On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:41:51PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Then it would be mere coincidence that this started with the instance
> kernel upgrades (I had never encountered it previously). However, it does
> seem like the simplest explanation.
Could be - nothing has changed there UML-wise in
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:35:38PM +0100, Jan Wolff wrote:
>> Could the entropy in /dev/random be exhausted because Anthony drains
>> more
>> entropy than is produced?
>
> That's what I'm thinking. The UML /dev/hw_random is attached to the
> host's /dev/random. If you have rng-utils installed i
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:35:38PM +0100, Jan Wolff wrote:
> Could the entropy in /dev/random be exhausted because Anthony drains more
> entropy than is produced?
That's what I'm thinking. The UML /dev/hw_random is attached to the
host's /dev/random. If you have rng-utils installed in the UML,
Hi Jeff, hi Anthony, hi everybody!
Just a thought...
Could the entropy in /dev/random be exhausted because Anthony drains
more entropy than is produced?
As far as I know, entropy production rate depends on attached hardware
and even might become zero, but I don't know if normal usage of sshd,
Hmmm, I would guess that the random patch is helping a little as I have only
had two recurrences since installing new kernel:
Feb 27 11:35:09 dns2 sshd[1152]: fatal: Couldn't obtain random bytes (error
604389476)
Feb 27 14:29:16 www sshd[3060]: fatal: Couldn't obtain random bytes (error
604389476)
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:45:24PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
>> It has obviously been too long since I developed any software. I worked
>> past this issue with the '-l' flag to patch and it is currently
>> compiling.
>> I will start testing the new kernel shortly.
>
> Don't build it if it didn'
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:45:24PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:12:53PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > So, I'm going to try and manually fit the rejected portions into the code.
>
> It has obviously been too long since I developed any software. I worked
> past this
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:12:53PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> So, I'm going to try and manually fit the rejected portions into the code.
It has obviously been too long since I developed any software. I worked
past this issue with the '-l' flag to patch and it is currently compiling.
I will s
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:12:53PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
>> # bzip2 -dc ../2.6.25-rc2-mm1.bz2 | patch
>> The next patch would create the file o2cb,
>> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
>
> That looks right - I'd double-check that the tree is what you think it
> is. I'm in the habit of
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:12:53PM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> # wget -c
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/2.6.25-rc2-mm1.bz2
> # wget -c
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.25-rc2.tar.bz2
> ...
> # cd linux-
Quoting Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:30:35AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
>> It appears that this patch is designed against 2.6.22. Do you want me to
>> downgrade from 2.6.24.2 to 2.6.22 to try this?
>
> It's against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1.
>
> Jeff
Oka
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:30:35AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> It appears that this patch is designed against 2.6.22. Do you want me to
> downgrade from 2.6.24.2 to 2.6.22 to try this?
It's against 2.6.25-rc2-mm1.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:14:51AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
>> My instance has the follow on the file system:
>>
>> # ls -lA /dev/*rand*
>> crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 8 2008-02-11 11:43 /dev/random
>> crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 9 2008-02-23 10:06 /dev/urandom
>> #
>>
>> Is it possible that recen
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:14:51AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> My instance has the follow on the file system:
>
> # ls -lA /dev/*rand*
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 8 2008-02-11 11:43 /dev/random
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 9 2008-02-23 10:06 /dev/urandom
> #
>
> Is it possible that recent kernel
14 matches
Mail list logo
