Re: How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

Ron Flory via users wrote: > On 4/22/2025 3:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 4/22/25 2:26 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: >>> I don't launch my Linux systems into GUI-mode by default If you don't want to use the graphical boot in general, removing `rhgb quiet` (or just `rhgb`) from the kernel comman

Re: qemu-kvm running machine at host shutdown/reboot?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 3/28/25 4:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 3/28/25 2:41 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> What happens to a running qemu-kvm virtual machine >>> when the host shuts down or reboots? >>> >>> Does the hypervisor issue a shutdown to the VM? >>> Or freeze and save

Re: SOLVED - Re: follow-up: searching a directory sub-tree.

home user via users wrote: > On 3/26/25 8:02 PM, home user via users wrote: >> On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> home user via users writes: > >> By the way, grep's behavior suggests that the order of >> the options matters.  I did not expect that.  Does the >> order of the options rea

Re: Errors in DMESG After System Update

Stephen Morris wrote: >     Just a query first off, why do I need to run dmesg under sudo for it to > produce its output? In Fedora 39 (or there about), the CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT kernel config was changed. The commit in the Fedora kernel source tree provides some useful details¹: Tu

Re: Turning off current directory display in a terminal window

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 15:48 +0100, Marco wrote: >> On 12.03.2025 10:42 Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>> How might I turn off (or change) the display of the current path in a >>> terminal window? >> >> That is being controlled by $PS1 in bashrc (or the config of another

Re: Turning off current directory display in a terminal window

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > How might I turn off (or change) the display of the current path in a > terminal window? > > For example I have one terminal window with: > > rgm@LX140e-3:~/data/htt/Projects/Critical/drafts/draft-ietf-drip-rid/dki-try2$ > > That is the whole line is taken up with the c

Re: dnf behavior

Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Folks, >  a long time ago I installed a number of i686 packages on my system.  I now > want to remove them.  When I try to remove one particular package I get some > unexpected behavior. > > I do > > dnf remove pixman.i686 > > and I get: > > Package A

Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 7:41 AM Richard Shaw > wrote: >> I agree that Gparted would be good to have but I just use >> System Rescue CD in these situations. > > The Live ISO's come with fdisk, but not gdisk. If a tool > is going to be supplied on x86_64, it should be gdisk >

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

Robert Nichols via users wrote: > I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean > update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it > installed many updates including a new kernel. After a reboot, much to my > surprise dnfdragora reported 18

Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Thanks for the clarifications and explanations! What would > you suggest for mounting a Proton drive. I basically want > to copy my files out of it. Unfortunately, I don't have any direct experience with Proton Drive. Hopefully someone else will be able to help.

Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > On Sun Jan12'25 01:08:52PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2336979#c1: >> >>> Backend is disabled for now >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rclone/blob/rawhide/f/rclone.spec#_6 >> > >

Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > According to the manpage for Rclone, it seems to me that I > an option with a number for mounting Proton drive using > rclone on F41 (when we get to Storage). However, I tried > both v1.67.0 and v1.68.2 (that is on updates-testing) but > I can not find this option.

Re: experimental jit support in python 3.13?

Neal Becker wrote: > Thanks, but just to verify I asked chatgpt how to tell if it was enabled at > compile time and it suggested: > import sysconfig > print(sysconfig.get_config_var("WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_FOO")) > which prints "None". I guess if I needed any more confirmation that things like ChatGPT

Re: experimental jit support in python 3.13?

Neal Becker wrote: > I believe experimental jit support in python 3.13 needs to > be enabled both at compile time and at runtime. Does > Fedora's python3.13 have this enabled? Knowing nothing about this, I searched the fine web and checked the Python 3.13 release notes which explain this and how

Re: Colorized vtty text...

Felix Miata wrote: > dnf repolist enabled no longer works, and neither dnf5 > repolist enabled. As dnf5 is a major rewrite, many of the options are different than they were in previous dnf releases. Running `dnf -h` and `dnf repolist -h` are worth while. The latter reports: Usage: dnf

Re: OT: Question on winehq-devel and wine-devel

Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > On machines with Fedora 40 it updated fine. > wine-devel-10.0.rc2-1.1.x86_64 > winehq-devel-10.0.rc2-1.1.x86_64 > > But on Fedora 41 machines it finds the winehq-devel rc2, but > reports that nothing provides the wine-devel rc2? > > Only shows the wine-dev

Re: Non-sensical DNF Functionality

Stephen Morris wrote: > Yes, but this still highlights the final question as "sudo dnf download > symlinks-1.7-11.fc41.src" does the download but as shown above "sudo dnf > install symlinks-1.7-11.fc41.src" won't do the install. > > How do I find where the source has been installed to when under d

Re: Fedora 41 systemd or its dependencies now includes qemu

Dave Close wrote: > Patrick Mansfield wrote: > >> Why does the most recent systemd update pull in qemu? >> That seems excessive. >> >> Currently running Fedora 41 with systemd version 256.8-1, >> looks like the update moves me to systemd version >> 256.9-2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: Bash initialization

Will McDonald wrote: > On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 at 17:10, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > >> On Sun, 2024-12-01 at 11:16 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>> One thing which is new is the bash-color-prompt package was >>> added. This installs /etc/profile.d/b

Re: Bash initialization

Hi, GianPiero Puccioni wrote: > I just upgraded to F40 and my bash prompt has changed, I > have it set up in .bash_profile and it worked before. > > I thought that the default config /etc/profile and > /etc/bashrc were read first and than the user > .bash_profile and .bashrc so you can change the

Re: F41 DNF bogus error

Go Canes wrote: > I have not upgraded to F41 but from what I have seen on the list, it > seems to me that: > 1) dnf5 is implemented in python > 2) dnf5 is using "argparse" to parse command line options > 3) dnf5 is using "argparse subparsers" to implement the dnf5 commands It is true that dnf5 par

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

Andras Simon wrote: > Le mar. 19 nov. 2024, 16:16, Todd Zullinger a écrit : > >> [...] >> >> ¹ I'm sure many people swear by pip, but I think it's barely >> better than running `curl ... | bash` to install things, >> which I consider to be a bad

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:16 AM Todd Zullinger wrote: >> ¹ I'm sure many people swear by pip, but I think it's barely >> better than running `curl ... | bash` to install things, >> which I consider to be a bad practice. > > cURL

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 14:01 +, Will McDonald wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 14:00, Will McDonald wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 13:45, Patrick O'Callaghan >>> wrote: >>> I'm attempting to convert a small Python-2 script to Python-3. >>> >> By

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

Go Canes wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:45 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: >> >> I'm attempting to convert a small Python-2 script to Python-3. > > How small? It might be easy to do by-hand. I.e., if it is aborting > on things like "print 'something'", that just needs to be changed to > "pr

Re: Adding a repo using dnf / signal-desktop

Max Pyziur wrote: >> On 11/18/2024 4:01 AM EST Barry wrote: >>> On 18 Nov 2024, at 02:32, Max Pyziur wrote: >>> >>> With the recent upgrade from Fedora 40 to Fedora 41, I >>> lost signal-desktop. The repo as listed for the F40 >>> version is: >>> >>> Signal Messaging Devel Project (Fedora_40) >

Re: DNF Group Issue

Stephen Morris wrote: >     While we are on this groups topic, I used to be able to issue commands > dnf grouplist and dnf groupinstall as alternatives to dnf group list and dnf > group install, but the first two commands don't work anymore, was this a > deliberate alias removal and if so why? It

Re: Remove disk encryption in Maintenance Mode

Roger Heflin wrote: > I am not sure what version mine last worked on. I would guess the > default changed on 39 or 40. > > What fixed it for me (type plain password from stdin) was adding > --hash ripemd160 (they appear to have changed the default hash, BAD > developer). > > Guessing related to

Re: dnf5 skip-broken

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 04:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> On 10/23/24 02:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> Yet another reason to be discussing this on the Test list. >> >> They are not very responsive over there. > > They'll still want to hear about bugs. A

Re: dnf5 skip-broken

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 10/22/24 2:04 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> What replaces --skip-broken in dnf5? >> >> # dnf --releasever=40 --skip-broken upgrade >> Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for >> more information about the arguments. [...] > It

Re: terminal open errors

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 10/22/24 16:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Fedora 40 (perhaps) >> bash-completion-2.11-14.fc40.noarch >> >> When I open a (bash) terminal, I get the following errors >> >> bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found >> bash: _comp_deprecat

Re: terminal open errors

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Fedora 40 (perhaps) > bash-completion-2.11-14.fc40.noarch > > When I open a (bash) terminal, I get the following errors > [...] > bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found > bash: _comp_deprecate_var: command not found Searching the fine web tells you that thi

Re: Apache suspend/resume (again)

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: >> On suspend: >> Sep 09 01:01:44 Bree systemd[1]: Starting systemd-suspend.service - System >> Suspend... >> Sep 09 01:01:44 Bree systemd[1]: httpd.service: Sent signal SIGWINCH to main >> process 332400 (httpd) on client request.

Re: Apache suspend/resume (again)

francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 12:16:59 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> I enabled httpd.socket (and made no other changes), did a daemon- >> reload, then manually stopped Apache, but connecting to it doesn't >> restart it again. > > You need to start httpd.socket,

Re: Apache suspend/resume (again)

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > 1. I run httpd via systemd for a small personal web service. This > works. > > 2. I suspend my system overnight and wake it automatically in the > morning). This turns out to be irrelevant, because the problem reported > here occurs even when I do it manually. > > 3.

Re: I need grep . help

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 22:32 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: >> Double and single quotes seem equivalent here.  But note that inside >> single quotes the backslash is always literal, not special, while inside >> double quotes it depends on the character following the backslash

Re: I need grep . help

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > I am literally looking for "9.4.5" with grep. Grep thinks > I want the dots to be wild cards. What am I doing wrong? > > $ curl -L "https://sourceforge.net/projects/crystaldiskinfo/files/"; -o - | > grep -i '9.4.5' To take another tangent, the curl `

Re: Fedora 40 server - /etc/systemd/*.conf files missing etc

I wrote: > These files are marked %ghost to prevents them from being > removed *if they existed and were modified* prior to commit > 4c7acde (Do not remove modified config files, 2023-12-13)¹ > on the f40 branch of the systemd package. > > ¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/c/4c7acde An

Re: Fedora 40 server - /etc/systemd/*.conf files missing etc

Franta Hanzlík via users wrote: > And I also lived in the fact that it is not enough for the package file > to be marked as config - for the verification to pass if it is missing. > I thought they must have some "phantom" attribute or something similar. > I have to look into it more closely... Th

Re: key updating (was: Signal-Desktop & nodejs-electron GPG key problem)

Tim via users wrote: >> If you remove the key and run dnf again, it should prompt >> you to install the current key, which will (hopefully) work. >> >> In other words: >> >> $ sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-17280ddf > > I've encountered that kind of thing before, but why does it require > manual int

Re: Signal-Desktop & nodejs-electron GPG key problem

I wrote: > Max Pyziur wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> When updating via dnf update I get the following error messages: >> The GPG keys listed for the "Signal Messaging Devel Project (Fedora_40)" >> repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. >> Check that the correct

Re: Signal-Desktop & nodejs-electron GPG key problem

Max Pyziur wrote: > > Greetings, > > When updating via dnf update I get the following error messages: > The GPG keys listed for the "Signal Messaging Devel Project (Fedora_40)" > repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. > Check that the correct key URLs are conf

Re: Unable to build Fedora own package (samba): Empty %files file debugsourcefiles.list

Franta Hanzlík via users wrote: > When trying rebuild RPM package from Fedora repo, I ends with error: > > $ dnf download --source samba > > $ rpm -Uv samba-4.20.2-1.fc40.src.rpm > > $ rpmbuild -ba samba.spec > ... (some ~18 MB and ~24000 lines output) [...] > Processing files: samba-debugsource

Re: logrotate service failing

Paolo Galtieri wrote: > It's interesting that both packages are available on F39. > Is there a reason to have both?  And if only one should be > installed which? It's not really different than having multiple web browsers or desktop environments. Some folks like rsyslog, some like syslog-ng. You

Re: logrotate service failing

Go Canes wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 3:49 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: >> >> I wonder then if this is an issue due to dnf upgrade? I've used dnf >> upgrade to upgrade my system since at least F35. I wonder if at some >> point there was a syslog file which then became rsyslog and the old >> sysl

Re: another f38->f40 issue: network if is renamed.

fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: > How do I check that these keyfiles were created? This is a handy command for checking what file defines a connection: $ nmcli -f name,filename,device connection -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature --

Re: password issue with f40

Doug Herr wrote: > Just adding my saved note on how it can be done: > > Pull files out of an rpm without installing it: > mkdir foo ; cp file.rpm foo ; cd foo > rpm2cpio - < file.rpm | cpio --extract --no-absolute-filenames > --make-directories Or simpler, IMO: Install 'rpmdevtools' and use:

Re: How to remove settings from a systemd unit file

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 06:41 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Then, when you get to the actual description: >> >> ProtectHome= >> Takes a boolean argument or the special values >> "read-only" or "tmpfs". If true, the directories >> /home/, /root, and /run

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...snip loads of useful information...] > So, I think if you: > > disable systemd-resolved To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was enabled by default (F33) contains an example of how to ensure the service remains disabled -- which would avoid the situation

Re: Fedora 40 and Python 3.11 artifacts?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I'm trying to work around the Selenium packaging problem detailed at > . When following > c1, I noticed I have Python 3.11 and 3.12 paths: > > # ls /usr/lib/python3.1* > python3.11/ python3.12/ > > This machine h

Re: Question on $FileCreateMode for imjournal

Mark C. Allman via users wrote: > I'm seeing this line in /var/log/messages: > > imjournal: filecreatemode is not set, using default 0644 [v8.2312.0-1.fc40 > try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2186 ] > > From the page > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/configuration/action/rsconf1_filecreatemode.html, > I

Re: crippling nvidia display issue.

home user wrote: > I tried the command suggested in that log file. > > -- > bash.24[~]: /usr/sbin/akmods --force > Checking kmods exist for 6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64 [ OK ] > Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED] > Building rpms failed; see > /var/cache

Re: F40: mock fails with (some) explicit paths in BuildRequires:

Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I cannot mock-rebuild packages that have /some/ BuildRequires: with explicit > file dependencies, for F40. I have no idea why just /some/ of them are > rejected. > > I'm using mock to rebuild SRPMS in an F40 chroot, and it fails thusly: > > Updating and loading repositori

Re: Where is the source code for a Koji build?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> More generally, koji shows the build parameters used, which >> include: >> >> Src: >> git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wcm.git#2a4fa39f933f274689c07632e50c7db042247f08 >> >> The commit id can be confirmed as the tip of the f39 branch. >> That's helpful to know wh

Re: Where is the source code for a Koji build?

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I'm new to working with Fedora's Release Engineering. I ran across a > package that Failed To Build From Source (FTBS) for Fedora 40 at > . I have C and > C++ experience, and I believe I can help. > > I'm having trouble m

Re: wsdd failed Result: resources

services/wsdd-http.xml -%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/wsdd +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/default/wsdd %{_bindir}/wsdd %{_mandir}/man8/wsdd.8* %license LICENSE @@ -64,6 +67,9 @@ exit 0 %changelog +* Mon Feb 12 2024 Todd Zullinger - 0.7.1-3 +- fix systemd handling of environm

Re: How do I read result of a QR Code

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 1/16/24 15:44, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 1/16/24 15:42, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> You are misunderstanding how this works.  That QR code contains a >>> secret value that lets the OTP application generate the 6 digit >>> codes as needed.  There is no actual code in the

Re: gzip eps

I wrote: > Barry wrote: >>> On 15 Jan 2024, at 15:24, Patrick Dupre via users >>> wrote: >>> >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/usr/share/lyx/scripts/convertDefault.py", line 68, in >>>if sys.argv[3] == 'ppm' and (im and version >= 0x060305 or gm): >>>

Re: gzip eps

Barry wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2024, at 15:24, Patrick Dupre via users >> wrote: >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/share/lyx/scripts/convertDefault.py", line 68, in >>if sys.argv[3] == 'ppm' and (im and version >= 0x060305 or gm): >>^

Re: conflict with ffmpeg

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/24/23 17:40, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> --allowerasing would seem to be the only suggestion likely to result in >> a functional ffmpeg, >> but I do not kow what damage that would cause. >> Suggestions? >> >> I was hoping for a --dry-run or some such option, >> but no suc

Re: How to downgrade PHP

Clifford Snow wrote: > I just upgraded my F39 machine and received PHP 8.3.0-RC6-1 - nice except > my Nextcloud installation doesn't like it. Any suggestions on how to > downgrade PHP to 8.2 Fedora 39 has php-8.2.12-1.fc39. If you're getting 8.3.0~RC6, you would appear to be on Rawhide (what will

Re: Obscure rsyslog question on remote logging

Tom Horsley wrote: > I've got an old PC running Truenas as a local server for backups, > videos, etc. > > I've got another PC I consider my "main" system running rsyslog. > On this PC I have tried (mostly successfully) to direct remote > syslog messages from the Truenas system to logfiles in a sub

Re: sudoers security question

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/30/23 18:15, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> It seems to me that since /etc/sudoers is visible from a >> standard user account, that all a bad guy has to do is >> cat the file, find some program that is elevated, then >> overwrite that program with his evi

Re: Source code (SRPM?) for COPR package?

Ian Pilcher wrote: > Is the source code for COPR packages available anywhere? Each copr contains the srpms. If you have one installed and enabled you can pull up the baseurl and browse to the srpm. One way to do it: $ sudo dnf repolist -v copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:tmz:git | grep baseu

Re: rpm output

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: >> rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) >> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 >> Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: >> Parsing an OpenPGP packet: >>Failed to parse Signature Packet

Re: Listing a libvirt domain

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2023-10-24 at 12:37 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> As I tried to indicate in my original post, that shows nothing: >>> >>> $ virsh list --all >>>  Id   Name   State >>

Re: Listing a libvirt domain

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > As I tried to indicate in my original post, that shows nothing: > > $ virsh list --all > Id Name State > You may be running VM's in the user session rather than system session. Try specifying the user session to connect to with the -c option

Re: Thunderbird 115 FC 38

Dave Close wrote: > Tim wrote: >> Adam Mercer wrote: >>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up >>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39 >>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue... >> >>Well, I might disagree. Your m

Re: Problem with mediawriter on old Fedora installation

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 9/14/23 17:21, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 09/14/2023 03:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote: >>> dd if=f38.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1m (see note below about bs=) >> >> I've always used mediawriter ever since it was available, and whatever >> came before that as well.  This is the first time I've

Re: Problem with mediawriter on old Fedora installation

Mike Wright wrote: > On 9/14/23 14:30, Joe Zeff wrote: >> I know that there's a way to put the .iso onto the drive >> with dd, but don't know the proper incantation as I've >> never had to do it before.  If somebody can provide it, >> I'd be grateful. > > dd works well for creating bootable device

Re: Upgraded machine to Fedora 38 and now suspending after 15 minues??

Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > On 19 Aug 2023 at 23:09, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> And if for some reason that's not an option (though I think >> it is the best answer for a headless machine), there are >> other ways to resolve the effects of this change mention

Re: Upgraded machine to Fedora 38 and now suspending after 15 minues??

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 8/19/23 18:25, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: >> Have 4 machines that are headless machines. >> Boot up, and have VNC run to allow access using XFCE sessions. >> >> After upgrading the one to Fedora 38, have the machine going off >> after 15 minutes since no user is

Re: recommended key pair encryption

François Patte wrote: > What could be helpfull would be to tell people how to create a SHA2 > signature key > > I have a ssh connexion problem after upgrading a remote machine to f38 and > it is hard to find out what to do to solve the problem. > > I succeeded (at last!): > > ssh-keygen -t r

Re: recommended key pair encryption

Mike Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > I recall a discussion that may have said RSA was not being accepted in f38 > and a different type was being preferred, possibly ecdsa? It's only old RSA1 keys which use SHA1 which are not accepted by default. RSA keys which use a SHA2 algorithm are perfectly acce

Re: libvirtd.service won't start

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2023-07-09 18:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> The file should have not been used to create the >> links.  The links should have been created based >> on the reviion of libvirtd > > Why not? That's exactly what ldconfig does. It creates links to the latest > version o

Re: How do I remove expired signatures?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Fedora 38 > > $ rpm -qa > ... > :error: Verifying a signature using certificate > 09E55FAF4F7862CD6D558997CDFB5FA52007B954 (Metasploit > ): > 1. Certificiate CDFB5FA52007B954 invalid: certificate is not alive > because: The primary key is not live > be

Re: rpm qa signatures

Hi, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I just upgraded to Fedora 38. > > When I went to ask "rpm" what my version of > Xfce was, I got a ton of this scrolling > over my terminal: > > $ rpm -qa xfce4\* > ... > error: Verifying a signature using certificate > 555FD53A996BB0E1029F7AF2AFF47E8B2A31FBDF

Re: Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo?

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Where is the Fedora Testing Release repo for Fedora 37? > (I am after the URL not now to run DNF.) > > Unfortunately, I have only gotten to > > https://ap.edge.kernel.org/fedora/releases/37/ > > And could not find it. The testing repos are under upda

Re: Disable btrfs memory swap file

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened >> with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I >> resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to >> mod

Re: Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > 'dnf update' is failing for me for F38 on x86_64. Is anyone else > experiencing failures during DNF update? > > I want to ensure something did not recently break with systemd (that I > have to fix). There is an ongoing DDoS attack on the Fedora DNS servers. Watch https://w

Re: Startup Problems

stan via users wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 00:26:09 -0400 > Robert McBroom via users wrote: > >> The original install went to  the 495.44 version of the nvidia driver >> but my card GT 710 requires  the 470 version. I see in the journal >> >> May 23 13:26:58 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[2911]:

Re: Boot failure with 6.3.4-101.fc37

John Pilkington wrote: > I just tried 'sudo akmods --force' and it failed. An updated package > > nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.182.03-2.fc37 > > was placed in testing on 27 May. I haven't tried it yet. The changelog for that package is: Added patch for the Linux kernel 6.3 support. So I'd say

Re: find command problems

francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Th following will do I think: > > find . -iname '*pdf' -type f -perm 755 -print0 \ > | xargs -0 chmod 644 Alternately, you can skip -print0 and xargs with: find . -iname '*pdf' -type f -perm 755 -exec chmod 644 {} + -- Todd signature.asc Descript

Re: rsync commands help request

Max Pyziur wrote: > An example of a filename: > rsync: [receiver] mkstemp "/path/to/some/directory/WNYC's Leonard Lopate > Show/.wnyc_lopate.mp3?d=475.0atuCZ" failed: Invalid argument (22) > > It seems blanks and characters such as apostrophes, brackets, etc, cause > problems. ... > The HPFS/NTFS

Re: System networking confusion

Robert McBroom via users wrote: > ~]# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref    Use > Iface > default _gateway    0.0.0.0 UG    100    0    0 eno1 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 100    0    

Re: System upgrade verification

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > This always baffles me... Fedora includes irrelevant keys. For > example, old keys and keys for different arches. Something feels wrong > about trusting them. You don't have to trust them if you don't want. :) Other than for upgrades, they're not automatically used, so tru

Re: System upgrade verification

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > To upgrade from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38 the instructions > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) sa > y: >... >5. When the new GPG key is imported, you are asked to verify the key’s >fingerprint. Refer to https://getfedora.org/sec

Re: Cannot install skypeforlinux

Dario Lesca wrote: > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/dnf-update-failed-skype-gpg-key-expired/81540/3 > > sudo rm /etc/yum.repos.d/skype-stable.repo > rpm -qa gpg-pubkey --qf "gpg-pubkey-%{version}-%{release} %{summary}\n" > sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-df7587c3-576a5c23 > sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-d

Re: Cannot install skypeforlinux

Paul Smith wrote: > Thanks, Doug. I tried as you suggested, but again: > > > [SKIPPED] skypeforlinux_8.97.0.404-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded > error: Verifying a signature using certificate > D4040146BE3972509FD57FC71F3045A5DF7587C3 (Skype Linux Client > Repository

Re: kf5-akonadi errors for the last week?

I wrote: > Tom Horsley wrote: >> Usually this sort of stuff clears up in a couple of days, but I've >> been getting these errors for around a week now and wonder if they >> will ever go away? > > An automated "Fails to install" ticket was filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2203303 > > Th

Re: kf5-akonadi errors for the last week?

Tom Horsley wrote: > Usually this sort of stuff clears up in a couple of days, but I've > been getting these errors for around a week now and wonder if they > will ever go away? An automated "Fails to install" ticket was filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2203303 There's one for rawhide file

Re: DMARC and SPF and DKIM, oh, my!

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 17:22 +0930, Tim via users wrote: >> The list server should, of course, be taking anti-spam efforts of its >> own (only allowed authorised members to post through it). > > Just on that point, policies vary: > > 1) Block unsubscribed users > 2) Al

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2023, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>> (trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant >>> messages only). >> >> This should always be done so that readers don't

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:48 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>     The users list maintains a maximum message length of 60 >>     kilobytes; other Fedora lists may have similar length-limits. >>     Remember that thousands of copies of your me

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> (trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant >> messages only). > > This should always be done so that readers don't have to > plow through dozens of lines from various messages looking >

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > I think it would be wise to send a unified message. Don't say one > thing on the Mailing List Guidelines and another in mail messages. Say > the same thing in both places. Yeah, consistency is defini

Re: Messages held for moderation.

I wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can >> add it to my list. Or if you want to submit a PR: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible >> >> There are some lists where we do pass large emails through sometimes. >> For example the devel

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 08:28:30PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > ...snip... >> >> That could save some time in moderation and make things >> clearer for list members. > > Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:39:39PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 12:50 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>>> I just send the canned response which you can configure in >>>> the Mailman settings (I moderate the Evol

Re: Messages held for moderation.

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 09:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Monitor the queue, and release valid messages. >>> >>> What makes you think Kevin isn't doing that? >> >> I'll be clear: I do do th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >