The library stack is a substack of the mainstack I assume? If so, make sure you haven''t set things so that it breaks out substacks into separate stackfiles. (at which point its no longer monolithic) If the library stack isn't a substack, you should make it so that it is.(in code, set the mainstack of stack "librarystack" to "NameOfTheMainstack")
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Dr. Hawkins <doch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I happily managed to get the library stack working for shared routines in > pretty much a matter of minutes. > > I've got my routine to prepare for compile copying the library stack to the > project stack. > > However, I assumed "library stack libStackName" would work in a standalone, > but it creates errors error 91 and 568 (can't find stack). > > I very much do not want to have a stack hanging around to potentially have > its routine's called, password protected or not; I want a monolithic app. > > Is inserting as a back script there way to go? And if so, would I be > better off doing the same in the IDE rather than as a library? > > -- > Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. > (702) 508-8462 > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
