ne 20, 2010 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
This scheme is known as relaying between Kannel and it is handled by
kannel_*_sms() in the smsc_http.c where by default or we can redefine it by
ourself. Using this scheme there will be too many inside hops. And I'm not
for you (that won't
go into svn trunk) that does the trick.
== Rene
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 20 juni 2010 4:08
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
This scheme is known as relaying bet
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> There is another way to do this using the sendsms interface.
>
> smsbox1->bearerbox1->HTTP smsc->smsbox2->bearerbox2
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: sangprabv
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: users@kannel.org
>
ag 19 juni 2010 20:25
To: sangprabv; Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
There is another way to do this using the sendsms interface.
smsbox1->bearerbox1->HTTP smsc->smsbox2->bearerbox2
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: sa
m: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
So the configuration would be like this:
ESME_A<->SMPPBOX_A<->BEARERBOX<->SMPPBOX_B<
]
> Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
> To: Alejandro Guerrieri
> Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
>
> So the configuration would be like this:
> ESME_A<->SMPPBOX_A<->BEARERBOX<->SMPPBOX_B<->ESME_
Yes, that is the idea.
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 19:12
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
So the configuration would be like this:
ESME_A<->SMPPBOX_A<-&
d messages can be passed in between the
> > client.
> >
> > Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
> >
> > == Rene
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: zaterdag
t; Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
>
> == Rene
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: For the ones u
e bearerbox reroute-smsc-id messages can be passed in between the
> > client.
> >
> > Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
> >
> > == Rene
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: sangprabv [mailto:s
ges can be passed in between the
> client.
>
> Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
>
> == Rene
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: u
the
client.
Probably this setup is not what you wanted. But it is a possibility.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: sangprabv [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 13:55
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What abou
Nope. It is used only by MOs in the case that multiple smsboxes are
connected, where to route them.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Rene Kluwen"
To: "'Nikos Balkanas'" ; "'sangprabv'"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:14
2010 14:15
> To: sangprabv
> Cc: users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
>
> Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
>
> ESME -> SMPPBOX ->Bearerbox->SMSC
>
> The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox
juni 2010 14:15
To: sangprabv
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
ESME -> SMPPBOX ->Bearerbox->SMSC
The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ES
is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
> which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message - From: "sangprabv"
> To: "Rene Kluwen"
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM
> S
To: "Rene Kluwen"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
<->SMPPBOX<->SMPP_CLIENT
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
<->SMPPBOX<->SMPP_CLIENT_B.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk t
Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that allows for long
(catenated) messages to be delivered via the same smsc, in case of load
balancing.
This version obsoletes that patch that is available for download on the
chimit server.
For the latest (stand-alone) version, use svn co
https://
19 matches
Mail list logo
