On 11/12/2013 10:13 PM, Tim issued this missive:
Bob Goodwin:
I changed the router configuration to use 208.67.229.220:5353 and
208.67.222.222:5353 and see the following:
[root@box10 bobg]# dig www.bbc.co.uk
; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-rl.13207.22-P2-RedHat-9.9.3-5.P2.fc19 <<>> www.bbc.co.uk
;; global o
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:03 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Maybe, maybe not. If one of their DNS servers was flakey, your
> complaint would not be alone. If they replaced/repaired their server,
> everyone will see the fix.
>
> And the front line phone staff may be unaware of the issue.
It depen
Bob Goodwin:
> I changed the router configuration to use 208.67.229.220:5353 and
> 208.67.222.222:5353 and see the following:
>
> [root@box10 bobg]# dig www.bbc.co.uk
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-rl.13207.22-P2-RedHat-9.9.3-5.P2.fc19 <<>> www.bbc.co.uk
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;;
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 23:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> If the ISP is doing transparent DNS proxy I seriously doubt that any
> of that matters.
It depends on how they're doing it. If they simply intercept port 53
traffic, then not using port 53 for your queries will bypass it. But if
they also sn
On 12/11/13 18:58, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 10Nov2013 20:18, Bob Goodwin wrote:
[...] Further more their system
does other things that I don't want to lose, namely the "free time"
during the wee hours when I can allow the Apple computers to connect
with iCloud, [...]
Regarding reigning in t
On 11Nov2013 20:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
[...]
> Source:
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/01/how-viasats-exede-makes-satellite-broadband-not-suck/
>
> He makes it sound that it's essential to stick with their software,
> some parts of which are apparently contained in the modem. As I said
>
On 11/12/2013 04:03 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
And the front line phone staff may be unaware of the issue.
Speaking as somebody who did phone tech support for an ISP, that's quite
possible. Granted, we did have a page that (supposedly) listed all
known outages, but it was almost never up to
On 12Nov2013 13:19, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [...] I have had some intermittent problems recently but since
> my complaint yesterday it has worked well. Coincidence perhaps?
Maybe, maybe not. If one of their DNS servers was flakey, your
complaint would not be alone. If they replaced/repaired their se
On 10Nov2013 20:18, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [...] Further more their system
> does other things that I don't want to lose, namely the "free time"
> during the wee hours when I can allow the Apple computers to connect
> with iCloud, [...]
Regarding reigning in the Apple stuff, what approach are you u
On 12/11/13 13:28, Jim wrote:
On 11/12/2013 01:19 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you t
On 11/12/2013 10:03 AM, Jim wrote:
You can goto http://getip.com and it will tell you what your IP is. Hech
it will even show you and everybody where you live.
Actually, no. It won't. What it shows is where the DSLAM you're
connected to is, and in my case, that's several miles away.
--
use
On 11/12/2013 01:19 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you to
their DNS no matter what you s
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you to their
DNS no matter what you set your router for and there is nothing wrong
with the way that w
On 11/12/2013 12:00 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 09:41, Tim wrote:
I get about a quarter or third of that time if I try other DNS servers.
My own took 1500 mS the first time, then 6 ms for subsequent attempts
(local cache is much quicker than internet propagation de
On 12/11/13 09:41, Tim wrote:
I get about a quarter or third of that time if I try other DNS servers.
My own took 1500 mS the first time, then 6 ms for subsequent attempts
(local cache is much quicker than internet propagation delays). Queries
for other addresses took about 100 mS, so the BBC
On 11/12/13 22:41, Tim wrote:
> Next time it happens, start playing with the dig tool. Make queries
> against your router, and against the DNS IPs the ISP provides (to the
> router), and try some external DNS servers that have different ports
> (the dig command lets you specify ports, read the man
Allegedly, on or about 11 November 2013, Bob Goodwin sent:
> He makes it sound that it's essential to stick with their software,
> some parts of which are apparently contained in the modem. As I said I
> am quite happy with the service, it normally works well and there is
> nothing better availabl
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> On 10/11/13 19:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
>>> No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it
>>> for it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.
On 11/11/13 19:12, Tim wrote:
That'd be HTTP caching. They don't need to subvert DNS records for you
to see cached websites. Unless they're doing something stupid, your web
requests are still made of the original IPs, just the results are
cached.
I have the same thing, here, on my LAN. A Sq
Tim:
>> Unless you're doing something odd, the amount of traffic from DNS
>> data is minuscule compared to everything else.
Bob Goodwin:
> But what if they are caching stuff, e.g. foxnews, some popular video
> clips, etc. and delivering them to the user without going through the
> satellite loo
On 11/11/13 08:40, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Don't exclude the possibility that the modem itself is flipping out.
My DSL started going down once a week or so, some years ago.
Powercycling the modem always put me back online. Troubleshooting with
the ISP wasn't very productive. I ended up buyin
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
But what if they are caching stuff, e.g. foxnews, some popular video clips,
etc. and delivering them to the user without going through the satellite
loop? I don't know what they are doing but they claim to be "optimizing" the
system with their cac
On 11/11/13 07:18, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
when I began using this service I was advised not to try to work
around their system since it would result in my being charged for
higher usage and my allotment is limited.
Unless yo
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
> when I began using this service I was advised not to try to work
> around their system since it would result in my being charged for
> higher usage and my allotment is limited.
Unless you're doing something odd, t
well, I don't want to change it, I just need
to convince them there is a DNS problem and I think it is in their
system. This thread has provided some help in how to do that.
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 Fedora-19/64 bit Linux/XFCE
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On 10/11/13 19:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I need to convince them they have a problem, will check more next
time it goes out.
Get someone on the horn who has a minimum of an understanding, and
tell them you can't ping their DNS servers.
Yes, I intend to do that, thought I had enough info
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
> some optimization system Viasat uses.
There is a chance that you coul
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
On 10/11/13 19:12, Steven Stern wrote:
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS servers.
Yes, those worked well when I was able to use them, this
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
On 10/11/13 19:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for
it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change
DD-WRT does
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
> Am I missing some point here? Is there some connection between dhcp
> and dns that I am not aware of. My dhcp server is in the router and
> deals with about thirty addresses on the LAN and works faultlessly as
> far
On 10/11/13 19:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure
it for it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This
was a change
DD-WRT does not give you the option to use fixed DNS ser
On 10/11/13 18:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
Quite some time ago it was determined that your ISP uses "transparent DNS
proxy" to force you to use their DNS servers.
But, I really would ask them about their use of IP addresses as this is
the output of whois 182.63.128.68
inetnum:182.62.
On 10/11/13 19:12, Steven Stern wrote:
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS servers.
Yes, those worked well when I was able to use them, this system goes to
it's own DNS no matter what
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for
it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change
DD-WRT does not give you the option to use fixed DNS servers, instead of
whatever DHCP servers it g
On 11/10/2013 02:29 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> DD-WRT configuration is set for the following:
>
> 182.63.128.68 and 182.63.128.69
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS ser
On 11/11/13 06:32, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for it
> always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change when
> they began to offer this high speed service, before that I always used some
On 10/11/13 16:38, staticsafe wrote:
DD-WRT configuration is set for the following:
>
>182.63.128.68 and 182.63.128.69
>
>Normally it works well and does its job instantly as far as I can tell.
>
dresden ~ # dig google.com @182.63.128.68
; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-P2 <<>> google.com @182.63.128.68
;; g
On 11/11/13 05:38, staticsafe wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 15:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
>> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
>> some optimization system Viasat uses.
>>
>> DD-WR
On 11/10/2013 15:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
> some optimization system Viasat uses.
>
> DD-WRT configuration is set for the following
On 10/11/13 15:19, staticsafe wrote:
On 11/10/2013 15:17, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Well this is what I see:
[bobg@box10 ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.1.1
192.168.1.1 is my Linksys E3000 DD-WRT router.
DD-WRT usually runs a forwar
On 11/10/2013 15:17, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Well this is what I see:
>
> [bobg@box10 ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> nameserver 192.168.1.1
>
>
> 192.168.1.1 is my Linksys E3000 DD-WRT router.
>
DD-WRT usually runs a forwarder, check your router t
I tried taking the router out of the circuit and connecting
directly to the modem, that effected no change. Curiously, at the time
this this morning when the problem was manifest tech support's "computer
was down" which left me wondering if there was a correlation with my
apparent
ected. At the request of viasat tech
> support I tried taking the router out of the circuit and connecting
> directly to the modem, that effected no change. Curiously, at the time
> this this morning when the problem was manifest tech support's "computer
> was down" which lef
effected no change. Curiously, at the time
this this morning when the problem was manifest tech support's "computer
was down" which left me wondering if there was a correlation with my
apparent DNS problem. I was asked to call back in a few hours, I did that.
The tech support p
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 07:06 -0400, Tod Thomas wrote:
> I have a FC14 VM running on a Win7 box using Virtual Box. I cannot get
> Network Manager to keep the domain name so I'm constantly having to add
> it at the end of my host names which is a little annoying. I've googled
> around and there a
On 06/23/2011 07:56 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:06:55 -0400
> Tod Thomas wrote:
>
>> I cannot get
>> Network Manager to keep the domain name so I'm constantly having to add
>> it at the end of my host names which is a little annoying.
> In theory you can make NM stop fooling wit
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:06:55 -0400
Tod Thomas wrote:
> I cannot get
> Network Manager to keep the domain name so I'm constantly having to add
> it at the end of my host names which is a little annoying.
In theory you can make NM stop fooling with the resolv.conf
file by putting PEERDNS="no" in
Am 23.06.2011 13:06, schrieb Tod Thomas:
> I have a FC14 VM running on a Win7 box using Virtual Box. I cannot get
> Network Manager to keep the domain name so I'm constantly having to add
> it at the end of my host names which is a little annoying. I've googled
> around and there are a numbe
I have a FC14 VM running on a Win7 box using Virtual Box. I cannot get
Network Manager to keep the domain name so I'm constantly having to add
it at the end of my host names which is a little annoying. I've googled
around and there are a number of suggestions but none of them are
definitive.
ma, 2010-11-01 kello 01:54 +1030, Tim kirjoitti:
> Well, the error message said "temporary" failure, with a "deferred"
> status of the queue. Once the problem goes away, it can retry. Or may
> just keep retrying, anyway.
>
> The obvious question occurs: Had you restarted the mailserver during
>
On Saturday, October 30, 2010 22:30:40 Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> On 10/30/2010 06:16 PM, Hiisi Troll wrote:
> > In the provided sendmail.mc file there's an option:
> > define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.direct.ru')dnl I thought it relays all
> > my outgoing mail to ISP smtp server. Or am I wrong here?
>
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:42 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> Despite it didn't helped immediately, the problem is gone now. I don't
> know what caused it because neither me nor ISP people did nothing to
> it at that moment. Strangely, mail queue released and all letters hit
> the rcpt to address.
Well, the e
su, 2010-10-31 kello 17:47 +1030, Tim kirjoitti:
<--SNIP-->
>
> If you cannot set your own reverse DNS, you'll have to ask your ISP (or
> mail host) to set it for you. If they cannot, you're stuck.
>
<--SNIP-->
>
>
Thank you for clarification, Tim! Your responses are always explain the
basics
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 02:16 +0400, Hiisi Troll wrote:
> In the provided sendmail.mc file there's an option:
> define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.direct.ru')dnl
> I thought it relays all my outgoing mail to ISP smtp server. Or am I
> wrong here?
The smart host would be the name of the ISP's mail server. I
On 10/30/2010 06:16 PM, Hiisi Troll wrote:
> In the provided sendmail.mc file there's an option:
> define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp.direct.ru')dnl
> I thought it relays all my outgoing mail to ISP smtp server. Or am I
> wrong here?
Try putting the smtp machine name between square brackets:
define(`SMAR
la, 2010-10-30 kello 15:56 -0600, Frank Cox kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 01:44 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> > However it's impossible to send messages from this machine to the
> > outside world.
>
> because
>
> > My ISP rejects all outgoing connections to port 25 except to their own
> > smtp-server
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 01:44 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> However it's impossible to send messages from this machine to the
> outside world.
because
> My ISP rejects all outgoing connections to port 25 except to their own
> smtp-server (smtp.direct.ru).
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www
Hi, list!
I'm trying to configure my system as a mail server. It's f12. My ISP
provides me with a static IP address and I've binded domain name to it
(kello.ru) I have sendmail installed and can successfully send messages
from remote hosts to users on this machine (i.e. to r...@kello.ru).
However i
On 09/08/2010 07:14 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:23 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> The other thing that may help is runnng your own nameserver.
> I've done that for years, and would recommend it to anyone capable of
> doing so. All the ISPs I've used have had awful DNS server
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:23 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> The other thing that may help is runnng your own nameserver.
I've done that for years, and would recommend it to anyone capable of
doing so. All the ISPs I've used have had awful DNS servers, either
sporadically, or permanently. A
Gordon Charrick writes:
> The problem is that when I go to the site or refresh it, I see the
> message "Looking up www.kitco.com" in Firefox's status bar for several
> seconds before the page comes up. I don't have this problem with any
> other web pages and also don't have this problem when I
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 09:59 -0700, Gordon Charrick wrote:
> The problem is that when I go to the site or refresh it, I see the
> message "Looking up www.kitco.com" in Firefox's status bar for several
> seconds before the page comes up. I don't have this problem with any
> other web pages and also
Gordon Charrick wrote:
> I often use the site www.kitco.com in Firefox. This is a company, in
> the US, that deals in precious metals (gold, silver, etc.).
>
> The problem is that when I go to the site or refresh it, I see the
> message "Looking up www.kitco.com" in Firefox's status bar for se
I often use the site www.kitco.com in Firefox. This is a company, in
the US, that deals in precious metals (gold, silver, etc.).
The problem is that when I go to the site or refresh it, I see the
message "Looking up www.kitco.com" in Firefox's status bar for several
seconds before the page co
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, JB wrote:
> L gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
> Hi,
> would that help ?
>
> man dhclient.conf
> prepend ...
> append ...
> request ...
> etc.
>
> # ls /etc/dhcp*
>
> JB
>
Thanks alot. that stuff was hidden in file
/etc/dhclient-eth1.conf
as
prepend domain-name-se
L gmail.com> writes:
> ...
Hi,
would that help ?
man dhclient.conf
prepend ...
append ...
request ...
etc.
# ls /etc/dhcp*
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelin
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:42 PM, L wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:22 PM, JB wrote:
>> L gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> ...
>>> I check around and can't find where the old DNS nameservers were hidden
>>> ...
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [...@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
>> # Generated by NetworkManager
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:22 PM, JB wrote:
> L gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I check around and can't find where the old DNS nameservers were hidden
>> ...
>
> Hi,
>
> [...@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> domain example.com
> search example.com
> nameserver
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:46 +1000, L wrote:
> In the Search Domains text box, type "opennic.glue". I'm not sure if
> this is needed, but it never hurt anything in the past.
The search domain is what will be appended to hostnames, when you do
things using just the hostname.
e.g. "ping testname" wo
L gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> I check around and can't find where the old DNS nameservers were hidden
> ...
Hi,
[...@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
domain example.com
search example.com
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 1.2.3.4
nameserver 5.6.7.8
# NOTE: the libc
Hi
I use NetworkManager to manage wireless connection following these steps:
1. Right click the network manager icon in the panel and click Edit
Connections.
2. Select wireless tab, choose the access ID under Name column, click edit.
3. Click the IPv4 Settings tab.
4. Choose Automatic with manual
71 matches
Mail list logo
