On 7/6/2015 6:14 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:

Is inserting as a back script there way to go?  And if so, would I be
better off doing the same in the IDE rather than as a library?


Unless something has changed since I last heard, the only difference between "start using" and "insert <script> into back" is the position in the backscripts layering. A stack in use is inserted before the Home script in the IDE (for HC compatibility,) whereas a backscript comes after the Home script. In a standalone, the first mainstack opened is "home" and I assume the layering will be the same there.

In general, unless you have same-named handlers in the home stack, backscripts and stacks in use are pretty much interchangeable.

I've never had a substack fail to be found so I'm not sure why yours aren't. But try "start using" and see if that makes a difference.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to