I am thinking of a possibility. Does the group = smsbox-route also route incoming message from a box? Or just incoming messages from the smsc-link?
== Rene -----Original Message----- From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas Sent: zaterdag 19 juni 2010 14:15 To: sangprabv Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox... Nope. The way it works is (SMPP_CLIENT = ESME): ESME -> SMPPBOX ->Bearerbox->SMSC The connection from ESME is SMPP. The connection to Bearerbox is (Msg *), which is a kannel protocol. ESME can be any SMPP client. BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: "sangprabv" <sangpr...@gmail.com> To: "Rene Kluwen" <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> Cc: <users@kannel.org> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:55 PM Subject: Re: For the ones using (open) smppbox... What about a pass-thru(forward) configuration between connections? Is it possible, let's say we want to pass traffics SMPP_CLIENT_A <->SMPPBOX<->SMPP_CLIENT_B. sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote: > Today, I committted a patch to smppbox svn trunk that allows for long > (catenated) messages to be delivered via the same smsc, in case of load > balancing. > > This version obsoletes that patch that is available for download on the > chimit server. > > For the latest (stand-alone) version, use svn co > https://svn.kannel.org/smppbox/trunk > > == Rene Kluwen > > >
