Thanks Gary... You suggest using KahaDB over KahaPersistenceAdapter because of more development activity and support. However, I have significant performance issues with KahaDB. From my tests, KahaBD performance is heavily dependent on the maximum sync rate of the filesystem. KahaPersistenceAdapter is generally faster as described. My questions are: -enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" speeds up KahaDB a lot, but, does it guarantee persistence of messages in all cases?
-is KahaPersistenceAdapter as reliable as KahaDB? -does it guarantee persistence of queues? I do not need Topic durable subscriptions, only guaranteed delivery for queues -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3037599.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
