On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:09 AM, JB wrote:
> Hi,
> it is a state of flux.
> I always managed to move to next Fedora with either preupgrade or 'yum
> upgrade'
> methods, but other people are not always so lucky and hit an air pocket.
In my case hitting "air pockets" could mean catastrophe. I'm b
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, JB wrote:
> Marcel Rieux gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
> Hi,
> if you just care about upgrading to next Fedora, try this method:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
Thanks for the suggestion but, I always thought preupgrade was
I tried to upgrade to Fedora 13 with preupgrade, just as I had done
previously with Fedora 11 => 12.
First, I get this kind of result:
preupgrade
Loaded plugins: blacklist, whiteout
No plugin match for: rpm-warm-cache
No plugin match for: remove-with-leaves
No plugin match for: auto-update-debug
I have a somewhat similar "problem" with a wired ADSL connection. I
used to disable the connection by right clicking the icon and
unclicking "Enable connection". Now "Enable connection" is checked and
grayed out. It's impossible to disable the connection by unchecking.
BUT, it you left click and ch
More on this issue:
http://lwn.net/Articles/400746/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
eldavojohn writes
"On June 17th, the X.org team was notified by Invisible Things Lab of
a critical security flaw (PDF) that affected both x86_32 and x86_64
platforms. The flaw deals with escalated privileges of a user process
that has access to the X server. The founder of ITL said of the flaw,
'T
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 04:06 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> Did you notice that Sundaram's never replied to my message explaining
>> that pretending that OOo not having an autoreplace option because of
>> copyright matters is a
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 19 July 2010 21:09, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> This said, as this very message proves, it seems your only goal is to
>> add noise to this thread.
>
> There are 60 posts currently in this thread.
>
> Of those, the coun
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> It has little to do with the venue, and more to do with the tone
> you've brought to it, Marcel.
Yeah, of course, the tone! Whenever I try to bring people's attentio
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/19/2010 10:24 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>>
>> you could ask Rahul Sundaram to use a correct return address. His
>> problem has been going on forever.
>>
>
> Is that your excuse to send abusive and rude m
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Darr wrote:
> Since you won't stop using HTML quotes, I won't bother quoting you at all
> anymore.
David told me teh solution wasn't in Settings, but in the reply
interface. How long did it take to fix the problem? 2 days. Now, maybe
you could ask Rahul Sundaram
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:01 AM, David wrote:
> On 7/18/2010 11:52 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM, David wrote:
>>> On 7/18/2010 9:29 PM, Darr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For some reason Gmail defaults to rtf. That
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, JD wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 08:36 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux > <mailto:m.z.ri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Result:
>>
>>
>> https://mai
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM, David wrote:
> On 7/18/2010 9:29 PM, Darr wrote:
>> Since you won't stop using HTML quotes, I won't bother quoting you at all
>> anymore.
>>
>> If ebay can't stop the site paypalsucks.com, I doubt there's much
>> redhat can (or should) do about the fedorafaq or fed
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, suvayu ali
> wrote:
> I couldn't help but notice, you didn't follow the instructions
> correctly as provided by Nicholas.
Please stop spreading this nonsense all over the place. I followed
instructions as long as I could but then had to find a solution to get o
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> Result:
>
>
> https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)&it=(...)&SID=(...)&RID=(...)&AID=(..<https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=%28...%29&it=%28...%29&SID=%28...%29&RID=%
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Christofer C. Bell <
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The irony, Marcel, is that if your request was actually taken seriously,
> and this list became moderated (which is a headache anyway, since there is
> no "post-posted moderation" possible in a mailing li
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, David wrote:
> On 7/17/2010 9:58 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Darr > <mailto:d...@core.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, 16 July, 2010 @02:48 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
> >
> >
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Darr wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 July, 2010 @23:44 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
>
> > Where can I read the board's position on the name copyright?
>
> You're mixing nomenclatures...
> you can't copyright a name - names can be tra
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> I think the best way for me to improve this list is to provide help
> where it's needed and try to avoid tedious arguments. I don't think
> that anyone made me the hall monitor.
>
> In the end, the only real way to improve the signal to no
In the thread 'Who's moderating this forum? ", On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12
PM, Darr gave a few suggestions to remove the Nvidia driver
and to make Nouveau work.
Since somebody from Nouveau told me on this list that installing Nvidia
drivers is not a one way ticket that will prevent users to get
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Darr wrote:
> On Friday, 16 July, 2010 @02:48 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
>
> > and it will most probably prove my point that while Nouveau developers
> > pretend they work really hard to get new users, installing Kmod is a
> > one way t
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Governance in Fedora is rather light weight and board in particular does
> not interfere in day to day routine work which is led by contributors.
>
Sometimes, the problem is not what they do but what they don't do. There is
no instruct
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Germán A. Racca
>
> Please, it would be nice if you stop sending html mails:
>
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#No_HTML_Mail.2C_Please
>
This page has a link on how to send text messages unfortunately it points
to http://www.expita.com/no
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 12:12 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings
> > mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
2010/7/15 Kevin Fenzi
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:48:08 -0400
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> http://fedorasolved.org/Members/dcr226/nouveau-kmods-mesa-dri-exper
>
RPMFusion updated its site today. Here's what they suggest:
Disable or uninstall the nvidia
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You have a problem. Several people offered you solutions but you are
> reluctant to try it out.
>
What is the solution to a non-existing tab? One person said 3.2.1 would
settle the problem. I explained why I wouldn't install it now.
May
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:13 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > The prerequisite is that Red Hat employees have some common sense
> > themselves... Of course, we all know that Fedora being an entity
> > completely separate
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:14:07 -0400
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Alan Cox
> wrote:
> >
> > > > Ok, so that's why it's OK if it doesn't work! Windows at $35
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm sure plenty of people think it's obvious nonsense. However, moderatiom
> rules don't forbid nonsense AFAIAA.
>
Absolutely but since this nonsense often degenerates in a flood of the same
kind, some very plain Fedora users just as myself r
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > This looks like you were at some site that had a 0 length file called
> > 'bind' and when you clicked on it it downloaded... it uses the numbers
> > each time
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>>
>>> I was referring to the June post not to answer it but to give a flagrant
>> example of some omnipresent nonsense. Of course, I might be
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 05:27 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > Is there any word (that you've heard by rumor) that indicates what the
> > possible immediate intellectual property problem may be? The bug
> > report doesn't specify anything.
>
> I ha
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:48 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > YOU say it's a solution. I don't know you, I don't deal with you. If
> > Fedora believes it's a solution, I'll apply it.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > Check closely, I didn't split the thread. Somebody, unaware of the
> > result, I suppose, removed "OT:" from the title line. It's unfortunate
> > but those things happen.
>
> No. You did split the thread by starting yet another discus
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On *Thu Jun 24 01:36:32 UTC 2010, **Joel Rees* wrote about there
> > being no instructions to revert from Nvidia to Nouveau drivers:
>
> I answered him with a link that answered his question, but he didn't
> reply if that solved his issue.
ught maybe somebody would drop a few lines to protest this obvious
nonsense. 3 weeks later, nothing.
What usually happens is some people add more of the same.
>
> On 15 July 2010 22:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> On 07/16/2010 03:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> >
>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 03:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't understand how come nobody responsible for this group tries to
> > make discussions move forward to better results for Red Hat, whether
>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok, so that's why it's OK if it doesn't work! Windows at $35 (OEM) for
> 5-7
> > years seems a better alternative though. Red Hat salesmen must be really
> > competent. I certainly couldn't sell one Red Hat copy for sure.
>
> If you want to run
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Christofer C. Bell <
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>
>> But that's just me and, of course, I'm a troll. I mean, is there any logic
>> in what I'm saying? Of
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:44:02 -0400
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> > Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying "Download complete" when I
> > downloaded nothing.
>
> From what application? Can you tell by it'
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:49 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > I only install Fedora's available downloads. I figure there might be
> > problems using the latest versions if there not made available. I hope
> > 3.2.1
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Christofer C. Bell <
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>>
>> How does Red Hat manages to ask thousand of dollars from companies when
>> Linux's main word processin
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:47 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > You have OOo 3.2.1 available on CentOS 5 when only 3.1.1 is available
> > on Fedora 12? Rather surprising!
>
> OO 3.2.1 is readily available for do
Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying "Download complete" when I
downloaded nothing. So, I checked the Downloads directory where, since 04:12
till 04:57 today I have 7 bind 0 byte files. I don't know what time this is
since I received that last download notice about an hour ago and it is 17:43
lo
Since I'm in rant mode, I might as well continue. There's a lot to be said
about how Fedora doesn't work!
On *Thu Jun 24 01:36:32 UTC 2010, **Joel Rees* wrote about there being no
instructions to revert from Nvidia to Nouveau drivers:
"No, re-installing to clear up a mess that may take more time
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 15:17 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > It's no mystery why "no one knows how to make autocorrections," the
> > functionality doesn't exist. It's documented in the help files how to
> > something similar, but the nece
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Christofer C. Bell <
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > No. as the tile and the line above say, I mean in OOo 3.3.1
> >
> > Still no answer to this question. Isn
As everybody suggested I wrote to RPMFusion on how to make a clean uninstall
of Kmod Nvidia. E.g.: suggested by:
*Alan Evans, who wrote:
*
"It is their responsibility to explain how to uninstall that software. Simple."
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-June/376088.html*
Todd Z
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 03:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Smith, Herb
> wrote:
> >
> >> *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
> >> users-boun...@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 04:33 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > Firefox is often killed by signal 11:
> >
> > Package:firefox-3.5.10-1.fc12
> > Latest Crash:Mon 12 Jul 2010 11:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Smith, Herb wrote:
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Marcel Rieux
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:26 PM
> *To:* Community support for Fedora users
> *Subject:* OT:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 14 July 2010 21:25, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> > I often use the zoom in Firefox, Is there any way to make Firefox
> remember a default zoom?
> > Is there a keyboard shortcut to navigate to the right of the screen whe
Firefox is often killed by signal 11:
Package:firefox-3.5.10-1.fc12
Latest Crash:Mon 12 Jul 2010 11:45:16 PM
Command:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.5/firefox --sm-config-prefix
/firefox-P8PZv6/ --sm-client-id
10a7781fec216fecbb1278870778770015530047 --screen 0
Reason: Pro
I often type voyels too fast so I'd like errors such as "teh" to be
automatically corrected to "the". I searched the web but all the solutions I
found involved using menu entries that are not in OOo 3.1.1. Does anybody
know how to do this?
I often use the zoom in Firefox, Is there any way to make
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> One way is to back up your data and reinstall Fedora. That's simple to
> explain and reliable. It's an annoying amount of work, but it might have
> taken less of your time as things turned out.
>
Reinstalling to install a driver? Are y
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:39:16 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you
> get
> > >
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> there are multiple ways to install nvidias drivers. Its really not simple
> to
> cover them all. some ways like using the installer directly from nvidia
> replace a bunch of Xorg bits
>
It's most likely that people who have installed wi
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 05:34:05 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > As a simple user, I'm not in a position to fight RPMFusion. So, if the
> > Nouveau developers don't want to provide instructions on how to install
&
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>
> reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you get
> Nouveau since its the default.
>
How do you, for instance, reverse:
su -
mv /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r)-nouveau.img
dracut /bo
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:55:32 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > And RPMfusion provides instructions on how to get Nouveau out of the way
> to
> > do a clean install. Why, as I was explaining to Dennis
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>
> I'll check.
>
The question has been asked here on the 17th:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/2010-June/000682.html
There's one reply to the message, it's somebody explaining Fedora 12
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> That makes no sense. If you ask them for information about why this
> particular kmod package was delayed, I doubt that they would give you
> an answer anything like you suggest.
>
Oops, sorry! I read too fast and thought, because of pr
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> We have developers working really hard to make things just work in a
> completely free and open way. they are fight a tough battle that is part
> of
> what defines fedora for what it is.
The best way to win this "tough battle" is to pr
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > (Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding
> nvidia
> > kernel module was provided. Not a word anywhere as to wh
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding nvidia
kernel module was provided. Not a word anywhere as to why the module wasn't
provided with the kernel as usual.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 16:25:38 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > Another thing that would be nice is an howto on disinstalling nvidia
> drivers
> > made available on Fedora's or rpmfusion's si
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a repository not supported by Red
> > Hat/Fedora, could block a kernel update.
>
> The
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> If you think that getting an updated
> kernel installed without the corresponding nVidia kmod being installed is
> a problem, you could suggest that they use conflicts to block those
> updates.
As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a re
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
> Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
> update and the packages from rpmfusion
>
No. Usually, the kernel and the module arrive at the sam
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
> > version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion ha
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 07:07 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > So, neither you nor Ed Grashko have the problem with Fedora 13. Rex
> > Dieter doesn't say which version he's using. (I use F12).
> >
> > I suppose, after
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting
> because
> > the one in testing -- posted yesterday!!
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> This has nothing to do with "who broke what". This has everything to do
> with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux variants, mainstream
> enough for the common person to use.
>
Have you seen Taxi Driver? There's a reply where De Ni
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Steven P. Ulrick <
lists-fed...@afolkey2.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So. if somebody could fill t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > So. if somebody could fill the bug report, I would appreciate. It's
> > not an activity I'll ever get really good at, I afraid.
> >
> > P.s.: Maybe
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
> On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
> > On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
> >> yum check-updat
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
>
> Fedora provides you, free of charge, a perfectly good, working,
> operating system. And they maintain that system. As provided.
>
> You modified it by adding a package, or packages, from a non Fedora
> site(s). Fedora provided improvements a
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> > I use Klipper in Gnome. When I do a search in Klipper, the search box
> > doesn't disappear and hides the first entry until the computer is
> > rebooted. I found no instructions anywhere
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
>
> Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
> interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new
> kernel update is *not* offered if the corresponding kmod package that
> uses it is not available?
>
Som
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
> Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
> update and the packages from rpmfusion because they need the kernel
> source to build their packag
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Darr wrote:
> On Monday, 14 June, 2010 @ 23:13 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
>
> > Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
> >
> [snip]
> > kernel x86_64 2.6.32.14-127.fc12
>
>
>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 04:43 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > =
> >
> > So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it
> > will still be possible to b
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 06:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
> > Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > For this issue you are really complaining to the wrong people.
> kmod-nvidia
&g
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it will
> > still be possible to boot with the present kernel. .. but not w
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Perhaps or perhaps you are seeing problems others have not. In either
> case, file a bug report with the details would be useful.
>
Thanks to Ed's answer, I could figure this is a possibility. So, I made a
few tests.
1) I rebooted.
I s
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 07:00 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > More fun with Klipper!
> >
> > Just as it used to do before, most of the time, it's impossible to
> > paste in gedit unless the first entry is reselected.
> &g
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
==
PackageArch
Version RepositorySize
=
More fun with Klipper!
Just as it used to do before, most of the time, it's impossible to paste in
gedit unless the first entry is reselected.
In OOo, either using the middle mouse button or CTRL + V, what appears are a
empty spaces or ^^^ ^
Please don't tell me I'm a ranter. I kno
I use Klipper in Gnome. When I do a search in Klipper, the search box
doesn't disappear and hides the first entry until the computer is rebooted.
I found no instructions anywhere on how to close it. Is there a default way
to close boxes?
Klipepr's help says:
"You can search through the clipboard
New updates today and the PYCURL ERROR 6 comes back again.
It looks like this:
Total download size: 87 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/updates/12/x86_64/kdebase-4.4.3-2.fc12.1.x86_64.rpm:
[Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 6 - ""
Trying other mirror.
http://mir
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Friday 07 May 2010 06:06:39 you wrote:
> > > If I were you, I'd complain to the cbc.ca webmaster and tell him to
> fix it.
> >
> > It's going to be an uphill battle:
> > Linux
> >
> >- At this time Linux is not supported.
> >
> > htt
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I'm finding that this page crashes konqueror.
>
> http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/2010/05/pandora-radio-on-n900-pypianobar.html
>
> Can anyone confirm this ?
>
No problem with Fedora 12, Konqueror or Firefox.
--
users mailing list
users@list
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010 14:21:06 Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > I try to view this video:
> >
> > http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/lies/video.html
> >
> > and don't succeed.
> >
> > I was able to get a
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Peter Larsen wrote:
>
> > Generally, "users" shouldn't care about how/where things are stored.
> > They use OpenOffice, mail, browsers and applications. It's not the users
> > job to configure the box and do system administration.
>
> I find
I try to view this video:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/lies/video.html
and don't succeed.
I was able to get an mms URL at Akamai, but here's what happens, even using
mplayer directly:
mplayer mms://
a1866.v8752c.c8752.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/1866/8752/0/origin.media.cbc.ca/windows/fifth/media/lies2.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Peter Larsen <
plar...@famlarsen.homelinux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 22:58 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > That's not what I said. I said I've been using Fedora and
> > RedHat long
> > befo
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 11:23 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > I have selected my disk partitioning for a long time and when new
> > wizardry comes along, I always wonder how much help it's goin
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Hugh Caley wrote:
> LVM can be very handy for desktops. If you run out of space on / (or any
> other mount that uses LVM) you can attach another disk, add it to LVM, and
> expand the filesystem with resize2fs. Easy and quick.
>
Before I bought my present comput
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Kevin J. Cummings <
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2010 01:08 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> You can always choose to not use LVM when you install Fedora, but you
> have to be comfortable with selecting the advanced disk partiti
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
