On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Sam Hulick wrote:
> I am looking to safeguard against someone taking these sounds and
> selling them to make a profit. I imagine the same is true for
> Ubuntu, no?
The whole ethos of Ubuntu is to build something that is legal to
share, legal to modify, legal to sell, libre (f
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Chris Wilson wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/527267 saying
> application indicators are too wide
The width of the indicator block is the sum of the icons themselves,
plus the padding between them. The padding had been adjusted wider
and narrower seve
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Gregory Merchan wrote:
> #1 is easiest. It's always "exact" from a toolkit point of view.
What matters is grid-fitting (crisp integer alignment). Both Palm OS,
and Apple iOS have succesfully rolled out pixel-doubling; while
keeping the apparent device metrics fixed for older
On Sat, 5 May 2012, Ryan Gauger wrote:
> > A proposal: why don't we join both HUD start actions (Alt(tap) + Alt(press)
> > ) in one.
> I don't like this idea because it just looks cluttered up.
Recently SABDFL posted a suggestion about making the HUD keypress
configurable between Alt, Alt-Gr, and
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Gustav Sony wrote:
> Am 21.03.2012 11:46, schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:
> > please refine the proposal.
> http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/5207/auswahlsoundindicatorde.png
That is an intriguing proposal (to use the volume slider as a
menu-parent for the input/output devices).
Ho
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Since Rhythmbox is in the sound menu and you can access play controls
> from it directly, I expected it to be accessible with HUD as well.
Excellent catch. In this first cut of the HUD, it is only showing
normal menu items/indicators. The Sound->
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, nick rundy wrote:
> Because, they are clicking Shutdown and walking away
This would be worthwhile to analyse and solve for everybody,
not just as a workaround it on one individual installation.
It could be analysed with the reboot use-cases; but, to do that
effectively you ne
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, nick rundy wrote:
> confirmation shutdown dialog should be the "unsupported codepath."
A typical Ubuntu system is suspended perhaps 10 times for every 1
shutdown. The Suspend action is immediate (it has no '…' ellipse).
Now, on a dual-boot system, Shutdown/Reboot will be mor
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Nekhelesh wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 11:57 PM, Paul Sladen wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, nick rundy wrote:
> > If reboot were to be added, which other menu item would you remove?
> Why is there a need to remove a menu item to introduce Reboot option?
This,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, nick rundy wrote:
> I really miss not having the option of rebooting from the panel
If reboot were to be added, which other menu item would you remove?
1. What would be the pros (positives) of this change?
2. What would be the cons (negatives) of this change?
Would the f
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Gustav Sony wrote:
> "Hide to panel" was the thing I wanted to say ... sry! That could
> resolve the "Transmission"-thing ...
Think about the larger context:
"What if there was no panel to hide to?"
Then how would your proposed interaction model work?
-Paul
--
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Or will the launcher wait a certain amount and then kill it,
Waiting, then killing, is generally how forcible-quit systems work.
You send the application a (polite) signal/request, and if it is not
effected during some $timeout you forcibly termi
12 matches
Mail list logo
