errors after wakeup from suspend

Hi I have fedora 13 on HP NC8000 laptop. most are working well, but after wakeup from suspend, it always shows errore as following, ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0) ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16) eth0: no IPv6 routers present eth4: no IPv6 routers present ata3: link is s

Re: Another funny update?

On Friday 18 June 2010 09:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I don't know if there is a GUI way to do the following, but you can do it > with an editor. > > To change whether or not the new kernel is the default for the next boot > after an install edit /etc/sysconfig/kernel and change > UPDATEDEFAULT

Re: Another funny update?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 21:22:59 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > On Friday 18 June 2010 09:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > You can also set your system so that the default boot kernel doesn't change > > when there is a kernel update. This protects you from the kmod being > > release

Re: Another funny update?

Hi Bruno, On Friday 18 June 2010 09:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > You can also set your system so that the default boot kernel doesn't change > when there is a kernel update. This protects you from the kmod being released > late problem at the cost of having to manually switch boot kernels after

Re: Another funny update?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a repository not supported by Red > Hat/Fedora, could block a kernel update. They can using 'conflicts' in the spec file. If the kmod is installed first, this can block updated kernels from b

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/19/2010 05:44 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:37 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: > > >> Its true that the 64 bit build of some apps can be slower than the 32 >> bit builds. However, its rarely more than a few percent. Hardly >> noticeable, really. On the other hand, many

Backing store issue in FC12

Dear All, I have installed FC12 64 bit on my  PC. When i am longing into remote PC and trying to open the graphics applications on remote PC, The window becomes black . I have put Option "Backingstore" "on" in my xorg.conf in Device section. But now the moment I log into remoter M/C

Re: XSANE image save problem

Yup, that did it. Thanks. I will try to find out what happened and post that as well. But for now, we're back in business via GIMP! Dick On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:01:07 +0800 > Dick Roark wrote: > > > does anyone have the very > > probably s

Re: Another funny update?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > If you think that getting an updated > kernel installed without the corresponding nVidia kmod being installed is > a problem, you could suggest that they use conflicts to block those > updates. As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a re

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

On 06/18/2010 05:26 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Sorry I was in hurry this morn. >> >> The driver for that is 195.36.31 >> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html >> >> It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video >> > Hi, > I am using the 195.

Re: XSANE image save problem

On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:01:07 +0800 Dick Roark wrote: > does anyone have the very > probably simple solution to this problem Well, I'm not seeing the problem, so this may not be a solution, but you could try running gimp instead of xsane and using the File > Create > Xsane... menu to bring up xsan

XSANE image save problem

I have reinstalled xsane. Everything but the image save function works fine. xsane produces a good image but when I try to save it, the resulting image is compressed laterally with the remaining width blacked out. This is repeatable and I have seen references to the problem in the various forums,

Re: NFS problem in FC13

I had a problem with this, my server running fc12, client running fc13. The nfs mount worked, but all the files were read only and the owner.group for all files were set to nobody. I used the '-o nfsvers=3' option on the client. -- gary On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, M A Young wrote: > On Tue, 1

RE: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

>Sorry I was in hurry this morn. > >The driver for that is 195.36.31 >http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html > >It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video Hi, I am using the 195.36.24-1 akmod which is nearly as new... Thanks! jlc -- users mailing

RE: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

>What's the output of glxinfo? Gilboa, I am guessing this has something to do with the fact that I disable the Laptops built in LCD and enable only a external LCD? The output is rather long, but: # glxinfo name of display: :0.0 Error: glXCreateContext failed 64 GLX Visuals visual x bf lv rg

Re: Another funny update?

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:10:47 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > I wrote to a certain Dan at rpmfusion, but I dougt I'll get an answer. I'm > sure rpmfusion is fully aware that they don't offer teh nvidia module for > the present kernel. and I would make a bet that people at Fedora are well > aw

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

Mike Chambers writes: On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:37 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: Its true that the 64 bit build of some apps can be slower than the 32 bit builds. However, its rarely more than a few percent. Hardly noticeable, really. On the other hand, many compute intensive applications tha

Squid implementation small problem

As per the page: http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/squid-privoxy/index.html I am trying to install it. But one thing is that 'CustomizeGoogle Firefox extension (http://www.customizegoogle.com/)' doesn't work with the Firefox 3.5 in Fedora Core 11. So is there any fix for it so that squid wi

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

O> Agreed. First, the 64-bit OS itself should be a bit faster than a 32-bit > OS on the same platform. But, in my experience with 64-bit going back 16 > years there are some applications that will run faster if built for > 32-bit and some will run faster if built for 64-bit. There are some > tr

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:37 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: > Its true that the 64 bit build of some apps can be slower than the 32 > bit builds. However, its rarely more than a few percent. Hardly > noticeable, really. On the other hand, many compute intensive > applications that can make good u

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

On 06/18/2010 11:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Have you been here yet? >> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html >> >> >> See if any of these helps >> > Is that url a typo? > Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix... > > I am guessing it won't help:) >

Re: Adobe (Temporarily?)... VHS vs Beta

On 18 June 2010 21:59, Genes MailLists wrote: > > >  Where is the driver for VHS or Betamax tapes ? > >  yum install betamax >     betamax is dead > >  yum install vhs >     vhs not found - did you mean devhelp.i686  ? > >  Is this a little off topic maybe :-) rpm -q --obsoletes dvd betamax.x8

Re: Adobe (Temporarily?)... VHS vs Beta

Where is the driver for VHS or Betamax tapes ? yum install betamax betamax is dead yum install vhs vhs not found - did you mean devhelp.i686 ? Is this a little off topic maybe :-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription option

Re: Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux

On 06/19/2010 04:03 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Patrick Bartek wrote: > >> --- On Tue, 6/15/10, Dale J. Chatham wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/15/2010 12:28 AM, Patrick >>> Bartek wrote: >>> [snip] >>> There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer >>> video re

Re: Unexplained temporary freezes in Thunderbird Fedora 13

On 06/14/2010 03:25 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: (2) Try latest 3.1.1.pre from upstream - I have no problems with it (32 bit only fyi) .. So far, after upgrading to 3.1-0.2.rc2.fc14 it seems to be more responsive to mouse clicks and no freezes (but I have not been using it long enough to re

Re: [389-users] attribute name case sensitivity

Mike Li wrote: > Fedora DS 7.1 on Linux. Attributes are any attributes I want to add. It should depend. Some attributes are case sensitive, some are not. Fedora DS 7.1? Can you upgrade to a recently release of 389? > Tried it also on lbe, they are all silently turned into all lower cases. > > On

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for replying. > > Just making sure I'm using the right utility. To reinitialize the > directory, I use the ldif2db.pl Perl script right? Yes, if you need to restore _all_ servers from an LDIF backup. The reason I say _all_ is t

Re: repeatable kernel freeze

Joe Conway wrote: > On 06/16/2010 05:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Based on the assumption that you are experiencing a kernel crash, there >> are two ways of obtaining diagnostics: >> >> 1) A serial console. Going retro, getting a null-modem adapter, and >> connecting the serial port of the aili

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 04:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Jerry Feldman said: >> But, in my experience with 64-bit going back 16 >> years there are some applications that will run faster if built for >> 32-bit and some will run faster if built for 64-bit. > In the specific case of i386 to x

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

Once upon a time, Jerry Feldman said: > But, in my experience with 64-bit going back 16 > years there are some applications that will run faster if built for > 32-bit and some will run faster if built for 64-bit. In the specific case of i386 to x86_64, you get better performance for 64 bit in m

Re: Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux

Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Tue, 6/15/10, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > >> On 06/15/2010 12:28 AM, Patrick >> Bartek wrote: >> [snip] >>> There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer >> video recording and/or playback formats. Ultimately, >> the consumer chose which format it preferred.

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Hi Rich, Thanks for replying. Just making sure I'm using the right utility. To reinitialize the directory, I use the ldif2db.pl Perl script right? - David On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am hitting an issue with reiniti

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi all, > > I am hitting an issue with reinitializing the directory database. > > Basically I have two directory servers and they're configured using > multi-master replication scheme. > > When I reinitialize the directory database, the directory became > inaccessible.

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Hi all, I am hitting an issue with reinitializing the directory database. Basically I have two directory servers and they're configured using multi-master replication scheme. When I reinitialize the directory database, the directory became inaccessible. I think it is related with my multi-maste

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 03:21 AM, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote: > 2010/6/18 Sam Varshavchik: >> Minor differences are that 64 bit applications are slightly faster, and 64 >> bit lets you use more RAM. > Not always it's faster, everything depend of application one will be > faster one will be slower. > Agreed. Fir

Debugging 32-bit applications on an x86_64 system

I'm trying to debug inspect googleearth (a 32-bit application) using gdb on an x86_64 system. Gdb starts OK, but when I attempt to run googleearth, it reports that a large number of debuginfo packages are missing with messages like: Missing separate debuginfo for /lib/libexpat.so.1

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On 06/18/2010 11:40 AM, stan wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:14:44 -0400 > "Roger K. Wells" wrote: > > >> On 06/18/2010 04:22 AM, Dj YB wrote: >> >>> On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote > if there not already a bug report, please fill one and pass the > link so we can co

RE: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

>Have you been here yet? >http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html > > >See if any of these helps Is that url a typo? Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix... I am guessing it won't help:) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 18/06/10 18:35, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 06/18/2010 04:32 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> I have not had problems running 64bit flash using: >> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 > > Except for the published security hole it gives your system. > Granted, you may not have visi

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 04:32 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > I have not had problems running 64bit flash using: > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 Except for the published security hole it gives your system. Granted, you may not have visited a site which exploits it, yet, but, someday,

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is >> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy >> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org >> server that Fedora 13 ships.

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is >> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy >> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org >> server that Fedora 13 ships.

RE: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

>Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is >no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy >driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org >server that Fedora 13 ships. Well, the release notes say its supported? Equivale

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm > fusion doesn't work with fgfs? Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy driver, but their legacy

Re: fgfs opengl issue w/ nvidia fx1400

On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 23:40 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm > fusion doesn't work with fgfs? > > When starting fgfs it suggests the card doesn't support opengl? > Pretty sure that card does ogl... I am using the akmod as the

Re: USB Printer Install help needed

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:41 -0500, Smith, Herb wrote: > I have a Xerox Phaser 6130 printer. It does not seem to be recognized > by my F13 install (fully updated on a Dell Dimension desktop). I can > go to Admin -> Printing, but the only options are printer port or > serial port. I could also spe

Re: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

Couldn't agree more. On 06/18/2010 10:20 AM, Terry Polzin wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:13 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > >> I cannot remember the package, but there is a package that will let >> you run Windows drivers under Linux. I had to do that to get a >> wireless card working on

USB Printer Install help needed

I have a Xerox Phaser 6130 printer. It does not seem to be recognized by my F13 install (fully updated on a Dell Dimension desktop). I can go to Admin -> Printing, but the only options are printer port or serial port. I could also specify a URI, but I do not know what the URI specification fo

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:14:44 -0400 "Roger K. Wells" wrote: > On 06/18/2010 04:22 AM, Dj YB wrote: > > On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote: > > if there not already a bug report, please fill one and pass the > > link so we can comment. > > > > > I'll be glad to. I have never

RE: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

Thanks for your response. Wow. Even easier than the method I got via Jerry's link. I'll keep that in mind for next time. Thanks all!!! S -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of John W. Linville Sent: Fr

RE: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

Rockin!!! Thanks so much Terry! This was indeed my answer. I'm WAPin'! Have fun! PS: I'm Blown Away by how quickly I got multiple solutions to my problem. We're talking less than 30 minutes! The Linux and Fedora communities ROCK!!! -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedorap

Re: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26:07AM -0400, Terry Polzin wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:20 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:13 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > > > I cannot remember the package, but there is a package that will let > > > you run Windows drivers under Linux.

Re: OpenOffice Crash - bad Java JRE

On 06/18/2010 04:14 PM, Smith, Herb wrote: > I have a new F13 install, fully updated. > > OpenOffice crashes saying that the Java JRE is bad and that I should install > a new one and point OpenOffice to it. > > The only JRE that I have on the machine is what came with the F13 install. > Is thi

Re: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:20 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:13 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > > I cannot remember the package, but there is a package that will let > > you run Windows drivers under Linux. I had to do that to get a > > wireless card working on an Ubuntu machi

Re: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:13 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > I cannot remember the package, but there is a package that will let > you run Windows drivers under Linux. I had to do that to get a > wireless card working on an Ubuntu machine (get EMC (www.linuxcnc.org) > or something better working on

OpenOffice Crash - bad Java JRE

I have a new F13 install, fully updated. OpenOffice crashes saying that the Java JRE is bad and that I should install a new one and point OpenOffice to it. The only JRE that I have on the machine is what came with the F13 install. Is this a known bug? Any suggestions other than installing the

Re: Help getting WiFi working on laptop

I cannot remember the package, but there is a package that will let you run Windows drivers under Linux. I had to do that to get a wireless card working on an Ubuntu machine (get EMC (www.linuxcnc.org) or something better working on Fedora and we'll talk). If you can't dredge it up, I'll try

Help getting WiFi working on laptop

Greetings, I've got Fedora 13 installed on my new Dell Studio laptop. I haven't had any other issues with the install, and wired networking is working fine. I can't, however, get wireless networking to work. The card in the laptop is a " Intel Centrino WiMAX 6250 Advanced-N +". It appear

Re: problems for installation on a dell e6510

thanks for your answer the dell e6500 works perfectly i have found a bug in bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580563 i will try soon the work around Le 18/06/2010 15:30, Brian Millett a écrit : > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:57 +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: >> i just receive a dell

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 02:51 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >>> The areas where 64-bit apps is not a good idea is on some >>> applications, in particular Java-based apps. >> >> In most cases that's not really true any more, because of compressed >> OOPs. > > I just saw that.. Interesting and looks to eliminate thos

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: [snip] > Even if you're going to run an app in 32-bit mode, you're still better > off with a 64-bit kernel. Agreed... > >> The areas where 64-bit apps is not a good idea is on some >> applications, in particular Java-based apps. > > In most ca

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 03:21 PM, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote: > 2010/6/18 Sam Varshavchik: > >> Minor differences are that 64 bit applications are slightly faster, and 64 >> bit lets you use more RAM. >> > Not always it's faster, everything depend of application one will be > faster one will be slower.

Re: problems for installation on a dell e6510

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:57 +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: > i just receive a dell e6510 today and i m unable to install fedora on it > > indeed we installed all our machine through cobbler. > we boot pxe got the the vmlinuz and initrd file but after the installers > says that there s no network c

Re: [389-users] Restart of replicated servers

Mitja Mihelic( wrote: > Hi! > > We currently have the following setup. > consumer1 <-- supplier1 <---multi-master-repl---> supplier2 --> > consumer2 > > What is the correct order in which to restart directory servers so that > all replication agreements will come up OK ? > It should no

Re: [389-users] attribute name case sensitivity

Mike Li wrote: > Looks like the ldap server forces lower case sensitivity (or is that > set as default somewhere). When I add an attribute, it always turn all > letters to lower case. How do I make it case sensitive? What platform? What version of 389-ds-base? What attribute(s)? > > Thanks. > -

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 06/18/2010 02:00 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Monty wig wrote: >> Hi Gurus, >> >> Can someone please point me the right direction on the difference between >> 32bit and 64bit OS? > > For almost all situations, I don't see any benefit to staying with > 32-bit on serve

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Monty wig wrote: > Hi Gurus, > > Can someone please point me the right direction on the difference between > 32bit and 64bit OS? For almost all situations, I don't see any benefit to staying with 32-bit on servers. There's apparently a narrow case for 32-bit on th

problems for installation on a dell e6510

i just receive a dell e6510 today and i m unable to install fedora on it indeed we installed all our machine through cobbler. we boot pxe got the the vmlinuz and initrd file but after the installers says that there s no network card. i boot a rescue CD and the rescue CD told me that the card is a

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On 06/18/2010 06:38 AM, Dj YB wrote: > On Friday June 18 2010 11:22:02 Dj YB wrote: > >> On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> We have been using kstart to launch various programs in order >>> to keep them above other windows: >>> >>> kstart --ontop "progr

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On 06/18/2010 04:22 AM, Dj YB wrote: > On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote: > >> Hello >> We have been using kstart to launch various programs in order >> to keep them above other windows: >> >> kstart --ontop "program" >> >> This has been working fine on RHEL5 using KDE and Ce

Problem routing in Fedora 12 and 13

I have a fedora 13 with two Internet links, but I'm having problems in configuring them. In the past 11 fedora works fine, on Redhat, Centos, only fedora 13 and 12 is not working the same configuration posted below. I dont know what to do, if someone can help me. # File rc.local ip route add 200.

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On Friday June 18 2010 11:22:02 Dj YB wrote: > On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote: > > Hello > > We have been using kstart to launch various programs in order > > to keep them above other windows: > > > > kstart --ontop "program" > > > > This has been working fine on RHEL5 using

Re: FC13 yum presto

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:59 +0300, Dj YB wrote: > hello, > > since installation all updates had to be downloaded almost entirely and not > used the benefit of delta's > is anyone else seeing this problem or is something temporary in the repos? > how could I investigate the source of the problem i

FC13 yum presto

hello, since installation all updates had to be downloaded almost entirely and not used the benefit of delta's is anyone else seeing this problem or is something temporary in the repos? how could I investigate the source of the problem if it lies at my configurations? thanks, YB. -- users mail

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

On 18/06/10 09:26, Steve Searle wrote: > Around 02:41am on Friday, June 18, 2010 (UK time), Sam Varshavchik scrawled: > >> From a user perspective, the major difference is that there is no >> practical Flash plugin for 64 bit. If you need to watch Youboob, >> you'll have to stick to i386. At least

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

Around 02:41am on Friday, June 18, 2010 (UK time), Sam Varshavchik scrawled: > From a user perspective, the major difference is that there is no > practical Flash plugin for 64 bit. If you need to watch Youboob, > you'll have to stick to i386. At least until Youboob migrates to HTML > 5. However,

Re: kstart on fedora 13

On Friday June 18 2010 00:32:44 Roger K. Wells wrote: > Hello > We have been using kstart to launch various programs in order > to keep them above other windows: > > kstart --ontop "program" > > This has been working fine on RHEL5 using KDE and CentOS 5.5 > using Gnome. > > Now on FC13 (Gnome) w

Re: 32bit Vs 64bit OS

2010/6/18 Sam Varshavchik : > Minor differences are that 64 bit applications are slightly faster, and 64 > bit lets you use more RAM. Not always it's faster, everything depend of application one will be faster one will be slower. -- Łukasz Jagiełło lukaszjagielloorg -- users mailing list users@