes to
> prompt, $prefix is obviously not set.
> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg wi
Am 21.04.24 um 18:34 schrieb Go Canes:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:15 PM Klaus-Peter Schrage via users
wrote:
/boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg:
search --no-floppy --root-dev-only --fs-uuid --set=dev
206c0b5f-eddf-42e8-96f1-e666c5635cd0
set prefix=($dev)/grub2
export $prefix
Klaus-Peter Schrage composed on 2024-04-21 18:15 (UTC+0200):
...
It really doesn't take much to load a kernel and initrd. All my EFI PCs have
only one Grub installation, even though there are upwards of 12 distros
installed on each PC, no VMs. One of the latest updated hosts this:
menuentry "Fed
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:15 PM Klaus-Peter Schrage via users
wrote:
>
> Am 20.04.24 um 23:16 schrieb George N. White III:
> > I assume you can still boot with manual grub commands.
> Yes, linux ..., initrd ..., boot
> or: >configfile (hd0,1)/grub2/grub.cfg
> which immediately brings back the gru
Am 20.04.24 um 23:16 schrieb George N. White III:
I assume you can still boot with manual grub commands.
Yes, linux ..., initrd ..., boot
or: >configfile (hd0,1)/grub2/grub.cfg
which immediately brings back the grub menu.
Retrace your steps and double check UUID's, other typos, and
misplaced q
Joe Zeff:
>> In all the years I've been using Linux, I've never yet run across a .pdf
>> file that Linux's default viewer couldn't read. What is it about those
>> files that requires Windows to read?
George N. White III:
> a) fillable forms that explicitly say they must be completed using Windows
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 6:43 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 04/20/2024 03:16 PM, George N. White III wrote:
> > In preparation for converting my dual boot Win10+Fedora system
> > to Fedora only, I needed to expand the Win11 partition on another
> > dual boot system because some "mission critical" Adobe
On 04/20/2024 03:16 PM, George N. White III wrote:
In preparation for converting my dual boot Win10+Fedora system
to Fedora only, I needed to expand the Win11 partition on another
dual boot system because some "mission critical" Adobe PDF documents
require Windows.
In all the years I've been us
all gpt). I was able to free a third
> harddisk (ssd) and copied the linux partitions boot, root and home over
> to the new disk, where they now reside as /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2
> and /dev/sda3.
>
In preparation for converting my dual boot Win10+Fedora system
to Fedora only, I needed to ex
find out thing (and nearly always
got there), but now I am stuck.
I seem to recall that you duplicated the UUID's of the original
partitions. If so, did you change them after you had moved the
data? If not, you have 2 partitions with the same UUID, and how is
grub s
be a good idea anyway after all those years of
>> system-upgrade). Things that matter to me (home partition, VMs) are all
>> stored on other devices anyway.
>> Usually I want to find out thing (and nearly always got there), but now
>> I am stuck.
>
>I seem to recall that yo
other devices anyway.
Usually I want to find out thing (and nearly always got there), but now
I am stuck.
I seem to recall that you duplicated the UUID's of the original
partitions. If so, did you change them after you had moved the data? If
not, you have 2 partitions with the same UUID, and h
Am 19.04.24 um 16:58 schrieb Go Canes:
The basic process is EFI is using its variables (which you can examine
with efibootmgr) to find a device and the file on the device to use
for the boot. That should be on the *.efi files in
/boot/efi/EFI/fedora/. That in term should load grub2, which will
4ccc6ad8789c,0x24fc9800,0x32000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIM.EFI424f
> Windows Boot Manager
>
> HD(1,GPT,1ca6f5ea-cbea-11e9-a525-4ccc6ad8789c,0x800,0x24c6)/\EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi424f
>
> And I found, that two partitions (EFI, Windows) on my third harddisk
> have the same
). I was able to free a third
harddisk (ssd) and copied the linux partitions boot, root and home over
to the new disk, where they now reside as /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2
and /dev/sda3.
I left the efi-partition on the disk /dev/sdc together with Windows 11.
As in /etc/fstab all partitions are identified by
I424f
Windows Boot Manager
HD(1,GPT,1ca6f5ea-cbea-11e9-a525-4ccc6ad8789c,0x800,0x24c6)/\EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi424f
And I found, that two partitions (EFI, Windows) on my third harddisk
have the same PARUUID:
/dev/sdc1: LABEL="WIN" BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID=&q
uff tomorrow, although I had already checked
> that gparted really did not change UUIDs when moving partitions around.
> And as I said, I can get into Fedora after fiddling with the Grub
> commandline.
Make sure you are looking at the correct UUIDs. Each partition will
have a UUID and a P
gt; harddisk (ssd) and copied the linux partitions boot, root and home over
> to the new disk, where they now reside as /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2
> and /dev/sda3.
> I left the efi-partition on the disk /dev/sdc together with Windows 11.
> As in /etc/fstab all partitions are identified by their
Thanks for your quick reply!
I faintly remembered the dracut thing, so I tried that first - but it
didn't help.
I will look into the UUID stuff tomorrow, although I had already checked
that gparted really did not change UUIDs when moving partitions around.
And as I said, I can get into F
racut" for commands to just
regenerate a single initramfs]
As I recall at least one of the above things has tripped me up in the
past when moving disks/partitions around.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
After many years of maintaing dual boot setups (Fedora/Windows) my
harddisk layout got a bit confusing: Linux and Windows partition were
scattered on mainly two harddisks (all gpt). I was able to free a third
harddisk (ssd) and copied the linux partitions boot, root and home over
to the new disk
To summarize.
I can boot if I comment the encrypted partitions in the /etc/fstab.
The boot process is stopped when I uncomment these partitions.
The boot process seems waiting for the paraphrase, except that it does not
offer me the option to enter this paraphrase.
The /etc/crypttab has been set
On Fri Jul22'22 05:19:35PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> From: Patrick Dupre
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:19:35 +0200
> To: fedora
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: grub encrypted partitions
>
> Hello,
>
> I reinstalled my distribution.
> I
Hello,
I reinstalled my distribution.
I made a custom installation
but I was not unable to choose my encrypted partition for the boot.
Now, after that I choose the OS for the boot, the
boot procedure does not offer me the option of entering my
paraphrase.
How can I fix this issue ?
Thank
=
Hello,
I have 2 encrypted partition taht I cannot mount
This what was in my fstab (before it was working)
/dev/mapper/luks-f39f1b9a-0060-4424-a574-9cbd02befd2f /home ext4
defaults,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 1 2
/dev/mapper/luks-7be6339d-b708-4185-bb94-53b732a4ab13 /home_ext ext4
defaults,x-s
On 5/23/22 22:41, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:30 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If they are unused, you don't need to use single-user mode. Just
run fdisk on the cli or gparted or Gnome disks in the gui. Delete
all the unused partitions and create a new one with the free
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:30 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> If they are unused, you don't need to use single-user mode. Just
> run fdisk on the cli or gparted or Gnome disks in the gui. Delete
> all the unused partitions and create a new one with the free space.
Even though you
On 5/22/22 15:02, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Courtsey of Anaconda, I have 4 contiguous unused partitions. I would
like to merge them into a single partition.
AFAIK this is the procedure I should follow.
backup
Boot to single-user
use parted
rm partitions 2 3 4
resizepart partition 1
Oh yes and don't forget to run partprobe after changing the partition
size. Cheers.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedora
On 5/22/2022 6:02 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Courtsey of Anaconda, I have 4 contiguous unused partitions. I would
like to merge them into a single partition.
AFAIK this is the procedure I should follow.
backup
Boot to single-user
use parted
rm partitions 2 3 4
resizepart
On Sun, 2022-05-22 at 15:02 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Courtsey of Anaconda, I have 4 contiguous unused partitions. I would
> like to merge them into a single partition.
>
> AFAIK this is the procedure I should follow.
>
> backup
> Boot to single-user
> use parted
&
On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:02:06 -0700
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Do I have it right?
Probably, but:
I usually boot a live image and run gparted so I can use the less confusing
GUI interface to get all the details right (may have to install gparted
in the live image first).
I'm not sure even single us
Courtsey of Anaconda, I have 4 contiguous unused partitions. I would
like to merge them into a single partition.
AFAIK this is the procedure I should follow.
backup
Boot to single-user
use parted
rm partitions 2 3 4
resizepart partition 1
reboot
Do I have it right
On 12/6/20 11:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Slightly off topic and also hypothetical. Assume the same physical
> setup, but what if both were Btrfs?
Thanks Chris for that. Always enjoy the BTRFS inslights you provide.
--
Jorge
___
users mailing list --
/mnt/two.
Btrfs has the same limitation for resize as ext4 and XFS in that the
resize only happens at the end. But there is a work around, (which
also has an LVM equivalent.)
umount /mnt/one
btrfs device add /dev/sda1 /mnt/two
That's it. It's now a two device btrfs, made from two parti
ove the starting point of partition
> #2 to the beginning and then use resize2fs afterwards? I didn't know
> resize2fs would do that whole movement. Can it do it online
> (filesystem mounted?
Yes, I used gparted and it can do that. Like Samuel Sieb said, there's
other factor
On 12/6/20 6:03 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> gparted has to copy the entire 881GB of partition data from where it
> is to the new position. Then it will call resizefs to adjust the
> filesystem end.
ok, thanks. I didn't know Gparted was brave enough to have that feature...
--
Jorge
___
On 12/6/20 1:56 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 12/6/20 4:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You *can* do this, but you have to understand what is happening. First
the entire partition is moved (copied) to the new position. So all
881GB of data has to be read and written. And if the process gets
interrup
On 12/6/20 4:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You *can* do this, but you have to understand what is happening. First
> the entire partition is moved (copied) to the new position. So all
> 881GB of data has to be read and written. And if the process gets
> interrupted for any reason, your filesyste
Backups needed! Plural. Anytime someone openly admits they're screwed
if they lose certain files, it tells me at least two backup copies are
needed. In my case, the "I'm screwed" data is in a minimum of 4
independent backups including one offsite. Only one of those is raid1
and even though there ar
o all
881GB of data has to be read and written. And if the process gets
interrupted for any reason, your filesystem is toast. After the move is
done, then the filesystem can be expanded.
Your best option is to make a backup of all the data on both partitions,
delete the partitions, make th
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:18:15 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 12/6/20 1:07 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
>> Or, maybe gparted? I can delete sda1, then expand sda2 to the beginning
>> of the disk. Would that work?
>
> Hi,
>
> No, you can't. You can only expand forward; not backward (to the
> b
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:38:56PM -, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
> I guess that would work too, except I have far more and more important
> data on sda2, so if that gets messed up, I'm screwed.
O, this statement makes me concerned. That drive could fail at any
minute. The absolute best t
Hmmm, that's a bummer!
I guess that would work too, except I have far more and more important
data on sda2, so if that gets messed up, I'm screwed.
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:18:15 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 12/6/20 1:07 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
>> Or, maybe gparted? I can delete s
On 12/6/20 1:07 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
> Or, maybe gparted? I can delete sda1, then expand sda2 to the beginning
> of the disk. Would that work?
Hi,
No, you can't. You can only expand forward; not backward (to the
beginning as you say). For example, you could delete sda2 and expand
sda
the disk, without losing the
data on sda1 (and obviously on sda2 as well). Can that be done safely?
For instance, I'm thinking I can delete both partitions in fdisk and
create a single one for the entire disk. Then, don't format the new
partition. Would that pick up the existing files
use custom installation. Automatic installation was
preselected and could not change this. I used the same installation
way I had used to install F29,F30,F31. Somethimg is wrong. If this
behaviour is not wanted, it may be a bug, Did anyone else try to
install F32 on a disk with more partitions?
Ki
reselected and could not
change this. I used the same installation way I had used to install
F29,F30,F31. Somethimg is wrong. If this behaviour is not wanted, it may be a
bug, Did anyone else try to install F32 on a disk with more partitions?Kind
regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:25:48 + (UTC)
Joerg Lechner via users wrote:
> Hi,I tried to install F32 on one partition of an external disk with 3
> partitions. I could not choose the partition I wanted, there was no
> choice, which I have had in F31 and previously. Is the only way to
&g
Hi,I tried to install F32 on one partition of an external disk with 3
partitions. I could not choose the partition I wanted, there was no choice,
which I have had in F31 and previously. Is the only way to overwrite F31 in a 3
partitions disk an uograde F31 -> F32?Kind Regards Jo
Le 20/05/2020 à 11:13, François Patte a écrit :
>
>
>
> Message transféré
> Sujet : Re: automatic mount of partitions
> Date : Wed, 20 May 2020 11:08:08 +0200
> De : François Patte
> Organisation : Université Paris Descartes
> Pour : Greg Woods
Message transféré
Sujet : Re: automatic mount of partitions
Date : Wed, 20 May 2020 11:08:08 +0200
De : François Patte
Organisation : Université Paris Descartes
Pour : Greg Woods
Le 19/05/2020 à 18:59, Greg Woods a écrit :
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:41 AM
adding ,nofail in fstab will allow the mount to "fail" and continue
the boot, I use it on anything in fstab outside of critical boot up
partitions just so that the machine will not go to single user mode
and will come up on the network such that it can be fixed remotely.
On Tue, May 1
Hi.
On Tue, 19 May 2020 18:40:43 +0200 François Patte wrote:
> I have computer A (a desktop) and a computer B (a laptop) and I want to
> automatically mount a partition of A on B when B starts.
> I know that this can be done via autofs,
Not quite: only when you attempt to access the automount
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:41 AM François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
>
>
> I have computer A (a desktop) and a computer B (a laptop) and I want to
> automatically mount a partition of A on B when B starts.
>
I use systemd automounts for this. In /etc/fstab on B, something
Bonjour,
I want to automatically mount a partition from a computer on another
computer of my private network.
I have computer A (a desktop) and a computer B (a laptop) and I want to
automatically mount a partition of A on B when B starts.
I know that this can be done via autofs, but I read somew
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 00:36:04 +0200
Kad Zayar via users wrote:
> Does that mean that the install media should appear in my uefi boot
> menu as (at least) two entries? Or are we talking about the grub menu
> that appears *after* booting from the flash drive?
Yes to the first question, an EFI entry
On 11/8/19 2:36 PM, Kad Zayar via users wrote:
On 07/11/2019 23:59, stan via users wrote:
press the key that opens the machine
firmware (used to be called BIOS, but it isn't really any more),
usually F2 or Del. Then look at the boot menu provided, and select the
UEFI version of the install medi
On 07/11/2019 23:59, stan via users wrote:
press the key that opens the machine
firmware (used to be called BIOS, but it isn't really any more),
usually F2 or Del. Then look at the boot menu provided, and select the
UEFI version of the install media to boot. That will boot it in EFI
mode, and i
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 14:59 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:41:51 +0200
> Kad Zayar via users wrote:
>
> > altering Windows partitions is not something he's comfortable with,
> > while reinstalling Fedora is not a problem (he still hasn't made
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:41:51 +0200
Kad Zayar via users wrote:
> altering Windows partitions is not something he's comfortable with,
> while reinstalling Fedora is not a problem (he still hasn't made it
> his own).
You will have to re-install Fedora to get a UEFI install. I d
you guys know a less hacky
way (with grub itself maybe).
altering Windows partitions is not something he's comfortable with,
while reinstalling Fedora is not a problem (he still hasn't made it his
own).
Thanks!
___
users mailing list -- us
Formatting a partition is a bit extreme, but, yes, that is one
possibility
On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 15:23 -0800, Jack Craig wrote:
are you thinking of mkfs ??
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le..
Obiviously, this needs to be used with care so that you don't
> delete something importatnt.
>
> I am sure that others will give you more options.
>
> On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 19:24 +0100, Andreas Aßmann wrote:
>
> Can anybody tell me how I can clean my Fedora partitions, especi
2019-02-24 at 19:24 +0100, Andreas Aßmann wrote:
> Can anybody tell me how I can clean my Fedora partitions, especially
> system partition?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.f
uks-${UUID} UUID=${UUID} none
where ${UUID} is what I found in /dev/disk/by-uuid that points to a
physical partition /dev/sdX1
The good surprise is that if all the encrypted partitions have the
same passphrase, it is asked only once! but if you make an error the
first time then, you have to type it
On 09/04/2018 11:05 PM, Frédéric wrote:
I have multiple partitions encrypted with luks and only the main one
with /home is decrypted at startup. How can I tell the system I want
to open all of them at startup?
The system will prompt you for the block devices listed in
/etc/crypttab. See &quo
How about specifying the luks-pwd for all other partitions/VolumeGroups by
means of a LUKS_passwordfile?
hw
-Original Message-
From: François Patte [mailto:francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr]
Sent: woensdag 5 september 2018 9:42
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re
Le 05/09/2018 à 08:05, Frédéric a écrit :
> Hi,
> I have multiple partitions encrypted with luks and only the main one
> with /home is decrypted at startup. How can I tell the system I want
> to open all of them at startup?
You can maybe put a line in fstab for the partitions you want
Hi,
I have multiple partitions encrypted with luks and only the main one
with /home is decrypted at startup. How can I tell the system I want
to open all of them at startup?
Thanks,
F
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:26 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On 08/28/2017 05:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> > On 08/28/2017 03:27 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> >> One interesting thing I noticed with this: if I hit "Backspace" a few
>> >> times before
>>
it requires two subsequent attempts after that
> to decrypt,
> >> instead of the expected one.
> >>
> >>
> > This may or may not be your issue. So, just something to consider.
> >
> > A few years ago I had the same problem not with encrypted pa
Ed Greshko:
> Just a "funny" note here. I had to replace my keyboard due to "cat
> abuse". Unlike my old keyboard which had a dedicated power switch
> this one will go to sleep after a time. So, now I have to remember
> to hit any key if it has been idle for a time. The first key stroke
> only
t; instead of the expected one.
>>
>>
> This may or may not be your issue. So, just something to consider.
>
> A few years ago I had the same problem not with encrypted partitions but with
> the
> login at the GUI prompt (I was using KDM back then) after boot. I had to
ing to consider.
A few years ago I had the same problem not with encrypted partitions but with
the
login at the GUI prompt (I was using KDM back then) after boot. I had to
remember
to hit backspace a few times otherwise it would tell me the password was wrong.
I
have a wireless USB keyboard a
lla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470740
> Essentially, I have to enter my password 3 times on boot before my
> encrypted partitions unlock and I can boot, using graphical entry.
> If I hit Esc and enter at the text console, it seems to work on the first
> attempt (most of the time).
>
Hi all,
I'm seeing a similar error to what is described in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470740
Essentially, I have to enter my password 3 times on boot before my
encrypted partitions unlock and I can boot, using graphical entry.
If I hit Esc and enter at the text console, it
On 20/08/16 05:03, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
On a laptop, I would like to setup 2 encrypted partitions with the same
passphrase (this is easy). Now, when I boot the laptop, I would like to have
to provide the passphrase only one time.
Is it possible?
Thank.
Look at Pam_mount.
I use
Allegedly, on or about 20 August 2016, Patrick Dupre sent:
> On a laptop, I would like to setup 2 encrypted partitions with the
> same passphrase (this is easy). Now, when I boot the laptop, I would
> like to have to provide the passphrase only one time. Is it possible?
It did that
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 13:03:55 +0200,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
On a laptop, I would like to setup 2 encrypted partitions with the same
passphrase (this is easy). Now, when I boot the laptop, I would like to have
to provide the passphrase only one time.
Is it possible?
That is how it works now
Hello,
On a laptop, I would like to setup 2 encrypted partitions with the same
passphrase (this is easy). Now, when I boot the laptop, I would like to have
to provide the passphrase only one time.
Is it possible?
Thank
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> For Chris Murphy after you chastising.
> sudo vgs
> VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree
> vg_voyager 1 3 0 wz--n- 199.81g 114.00g
There is enough spare space in the VG to grow any of the LVs. So the
problem here is simply t
1 - 100 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
