Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME):
ESME -> SMPPBOX ->Bearerbox->SMSC
The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *),
which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "sangprabv" <sangpr...@gmail.com>
To: "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>
Cc: <users@kannel.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox...
What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it
possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A
<->SMPPBOX<->SMPP_CLIENT_B.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that allows for long
(catenated) messages to be delivered via the same smsc, in case of load
balancing.
This version obsoletes that patch that is available for download on the
chimit server.
For the latest (stand-alone) version, use svn co
https://svn.kannel.org/smppbox/trunk
== Rene Kluwen
