On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 21:37 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> Removing the card worked. That's evidence, an argument, not proof,
> that the card was bad.
Did you also try putting it back in again?
Back in my early days of fixing up people's PCs, reseating cards was
often needed. Few cases wer
On 4/27/25 10:35 PM, Tim wrote:
And "systemctl status display-manager" says it's using GDM.
I copied that one down! Thank you!
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.
Tim:
>> Yes, I know we're reticent to go rebooting if we really do not need to.
Mike Wright:
> In early microsoft days (still?) reboot was a mantra. For linux users
> uptime was a badge of honor and proudly displayed in mail footers.
[tim@rocky ~]$ uptime
15:35:38 up 51 days, 5:10, 13 users,
Tim via users:
> > My internal DNS can obviously answer my LAN addressing queries, and
> > it's set up to also resolve queries about internet addresses. It runs
> > as a full server. No public server can answer queries about my LAN.
Marco Moock:
> Then only have the internal DNS set in your OS.
On 4/27/25 8:12 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 4/27/25 2:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 21:45:04 -0600, home user via users wrote:
The login GUI that shows up after booting is completed shows "Super
User" as one of the 2 user names that I can choose to log in as.
Pleas
On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 13:58 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Having no mobile computers, and none using wireless networking, I find myself
> to
> be the only network manager needed, and barely so, so have no network manager
> installed
It can still manage that *one* connection. And there are (or were
On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 02:02 +, Jonathan via users wrote:
> Have you tried googling your issue? It looks like there should be a
> setting for it in Mate as discussed here.
"here" *was* a link to a reddit page about Ubuntu, which shows one of
the drawbacks with HTML mail (disappearing links), a
On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 20:37 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Every time I have had two going, it has been an
> unpredictable mess. This not suppose to be the
> case?
Installed doesn't mean active...
Oddly enough I have two installed, but only one is set to go.
Looking on an old installati
home user composed on 2025-04-27 21:28 (UTC-0600):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> home user composed on 2025-04-26 16:01 (UTC-0600):
>>> The workstation rebooted fine without the card. No problems so far. So
>>> the CPU does have integrated graphics, which answers Felix and Samuel.
>>> There is one c
On 4/27/25 4:12 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
On 26 Apr 2025, at 01:38, home user via users
wrote:
I gather from the Fedora docs that I should use firewalld or
firewalld-config. I have both. But Fedora docs does not give me
enough detail. I am not an IT professional. What specifically should
On 4/26/25 1:23 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/26/25 9:22 AM, home user via users wrote:
(F-42 stand-alone workstation; gnome)
good morning,
My F-42 workstation had 21 mixed crashes in a few hours late
yesterday, and more in a matter of minutes just a few minutes ago. It
was installed yesterday
On 4/27/25 3:08 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 11:21 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/27/25 10:48 AM, Beartooth via users wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi Beartooth,
from the command line, run:
$ rpm -qa \*dm
and repo
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Fedora Workstation installation process offers creating a user account,
> but you need to fill in a real name yourself.
home user via users wrote:
> "offers"? I did not get any sense of having a choice; it seemed to be
> required.
Well, yes, any choice is ephemeral.
On 4/26/25 5:10 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
home user composed on 2025-04-26 16:01 (UTC-0600):
The workstation rebooted fine without the card. No problems so far. So
the CPU does have integrated graphics, which answers Felix and Samuel.
There is one cost: this was a 2-monitor workstation; now it's
On 4/27/25 2:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 21:45:04 -0600, home user via users wrote:
The login GUI that shows up after booting is completed shows "Super
User" as one of the 2 user names that I can choose to log in as.
Please don't turn this into a guessing game. Give som
Oh yeah -- that would do it. If they changed the login manager then the new LM
would be using default config, so you'll need to refer to the documentation for
the Slim LM. [Arch Wiki](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/SLiM) is a great
resource for this.
On 4/26/25 1:20 AM, Ranjan Maitra via user
Have you tried googling your issue? It looks like there should be a setting for
it in Mate as discussed
[here](https://www.reddit.com/r/UbuntuMATE/comments/11tjz9r/how_to_remove_login_window_from_ubantu_mate/).
Additionally, it looks like if you installed a keyring that might also affect
whethe
On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 11:21 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/27/25 10:48 AM, Beartooth via users wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Beartooth,
> > >
> > > from the command line, run:
> > > $ rpm -qa \*dm
> > >
> > > and report bac
On 4/27/25 12:28 PM, Beartooth via users wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:21:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/27/25 10:48 AM, Beartooth via users wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi Beartooth,
from the command line, run:
$ rpm -qa \*dm
and r
> On 27 Apr 2025, at 18:37, Marco Moock wrote:
>
> I do run additional SPI firewalls
Is this a commercial or open source SPI firewall?
Barry
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:21:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/27/25 10:48 AM, Beartooth via users wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Beartooth,
>>>
>>> from the command line, run:
>>> $ rpm -qa \*dm
>>>
>>> and report back what pops up
Michael,
On 2025-04-28 04:42, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:59:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what
> happens?
No difference / improvement.
Then I repeat my request to see example output.
Your first key's stop pos
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:59:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> > If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what
> > happens?
>
>
> No difference / improvement.
Then I repeat my request to see example output.
Your first key's stop position is at end of line, which is very generous.
On 4/27/25 10:48 AM, Beartooth via users wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi Beartooth,
from the command line, run:
$ rpm -qa \*dm
and report back what pops up~# rpm -qa \*dm
Hi Todd!
I get
libblockdev-dm-3.3.0-3.fc42.x86_64
mdadm-4
François Patte composed on 2025-04-27 12:46 (UTC+0200):
> Once upon a time, there were a file ifcfg-xxx were the ethernet config
> was clearly written but times have changed!
Having no mobile computers, and none using wireless networking, I find myself to
be the only network manager needed, and
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi Beartooth,
>
> from the command line, run:
> $ rpm -qa \*dm
>
> and report back what pops up~# rpm -qa \*dm
Hi Todd!
I get
libblockdev-dm-3.3.0-3.fc42.x86_64
mdadm-4.3-7.fc42.x86_64
lightdm-1.32.0-13.fc42
Am 27.04.2025 um 10:52:53 Uhr schrieb David King:
> I would disagree. Operating systems have flaws that hackers can
> exploit. If a computer is connected directly to the internet then
> hackers can exploit those flaws, regardless of what you may or may
> not having running on the machine. Def
On 4/27/25 3:46 AM, François Patte wrote:
Le 27/04/2025 à 07:49, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
On 4/26/25 2:05 PM, François Patte wrote:
Le 24/04/2025 à 23:01, Jonathan Billings a écrit :
On Apr 24, 2025, at 08:28, François Patte
wrote:
am a little bit confused about the dns : I have systemd-resolved
Michael,
On 2025-04-28 00:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:02:47 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
sort: text ordering performed using simple byte comparison
What's your locale?
C
If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what happens?
No difference / imp
On 4/27/25 01:07, Tim via users wrote:
Yes, I know we're reticent to go rebooting if we really do not need to.
In early microsoft days (still?) reboot was a mantra. For linux users
uptime was a badge of honor and proudly displayed in mail footers.
--
___
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:02:47 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> sort: text ordering performed using simple byte comparison
What's your locale?
If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what happens?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.f
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:53 AM David King wrote:
> On 4/27/25 1:05 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:37:38 -0600 home user via users
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I have no services running, as far as I know. I did not install any.
> > Then there is not need for a router, NAT or anythin
Am 27.04.2025 um 20:42:23 Uhr schrieb Tim via users:
> My internal DNS can obviously answer my LAN addressing queries, and
> it's set up to also resolve queries about internet addresses. It runs
> as a full server. No public server can answer queries about my LAN.
Then only have the internal DN
On 4/27/25 1:05 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:37:38 -0600 home user via users
wrote:
I have no services running, as far as I know. I did not install any.
Then there is not need for a router, NAT or anything else.
I would disagree. Operating systems have flaws that hackers
On 2025-04-27 21:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:12:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
People,
For the attached file these work:
sort -k 1.11,1.18n t
sort -k 1.3,1.6n t
but this doesn't:
sort -k 1.8 -k 1.3,1.6n t
Why is this?
Add option --debug, show the output
> On 26 Apr 2025, at 01:38, home user via users
> wrote:
>
> I gather from the Fedora docs that I should use firewalld or
> firewalld-config. I have both. But Fedora docs does not give me enough
> detail. I am not an IT professional. What specifically should I do to keep
> unwanted peop
home user via users wrote:
> > I gather from the Fedora docs that I should use firewalld or
> > firewalld-config. I have both. But Fedora docs does not give me
> > enough detail. I am not an IT professional. What specifically
> > should I do to keep unwanted people and things out?
Barry Scott
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:12:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> People,
>
> For the attached file these work:
>
> sort -k 1.11,1.18n t
> sort -k 1.3,1.6n t
>
> but this doesn't:
>
> sort -k 1.8 -k 1.3,1.6n t
>
> Why is this?
Add option --debug, show the output you get, and describe wha
> On 27 Apr 2025, at 09:20, Tim via users wrote:
>
> The system will usually have a default server it queries for
> everything, and if it doesn't respond (at all) it will try one of the
> others. If it does respond (even if it doesn't have and results), it
> has answered and the others won't b
On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 12:17 +0200, Marco Moock wrote:
> Then you have a general problem. DNS is intended to give back the same
> results for the same query - regardless which server you ask.
Yes, and no.
My internal DNS can obviously answer my LAN addressing queries, and
it's set up to also resol
Le 27/04/2025 à 07:49, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
On 4/26/25 2:05 PM, François Patte wrote:
Le 24/04/2025 à 23:01, Jonathan Billings a écrit :
On Apr 24, 2025, at 08:28, François Patte
wrote:
am a little bit confused about the dns : I have systemd-resolved
installed and when I list the content of
Am 27.04.2025 um 10:57:30 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott:
> > On 27 Apr 2025, at 09:20, Tim via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > The system will usually have a default server it queries for
> > everything, and if it doesn't respond (at all) it will try one of
> > the others. If it does respond (even if it doe
People,
For the attached file these work:
sort -k 1.11,1.18n t
sort -k 1.3,1.6n t
but this doesn't:
sort -k 1.8 -k 1.3,1.6n t
Why is this?
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: p...@pricom.com.auE_20.0_GB_20060611.smartctl
3_40.0_GB_20061217.smartct
On Sat, 2025-04-26 at 16:45 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> # netstat -ltuvpe
> Active Internet connections (only servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
> State User Inode PID/Program name
> tcp0 0 _localdnsproxy:domain 0.0.0.0:*
On Sat, 2025-04-26 at 23:05 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Current DNS Server: 192.168.1.1
> DNS Servers: 80.67.169.12 80.67.169.40 192.168.1.1
Having multiple DNS servers, like that, *can* be a problem. It depends
on your use case.
The system will usually have a default server it querie
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 21:45:04 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> The login GUI that shows up after booting is completed shows "Super
> User" as one of the 2 user names that I can choose to log in as.
Please don't turn this into a guessing game. Give some details about
that user account based on
On Sat, 2025-04-26 at 17:33 +0200, Marco Moock wrote:
> An upgrade needs a reboot anyway.
This!!
Yes, I know we're reticent to go rebooting if we really do not need to.
But a system upgrade is a complete interruption to whatever you were
doing beforehand. You may as well reboot before starting,
47 matches
Mail list logo
