t; > time allows.
> > It would be nice to see more time and effort being put into console,
> > especially in these early stages. It's the frontend that the "normal"
> user
> > sees first, and gets the first impressions from.
> >
> >
> >
> > [i
block.
>
> --
> Vilius
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Taylor
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 12:09 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 2.40.0 HAWTIO console design
>
> I have created some Jiras to cover the feedback, see [1] for the cu
es Javax whereas the new console is Jakarta so using the old console is
not possible at least embedded. One possibility is to deploy the old
console in a web server and use the connect button to connect to broker
instances.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 10:09, Andy Taylor wrote:
> I have created so
ight, but in order to close that docked
> window you have to click X symbol. It would be great if clicking the same
> attribute the second time the window would be closed.
>
> Hopefully that's a fair feedback from me.
>
> --
>Best Regards,
> Vilius
>
> -
+ 1 to all that Justin said. Just to add a little more, Jolokia polls all
the JMX beans regularly and this does not currently scale, once you hit a
certain number of addresses the console just hangs, most of this is just
for the JMX tree and isnt needed for the non JMX view. I am currently
working
at was
> causing the problem. This sorting was removed in later versions. Could
> you make an option/setting to bring it back? Or perhaps there is a flag
> for it, I just haven't found it yet.
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:03 AM Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Ap
The
> original UI didn't have it, as it was always visible in the tree.
> * And the padding in general. I know it's nice to look at, but as soon as
> there's more information on the screen, it's at the expense of usability.
> It's not a mobile app.
>
> Jan
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 09:44, Jan Šmucr wrote:
> Hello.
> I know I may get some hate for this, but still, I'd like to ask: Is the
> new console about to get some usability upgrades?
>
Upgrades as in?
> We're running 2.35.0 atm, and soon I'll be asked to upgrade to a newer
> version. But admitte
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.1.0
*Downloads
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/
*Complete list of updates
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/release-notes-1.1.0
I would like to highlight these impro
rs@activemq.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: new Artemis Console question
>
> Classification: Public
>
> Andy,
>
> Thx for the answers!
> I was first using "localhost", then "127.0.0.1" after I found the IPv6
> warning in the documentation.
> I wil
different hostname or localhost isnt mapped
correctly?
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 10:06, Andy Taylor wrote:
> I haven't seen that before, can you supply your connection config for
> jolokia. Also what version of Artemis are you using?
>
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 at 21:27, Dondor
I haven't seen that before, can you supply your connection config for
jolokia. Also what version of Artemis are you using?
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 at 21:27, Dondorp, Erwin
wrote:
> Classification: Public
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying the new Artemis Console.
> Installing it with jetty-home-12.0.14 and a
documentation see:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/
Many thanks to all who contributed to the new console.
Andy Taylor
13 matches
Mail list logo