Re: [uml-user] Problem running UML on my amd64 SKAS4 patched

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 2.6.18 does not have skas4, you need 2.6.24 + skas4 patch for the guest. Antoine Flavio wrote: > Hello! > > I've just upgraded my kernel up to the 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 release, > patching it with the skas4 patch successfully. > Once I try to run UML,

Re: [uml-user] ubd0 versus ubda??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 IIRC ubd0=ubda ubd1=ubdb and so on... Antoine Robert P. J. Day wrote: | the first of what will undoubtedly be numerous newbie-level | questions about UML, since i've been perusing the wealth of online | docs for UML and, with few exceptions, all

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The kernels and filesystems here: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ Should all be set to use dhcp network configuration, just start a dhcp server and you should be up and running. Antoine Robert P. J. Day wrote: | as the next step in my UML recipe for fe

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Robert P. J. Day wrote: | On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Antoine Martin wrote: | |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- |> Hash: SHA512 |> |> The kernels and filesystems here: |> http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ |> Should all be set to use dhcp net

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Robert P. J. Day wrote: | On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Antoine Martin wrote: | |> Well, the problem is that if you don't want to use dhcp, you either have |> to edit some config files on the guest or you have to login and bring |> the netw

Re: [uml-user] Changing network device names

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Will Morton wrote: | Greetings UMLers; | | I am booting a custom 2.6.24.4 UML kernel, running a debian etch guest | created using debootstrap. I am booting using the kernel command | line: | | root=/dev/ubda ubd0=./etch.rootfs ubd1=./etch.swapfs mem

Re: [uml-user] Fwd: yum: not found

http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html fang zheng wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: *fang zheng* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: 2008-4-17 21:21 > Subject: Re: [uml-user] yum: not found > To: Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

Brendan, You're not explaining what doesn't work Have you tried pinging, traceroute, tcpdump, etc.. Cheers Antoine Brendan McNally wrote: > Hi All > > I am having major problems getting my UML sessions networked > correctly. Can someone please review my configuration or suggest a > so

Re: [uml-user] cant boot 2.6.25

have you tried adding root=/dev/ubda ? using ubda/b/c instead of ubd0/1/2? And for the parse_chan_pair warnings, you may also want: con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=null Antoine Jon Rafkind wrote: > I just tried UML with the new 2.6.25 kernel but it would not boot up > properly. I was using the same rootfs

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

ping the host machine. If you can, but >> can't ping the world, check if your IP Masquerading is on. E.g. >> >> iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE >> >> Jay >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brendan McNally wrote: | Don't know why I'm doing it the hard way! | | Thanks for your help though, I'm sorted now. Would you care to share what you did wrong? It might help some other users in the future. Antoine | | Brendan | | Jeff Dike wrote:

Re: [uml-user] Nagafix UML Web site now closed?

Ooops, bit busy with other stuff at the moment... Will take care of it later. Sorry about the inconvenience, paying customers first... Cheers Antoine Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access / on this server. > Apache Server at

[uml-user] [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

FWD: I've had no reply so I've pulled the images. --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Jeff, I will be removing the FC5 disk image which is linked from the home page. It is taking a fair chunk out of my bandwidth allowance and I never got as much as a credit or

Re: [uml-user] [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

Hi, I had to take the site down as I moved some servers around. It will be restored when I get a chance. root wrote: > I also have noticed that http://uml.nagafix.co.uk only shows > "It works!". > You can find a debian etch rootfs and a "cloonix" customized rootfs at > http://clownix.net, if it

Re: [uml-user] http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/

No, this is just another vhost, since uml.nagafix.co.uk has been moved, apache uses the first vhost as default. It will be back when I get a chance to look at it. Jerrad Pierce wrote: > UML images. Has someone mistakenly changed your DNS configuration? > The link given on your website (and many o

[uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ If you are going to download a few images, please, please consider using the torrent and seeding: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linu

[uml-user] root_fs images

Hi all, I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ If you are going to download a few images, please, please consider using the torrent and seeding: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent (as I do pay

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Dave, David Houlden wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 Antoine Martin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ >> > Antoi

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 John Reiser wrote: >> please consider using the torrent and seeding: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent > > Attempts to seed from two clients with significantly different network paths > have failed t

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi John, John Reiser wrote: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent > >>> Attempts to seed from two clients with significantly different network >>> paths have failed to transfer any data for the last 22

Re: [uml-user] How to create UML file system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Leonid Chaichenets wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 07:38:17PM +0200, Flavio wrote: >> This is very easy in case you want to install debian based >> distributions, such as ubuntu, but I am wondering about doing the >> same for other distr

Re: [uml-user] Building a Arch Linux root image

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Amit Saha wrote: > Hi! > > I am following this link at > http://uml.jfdi.org/uml/Wiki.jsp?page=BuildingRootFileSystems for > building a UML root image to boot from. I want to build a Arch Linux UML > image. Which tool or technique should I follow

[uml-user] 2.6.31.2 broke UML build (2.6.31 was fine)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 64-bit host: tar -jxf linux-2.6.31.2.tar.bz2 cd linux-2.6.31.2 cp ../.config ./ make ARCH=um [...] MODPOST vmlinux.o GEN .version CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/bui

[uml-user] FYI: [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

For those of you wondering why there is a broken link on the UML home page. I pulled the link a few months after sending this email. --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Jeff, I will be removing the FC5 disk image which is linked from the home page. It is takin

Re: [uml-user] 2.6.31.2 broke UML build (2.6.31 was fine)

Confirmed with gcc 4.1.2 and 4.3.2 Use this config if yours does not exhibit the problem: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/kernels/kernel64-2.6.31.config Shall I forward this to LKML? Antoine Martin wrote: > 64-bit host: > > tar -jxf linux-2.6.31.2.tar.bz2 > cd linux-2.6.31.2 >

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

Anselm Lingnau wrote: > Rodrigo Baroni wrote: > >> Does anybody knows if is doable to run X in uml (not Xnest or similars) ? > > The problem with this idea is that a »real« X server expects to talk to > graphics hardware of some description. VMware & co. solve this problem by > actually emula

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

dy knows if is doable to run X in uml (not Xnest or similars) ? Antoine > Le lundi 28 décembre 2009 à 14:47 +0700, Antoine Martin a écrit : >> Anselm Lingnau wrote: >>> Rodrigo Baroni wrote: >>> >>>> Does anybody knows if is doable to run X in uml (not X

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

. What is the difficulty you are encountering? Antoine > Vincent > > > > > > Le lundi 28 décembre 2009 à 23:43 +0700, Antoine Martin a écrit : >> clownix wrote: >>> I do not understand the need here, any application such as wireshark, >>> firefox .

Re: [uml-user] hang after Starting crond: [ OK ]

On 12/09/2010 04:55 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, hxqq wrote: > >>Hi everyone, >>*** My OS is Fedora 11, I download Linux kernel 2.6.36.1 and use >> > >>Initialized stdio console driver >>Console initialized on /dev/tty0 >>console [tty0] enabled >>Ini

Re: [uml-user] hang after Starting crond: [ OK ]

On 12/10/2010 08:43 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: > On 12/09/2010 04:55 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, hxqq wrote: >> >>>Hi everyone, >>>*** My OS is Fedora 11, I download Linux kernel 2.6.36.1 and use >>> >> >&g

Re: [uml-user] Unable to install UML

Hi Sarthak, You're not saying which kernel you are using or which filesystem... which makes it hard for people to help you. My guess is that you're trying to mount an ext3/ext4 filesystem on an older kernel that does not support its features. Cheers Antoine On 14/02/11 05:09, sarthak dash wr

Re: [uml-user] Unable to install UML

root > filesystem(ext4 types) as rootfs for uml. > > Please help me in my efforts and since this is my first post to any > forums/threads please excuse me for any lack of details provided. > > Regards, > Sarthak Dash > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Antoine M

Re: [uml-user] Running 32bit binaries in a 64bit uml kernel

On 03/09/2011 04:32 PM, clow...@clownix.net wrote: > I do the following: > > make mrproper ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > cp ${KCONFIG} .config > # make menuconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > make modules_install ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$HERE > > To make runnin

Re: [uml-user] Running 32bit binaries in a 64bit uml kernel

On 03/08/2011 03:33 PM, Eric Dacquay wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing around with uml these past few days and I was > wondering if it was possible to run a 32 bit binary under a 64bit uml > kernel. I've got no issues running 64bit binaries but I've had no > such luck with the 32bit binaries. If

Re: [uml-user] 32 bit UML kernel over Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit

You would have to give more details than "cannot boot". Clearly, it's something in your environment, so look for differences. Antoine On 03/09/2011 05:08 PM, Augusto wrote: > I've noticed that my 32-bit UML kernel cannot boot on Ubuntu-64, while it > works > correctly on the corresponding Ubun

Re: [uml-user] Help Password Debian Squeeze

Hi, Looks like you downloaded from (right?): http://fs.devloop.org.uk/ I think I rebuilt the squeeze images recently and I forgot to clear the root password (now fixed). As I have been asked this question before, I will try to make it quite clear: there is no password set (so don't ask me what it

Re: [uml-user] uml issue - Read-only file system

On 05/06/2011 06:59 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Lakshmipathi.G > wrote: >>> Is this really a UML issue? >>> Tell the kernel to mount the rootfs rw... >>> >> When booted it for the first with same command ,its worked fine. After >> doing init 0 and startin

Re: [uml-user] uml issue - Read-only file system

On 05/06/2011 07:51 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Lakshmipathi.G > wrote: >> I'm not sure as I didn't create them ,manually.But Its not working after >> initial shutdown. > > I guess the root fs was damaged. > >> Are you using ext4 to read ext2/3? >> Yes,i

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

On 06/08/2011 10:18 PM, Edmundo Carmona wrote: > Just curious. Are you running UML on Natty? I had some issues with UML > on natty because of the gcc version. Are you using gcc 4.5? If you > are, can you try compiling the UML kernel with 4.4 and try again? It > can be easily done specifying the pat

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

>> Okay, I made a fresh attempt. Here's wat I did: >> ./linux-2.6.22-rc2 ubda=Slackware-12.2-root_fs > (snip) > > Apologies for posting the whole thing. Is it fine? It's absolutely fine. > One more thing. This was what I got the second time. the first time I had > some errors saying "device out

[uml-user] building -longterm releases [was Help with installing UML]

On 06/09/2011 12:25 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> It seems this version (2.6.35.x) is broken, I'll try to rebuild it, in >> the meantime the other versions seem to work ok for me. > > I guess the kernel

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

> naman-mint@naman-mint-laptop ~/uml/linux-2.6.23.13 $ First, use something more recent. FYI: I've just checked the instructions I posted here: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html And all the kernels on there now run ok. So, you should be able to get UML running in 5 easy steps. Cheers Antoine

Re: [uml-user] Running UML on a x86_64

On 06/11/2011 01:33 AM, lanas wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know if the only way to run a 32-bit UML on a x86_64 > is to compile the UML kernel (ARCH=um) on a 32 bit machine (virtual > machine for instance) and then use that kernel on the x86_64 machine to > run UML with a 32-bit UML file

Re: [uml-user] user mode linux and pts/tty issues?

Hi, There is a an issue with recent Ubuntu filesystems when used with UML, they don't seem to start a console. I've tried removing plymouth, adding tty0 entries, etc (anyone with a suggestion on how to fix this would be most welcome) Try another filesystem and it should be fine. Cheers Antoine

Re: [uml-user] Running a 32 bit Filesystem on a 64 bit kernel

On 15/08/11 04:04, Aniruddha Laud wrote: > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1002.2/01983.html > > I see this thread discussing a similar issue where the main question is > unanswered. Is it just a case of the Kconfig option not being there? No, minimal support for 32-bit on 64-bit ker

Re: [uml-user] modules are appended with "gdea2244-dirty" so unable to insmod custom modules

On 09/17/2011 04:35 PM, Lakshmipathi.G wrote: > Hi - > I'm having kernel version 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 and download version > 2.6.32 created a uml kernel but it modules are named as > "2.6.32-gdea2244-dirty". Thus I can't insert custom modules created from > 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 kernel. >

Re: [uml-user] modules are appended with "gdea2244-dirty" so unable to insmod custom modules

On 09/17/2011 05:42 PM, Lakshmipathi.G wrote: > When it comes to loading modules, UML is no different from a regular >> kernel. You seem to be a bit confused by kernel module versioning and >> module loading in general, I think you should start there. >> > > Thanks I'll read more about them. > >

Re: [uml-user] build a own image

On 11/30/2011 08:25 PM, mattias wrote: > how to do it? > without bebootstrap I assume you mean debootstrap? And why would you want to avoid it? You aren't saying which distro or version you are trying to create which makes it difficult to give you any advice. For Fedora and Debian/Ubuntu distros y

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

On 11/30/2011 02:54 AM, ning ji wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I'm new to UML, having issues bring up DHCP for my uml. > step 1:./kernel2.6.39 ubda=./debian50.rfs mem=128M > eth0=tuntap,,,10.50.183.254 Have you tried using a specific tap device here? Like: (...) eth0=tuntap,tap1,fe:f0:00:00:00:01,1

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

(snip) >>> Having been struggling this for 1 week, any help appreciated ! >> Have you tried following these instructions: >> http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html > Question here, if uml is running in my desktop, i need to install and run > dhcpd in my desktop ? If you are following the howto yes.

Re: [uml-user] the filesystem (fedoracore5) is OK for Ubuntu 1004 (2.6.32)?

On 01/16/2012 03:47 PM, Yiming wrote: > Hi, all > > I am trying to using uml on Ubuntu 1004 (2.6.32). I was wondering > whether I can use the filesystem (fedoracore5) on official website as > the rot fs for my uml. Thank you! I assume you followed the link from the completely out-of-date uml sourc

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Nick Cripps wrote: >> I saw this thread: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAFLxGvz2wdfRtryzJ1t0G11rxzOmhdNEVi6A%3DXS5uLG0PA7VAQ%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=user-mode-linux-user >> w

Re: [uml-user] UML root image sharing

On 02/14/2012 07:25 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello List, > > Is there a particular format of the root image that UML uses? See block devices here: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/configure.html As for partition tables and filesystem types, UML is a Linux kernel so it will support wha

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Nick Cripps wrote: >>>> I saw this thread: >>&

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 02/16/2012 04:42 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin >>> wrote: >>>> On 01/19/2012

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 02/16/2012 03:47 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: > On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin >> wrote: >>> On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23

Re: [uml-user] SMP on UML

On 08/24/2012 11:19 PM, Dragos Diaconescu wrote: > Hello, > > I try to compile the UML, from a linux kernel(make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386) > and I have configured it to use SMP (make config). I am getting the > following error: > >CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h >CC arch/um/kernel/a

Re: [uml-user] cannot log in UML

On 01/31/2013 06:59 AM, Han wrote: > Hi, > > just to follow up as I still face this issue. I was wondering if > there is any way I can debug this issue? Basically, there is no any > errors printed. The login prompt just comes back without going to ask > "password". I tried the "uml" account

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

On 01/31/2013 07:53 AM, Tony Su wrote: > Hello, > > Actually, 4 questions... > > 1. I noticed the standard procedure for preparing and launching > including applying chroot 755 to the backing file. Is this really > necessary? I should think that any file system that is installed into > a file sho

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

ng. The only FS I found which misbehaves and isn't documented on the website is Fedora 17, where the login shell does not show up as expected. No word on your "research" of systemd vs others host setup then? Cheers Antoine > > Thx, > > Tony > > On Fri, Feb 1, 201

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

On 02/03/2013 03:53 AM, Tony Su wrote: > Thx, > Sorry about not copying the List, needing to keep track which Lists > adhere strictly to RFC which require "Reply To" cannot be configured to > point to the List, only the OP. > > The two kernels I've been using initially are direct links from the UM

Re: [uml-user] kmalloc returns NULL during module init

On 03/21/2013 05:53 AM, Han wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I hit other issues after moving to a recent kernel UML (i.e. cannot > fully bring up the UML). Now I am back and trying to debug UML > itself. However, when I started GDB with UML, I would hit a crash > like the following. > > I was wonderin

[uml-user] UML build broken since 3.0.75 (also affects 3.2.x)

ake[1]: *** [mm/memory.o] Error 1 make: *** [mm] Error 2 This fix is just a copy of what is found in later kernels. Compiled and boot tested both 3.0.80 and 3.2.45, x86_64 and i386. Signed-off-by: Antoine Martin --- a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h 2013-05-25 09:20:51.42000 + +++ b/ar

Re: [uml-user] Patch skas3 - Kernel 2.6.32

On 23/07/13 00:27, Michael Richardson wrote: > 1) I don't thikn that skas3 every got ported to 2.6.32. You can find links to more up to date skas3 patches here: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/links.html > 2) Why do you want it? skas0 usually does better. Usually. Antoine > > -- > ] Never

Re: [uml-user] 64-bit UML with 32-bit root

On 27/08/15 20:14, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > The (unofficial?) FAQ at http://uml.devloop.org.uk/faq.html implies that > it is possible to build UML on a 64-bit system to run a 32-bit guest. You can build a 32-bit *kernel* from a 64-bit host. > The best that I can manage on e.g. Debian "Jessie" x8

Re: [uml-user] UML console not coming

On 01/09/15 11:07, Vijay Tandeker wrote: > Dear Sir, > - Downloaded "linux-3.18.20.tar.xz" from kernel.org > - compiled it for UML using "ARCH=um". > - Downloaded "Ubuntu-TrustyTahr-i386-root_fs" and > "Fedora21-x86-root_fs". > - Still same issue with Ubuntu as

[uml-user] x86_64 status and issues

Hi, I've noticed that quite a few of the patches that have gone into Linus' tree lately seem related to the x86_64 arch. Are we going to have working 64bit guest kernels in 2.6.10? (I am not even asking about skas3 for this arch, although it would be a very welcome development!) Also, whilst we a

[uml-user] x86_64 status and issues

Hi, I've noticed that quite a few of the patches that have gone into Linus' tree lately seem related to the x86_64 arch. Are we going to have working 64bit guest kernels in 2.6.10? (I am not even asking about skas3 for this arch, although it would be a very welcome development!) Also, whilst we a

[uml-user] Re: NPTL question

> Hey gang, I may have missed the response earlier, you have http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-user&w=2&r=1&s=NPTL&q=b > but is UML > incompatible with NPTL on a Host, Guest or both OS? the guest cannot use NPTL. The host can have NPTL installed, and AFAIK later (not yet released?)

[uml-user] re: peculiar intermittent network seizures with uml-2.4.27-1 on 2.4.28

> Notably, the UML ceases responding to network packets for up to a minute > and a half at a time, then restarts again just as quietly: the > console-on-network-port freezes at the same time. The UML continues > running and packets get queued on either side of the... blockage, and > are allowed thr

Re: [uml-user] re: peculiar intermittent network seizures with uml-2.4.27-1 on 2.4.28

Yep, I realised after I sent it, my packets were dropped when I had something I thought was similar. Sorry for the noise. On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 01:01 +, Nix wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Antoine Martin spake: > > Looks to me like this is a routing problem, check your arp tables and

[uml-user] Re: Networking problem.

> Hi all, > i have problem related to networking. > > CASE 1: > My host machine has 2 ethernet cards. Just a guess, but does it work if you disable the other network card? If the 2 cards are connected to the same subnet/gateway, it is impossible to make it work without source routing. AFAIK. The

[uml-user] 2.4.29 is out uml-2.4.27-bs1 applies cleanly

Hi all, Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's patches for 2.4 apply cleanly to 2.4.29, but compilation fails shortly on my dev box (looks like some missing headers). What do i need to do? Cheers Antoine --- This SF.Net email is sp

[uml-user] fix-kill patch still needed for 2.6.10 guest on 2.6.10 host / amd64 ?

Hi all, I was having some very unusual problems with 2.6.9-bs5 and -bb4 running on an AMD 64 2.6.10-as1 host (2.6.10 + minimal security fixes): some processes would not start with the correct SELinux context (sshd would run in kernel_t instead of sshd_t for no apparent reason) but 2.6.10 vanilla a

[uml-user] Re: 2.4.29 is out uml-2.4.27-bs1 applies cleanly

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:33 +, Antoine Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's patches for 2.4 apply > cleanly to 2.4.29, but compilation fails shortly on my dev box (looks > like some missing headers). What do i need to do? &

Re: [uml-user] fix-kill patch still needed for 2.6.10 guest on 2.6.10 host / amd64 ?

On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 00:18 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2005 21:33, Antoine Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was having some very unusual problems with 2.6.9-bs5 and -bb4 running > > on an AMD 64 2.6.10-as1 host (2.6.10 + minimal security f

Re: [uml-user] Re: 2.4.29 is out uml-2.4.27-bs1 applies cleanly

On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 00:02 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2005 21:37, Antoine Martin wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:33 +, Antoine Martin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's

[uml-user] Re: UML guest + SSH

> debug1: Authentications that can continue: > publickey,password,keyboard-interactive > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > debug1: Trying private key: /home/franck/.ssh/identity > debug1: Trying private key: /home/franck/.ssh/id_rsa > debug1: Trying private key: /home/franck/.ssh/id_

[uml-user] Re: Telnet on UML

Please turn off html posting. > Also what does this parameter is used for : > con0=fd:0,fd:1 It is explained on the main uml site, fd means file descriptor. fd:0 is stdin, and fd:1 is stdout Antoine --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Inte

[uml-user] hppfs

Is hppfs support going to be restored? (if not, then the website should probably be updated) I can't remember when it was marked as broken, but it is very useful for honeypots. Thanks Antoine --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide

Re: [uml-user] A hardware random number generator for UML

Excellent, thanks Jeff! Am I right in thinking that similar code could be used to forward any character device? Unrelated question, is skas0 going to work on x86_64 as host or/and as guest: I mean will I be able to run a x86 kernel on x86_64 with skas? - there seems to be a few patches that mentio

[uml-user] Re: [gentoo-amd64] User Mode Linux

> Do I need a full 32-bit chroot to compile a 32-bit guest? Or can I just > pass a SUBARCH=x86 (or something like that) to compile it? SUBARCH does not work (at least not for me) I have cross posted to uml-user ML, in case anyone has a better way of compiling x86 guests on a x86-64 host. Antoine

[uml-user] UML/x86_64

> From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I revived UML/x86_64 by fixing the bugs that had me stymied the last time I > looked at it. It's not in mainline yet, but you can get a working UML by > taking stock 2.6.12-rc3, and adding the incrementals up to and including > skas0 (see http://user-mode-l

[uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

> The 64-bit guest boots into existing 32-bit root_fs without problems, I > will rebuild all my 64-bit guests and let you know how this goes. Actually, I got mixed up, the 64-bit filesystems worked but the 32-bit didn't. I couldn't find any option to allow support for 32-bit binaries, has it been r

[uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice within a short period of time. I captured the messages from a serial console the second time (it seems that you only need to generate some load to trigger this bug - I was compiling some code with gcc): Host: Linux x86_64 2.6.1

Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 17:53 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2005 19:38, Antoine Martin wrote: > > Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice > > within a short period of time. > > > I captured the messages from a s

[uml-user] pcap transport and bridging?

I can't figure out how to use the pcap transport within a working bridged environment: do I need a dedicated interface on the host to attach to or can I reuse an interface already bound to a bridge? I've got 'eth0 up promisc' on the host, attached to a bridge, I want to start a UML instance with pc

[uml-user] Re: 32bit uml guest kernel on 64bit host

> > Also, will there be a performance benefit from running uml 32bit guest on a > > 64bit host (now or planned?) > Difficult question... the host OS will anyway run faster and that will > benefit > a bit UML, but I don't know how much that is. However, for now you have the > big disadvantage tha

Java 1.5, was Re: [uml-user] Increasing perfomance

> > On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > > > At the cost that lots of programs in the guest simply > > > won't work (strace, make, java, ime). Or has there been > > > work fixing this? > > > > What are you talking

Re: Java 1.5, was Re: [uml-user] Increasing perfomance

On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:47 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2005 23:28, Antoine Martin wrote: > > > On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > > > I can run Ja

Re: Java 1.5, was Re: [uml-user] Increasing perfomance

> The only problem is that, while there was some gross code in 2.6.4 patch, > nobody has bothered yet to port it over. And the compatibility layer is very > boring (which also means, difficult to get right, because you need to make > the developers more careful than they'd be inclined to). Tell

Re: Java 1.5, was Re: [uml-user] Increasing perfomance

> > Hmm, what's that? Faster than skas3 I guess?! > > Is this going to work on x86/amd64 guests on amd64 hosts too? > No, SKAS4 would be as fast as SKAS3, but could be merged in mainline... Nice, no more patching! > And amd64 hosts would be fixed as well. > > Also, I've heard some reports of peop

[uml-user] Re: User-mode-linux-user digest, Vol 1 #2090 - 10 msgs

> Quoting Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > And I think that distributing usable root_fs images would be of > great help... > > > > (actually, there are other sources but the site has no link to them > - plus I > > don't like that much cherry-picking root_fs's from people I don't > trust and >

[uml-user] error in modules

> Hi! > I installed a kernel um (2.4.26) from deb packages. In /var/log/syslog > of um > machine I read this error: > "modprobe: modprobe: Can't open > dependencies > file /lib/modules/2.4.26-3um/modules.dep (No such file > or directory)" > Beca

Re: [uml-user] guest with usb on a 2.6.x host

> I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x... > Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on > fedo= > ra weren't helping. I don't know about randomize_va_space, but exec-shield has never caused me any problems running uml in skas3 or skas0 > With exec-shiel

Re: [uml-user] sshd connection closed

> Which brings up another question. When I first booted the uml-guest I > got a modules.dep does not exist error. The recommendation I read for > dealing with this was to touch modules.dep, which certainly did get > rid > of the errors. > > However, is this problem indicative of further problem

[uml-user] Re: One of them annoying what-to-use questions

> The first major decision is whether to run in 32 or 64 bit mode. If raw performance is what you are after, use 32-bit. Sad, but true. > (...) I can't expect SKAS3 to do so. Correct, it doesn't work on 64-bit. > Running in 32-bit mode works almost as well. Chances are SKAS3 would work, > but I'

[uml-user] __crc_kunmap - was Re: (no subject)

Bob Manson wrote: > make ARCH=um > The output of the same is given below. > arch/um/sys-i386/built-in.o: In function `__crc_kunmap': > : multiple definition of `__crc_kunmap' rm .config make ARCH defconfig http://www.mail-archive.com/user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02185.html Antoi

Re: [Fwd: Re: [uml-user] can't compile client >2.6.12]

> Instead, another possibility is the use of SELinux - I say that because > Antoine Martin some time ago has written a SELinux policy and possibly he's > going to share that, on request, after some tidyup (that's possibly needed). I intend to publish my policy files

[uml-user] Re: gentoo udev error

On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 09:09 +0100, diebro wrote: > hi, > i'am using vmlinux-2.6.14-bs2 precompiled kernel but when start your > root filestystem(Gentoo-2005.1-x86-root_fs) i have this error > > > * Configuring system to use udev ... > * Populating /dev with device nodes ... > /sbin/rc: line

  1   2   3   >