>
> -is KahaPersistenceAdapter as reliable as KahaDB?
> -does it guarantee persistence of queues? I do not need Topic durable
> subscriptions, only guaranteed delivery for queues
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Differen
ic durable
subscriptions, only guaranteed delivery for queues
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3037599.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
o reading the pre-release of
> ActiveMQ in Action was helpful. Just a final question: is
> kahaPersistenceAdapter safe for persistent queues? can it be used in a
> master-slave setup?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between
.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3037363.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3013325.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
http://fusesource.com
.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3013325.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of the two
> approaches?
>
> Thanks in advance for your time and answers,
> Carlo
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3010514.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Use
terms of performance and reliability of the two
approaches?
Thanks in advance for your time and answers,
Carlo
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3010514.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
