KahaDB is a new implementation, the latest incarnation. KahaDB uses less file file descriptors and provides faster recovery than its predecessor, the AMQ message store.
On 25 October 2010 16:45, carlo.bonamico <carlo.bonam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have seen various configurations in both the ActiveMQ website and mailing > list posts, alternatively using the <kahaPersistenceAdapter> and <kahaDB> > elements in the xml configuration. > > Are the two syntaxes equivalent, or do they select different > implementations/configurations? in case what are the > advantages/disadvantages in terms of performance and reliability of the two > approaches? > > Thanks in advance for your time and answers, > Carlo > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Difference-between-kahaPersistenceAdapter-and-kahaDB-tp3010514p3010514.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com
