Robert Nichols via users wrote: > I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean > update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it > installed many updates including a new kernel. After a reboot, much to my > surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running "dnf update" again > resulted in installation of most of these, but also reported: > > Problem 1: package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System > requires qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can > be installed > - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes > qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by > qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System > - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes > qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by > qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch > Problem 2: problem with installed package > qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 > - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires > qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be > installed > - package qgnomeplatform-qt5-0.9.2-18.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires > qgnomeplatform-common = 0.9.2-18.fc40, but none of the providers can be > installed > - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes > qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by > qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from @System > - package qt6-qtbase-common-6.8.1-11.fc40.noarch from updates obsoletes > qgnomeplatform-common <= 0.9.3 provided by > qgnomeplatform-common-0.9.2-18.fc40.noarch from updates > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > qt6-qtbase-common-6.7.2-6.fc40.noarch > > I have tried "dnf update --allowerasing", "dnf update --obsoletes", and even > "dnf autoremove", but nothing gets rid of these problems. > > I have made no changes to any of the config files in fedora-repos-40-2.noarch. > > I am very reluctant to attempt an upgrade to Fedora 41 with the system not in > a cleanly updated state. What to do??
This looks similar to the "Fails to install" bug which was
filed today (but said to be a non-issue by the maintainer):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2341710
If the package is to be obsoleted, it seems to me that the
qt5 subpackage also needs to be obsoleted. Ignoring this
for the duration of F40 would seem to be inappropriate, IMO.
Perhaps someone affected will care to update that ticket to
note that the obsolets appear to be incomplete, at least.
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
