On 7/6/2015 6:14 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
Is inserting as a back script there way to go? And if so, would I be
better off doing the same in the IDE rather than as a library?
Unless something has changed since I last heard, the only difference
between "start using" and "insert
I've only used the "start using" synonym for "library" but with it you have
to include the word library so maybe library stack "dhLib" will work.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:08 PM Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
>
> > The library stack is a substack of the m
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> The library stack is a substack of the mainstack I assume? If so, make
> sure you haven''t set things so that it breaks out substacks into separate
> stackfiles. (at which point its no longer monolithic) If the library stack
> isn't a substac
The library stack is a substack of the mainstack I assume? If so, make
sure you haven''t set things so that it breaks out substacks into separate
stackfiles. (at which point its no longer monolithic) If the library stack
isn't a substack, you should make it so that it is.(in code, set the
mainsta
I happily managed to get the library stack working for shared routines in
pretty much a matter of minutes.
I've got my routine to prepare for compile copying the library stack to the
project stack.
However, I assumed "library stack libStackName" would work in a standalone,
but it creates errors e
