Nope. It is used only by MOs in the case that multiple smsboxes are
connected, where to route them.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
To: "'Nikos Balkanas'" <nbalka...@gmail.com>; "'sangprabv'"
<sangpr...@gmail.com>
Cc: <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
I am thinking of a possibility. Does the group = smsbox-route also route
incoming message from a box? Or just incoming messages from the smsc-link?
== Rene
-----Original Message-----
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 14:15
To: sangprabv
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
ESME -> SMPPBOX ->Bearerbox->SMSC
The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "sangprabv" <sangpr...@gmail.com>
To: "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
Cc: <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
<->SMPPBOX<->SMPP_CLIENT_B.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that allows for long
(catenated) messages to be delivered via the same smsc, in case of load
balancing.
This version obsoletes that patch that is available for download on the
chimit server.
For the latest (stand-alone) version, use svn co
https://svn.kannel.org/smppbox/trunk
== Rene Kluwen
