I have seen various configurations in both the ActiveMQ website and mailing list posts, alternatively using the <kahaPersistenceAdapter> and <kahaDB> elements in the xml configuration.
Are the two syntaxes equivalent, or do they select different implementations/configurations? in case what are the advantages/disadvantages in terms of performance and reliability of the two approaches? Thanks in advance for your time and answers, Carlo -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3010514.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.