I happily managed to get the library stack working for shared routines in pretty much a matter of minutes.
I've got my routine to prepare for compile copying the library stack to the project stack. However, I assumed "library stack libStackName" would work in a standalone, but it creates errors error 91 and 568 (can't find stack). I very much do not want to have a stack hanging around to potentially have its routine's called, password protected or not; I want a monolithic app. Is inserting as a back script there way to go? And if so, would I be better off doing the same in the IDE rather than as a library? -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
