Hello!
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the host side of tap device the mac address seems to be random but it
> > seems like in guest side the mac address is derived from first given
> > ip-address and when using dhcp it's always 0.0.0.0 which causes it to be
> > fe:fd:00:00:00:00.
>
Hello!
I found out the problem with my connection. The problem was that I had set up
prerouting rule which rerouted *all* port 80 connections which were not from
host to internal server. So after I modified the rule so that only connections
to specific address was rerouted and all other was lef
Hello!
I have a mind bogling problem with my guest's network connection. I have
several virtual servers which have direct connection to isp through virtual
switch. They get ip from isp and you can ping from them as well as use
tracepath but for some reason tcp connections doesn't seem to work.
"Nic James Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > In the host side of tap device the mac address seems to be random
> > but it seems like in guest side the mac address is derived from
> > first given ip-address and when using dhcp it's always 0.0.0.0 which
> > cause
"Nic James Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I call it with "eth2=tuntap,ext-test". I got the impression that it
> > is enough to do that when I'm using preconfigured interface. At
> > least there is example of that in Virtual Networking Tutorial. And
> > besid
Hello!
"Nic James Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I have a problem with running ISC DHCP3 client in uml guest.
> > Everytime dhcp-client runs the MAC-address is set to
> > FE:FD:00:00:00:00 regardless what I order it to use.
>
>
>
> Are you starting the
I'm sending this again as it seems like my first post dropped.
Hi!
I have a problem with running ISC DHCP3 client in uml guest.
Everytime dhcp-client runs the MAC-address is set to
FE:FD:00:00:00:00 regardless what I order it to use. It wouldn't be
otherwise a problem but as I'm running severa
Hi!
Anthony Brock wrote:
> > I have 4 GB of physical RAM in the Ubuntu box + 3 GB swap. It is
> > running a vanilla 2.6.17.8 kernel (no skas3 patches, because I haven't
> > successfully managed to apply any sets of skas3 patches)
> Here is an interesting problem. Each instance has 48M. You're l
