I definitely like the lens idea.
In Christ,
Ryan
Sent from my iPod
On May 6, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Omar B. wrote:
> I would like a lens that does that, is browsable and probably also replace
> nautilus :)
>
> the nearest thing I seen is probably in kde.
>
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:18:44 -0600
I would like a lens that does that, is browsable and probably also replace
nautilus :)
the nearest thing I seen is probably in kde.
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:18:44 -0600
From: isan...@gmail.com
To: t...@freenet.de
CC: unity-design@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Unity-design] Replacing Nautilu
Am 05.05.2012 20:59, schrieb cpOno:
Hi all,*
HUD is the future no doubt about that* ... but needs to have
intrinsically the effectiveness of the Application menus navigation,
OR,
at least (for now) to guaranty the reminder/sequence effect of the
"1st order" menu options.
A proposal: why don
Hi Thorsten,
Hi understand. This proposal could be problematic right now.
But don't discard this concept for the future. It could be useful.
For now, I also agree with the superiority of hierarchical menus (HM's).
But I see a huge potential for HUD (or its successor).
That was the basis of the
more than replacing nautilus I would add the right menu function to the
dash, accessible both via mouse and shortcut. This could maker the dash
really powerful adding features as open with, navigation, file properties,
and so on!
Supernova
Il giorno domenica 6 maggio 2012, Jo-Erlend Schinstad <
jo
Den 06. mai 2012 17:58, skrev Ian Santopietro:
>
> Well, it would still be there underneath. But it needn't be exposed to
> the end user. At least not by default. You could always install a
> traditional file browser, but it shouldn't be necessary to use the
> traditional file system.
>
I very muc
Well, it would still be there underneath. But it needn't be exposed to the
end user. At least not by default. You could always install a traditional
file browser, but it shouldn't be necessary to use the traditional file
system.
On May 6, 2012 9:51 AM, "Jo-Erlend Schinstad"
wrote:
> Den 06. mai 2
Den 06. mai 2012 17:18, skrev Ian Santopietro:
>
> In my opinion, what Ubuntu really needs I not to replace Nautilus, but
> to replace the file system it browses. Obviously, it will still be
> there for system purposes, but it should not be exposed to the end
> user by default.
>
Zeitgeist can pre
Obviously it would need development. A "tagfs" would probably need to put
tagged files into folders based on the tags, for compatibility. But I think
this is the best way forward.
On May 6, 2012 9:42 AM, "shane lee" wrote:
> A tag based system would cause problems for someone who no longer wants
A tag based system would cause problems for someone who no longer wants to
use ubuntu or shares files between other operating systems or with other
people.
They would then be left with a disorganised mess.
I had similar problems, albeit on a smaller scale, when I used shotwell a
long time ago.
By
In my opinion, what Ubuntu really needs I not to replace Nautilus, but to
replace the file system it browses. Obviously, it will still be there for
system purposes, but it should not be exposed to the end user by default.
The concept of the file system is just no longer relevant to modern
computin
On 05/05/2012 10:00 PM, cpOno wrote:
Entry. The user will not switch here... HUD behaviour.
In the future the hierarchical will disappear right ?
That doesn't seem to be clear, at the moment.
The hierarchical menu is superior to the HUD for getting an overview of
available commands. It can be
On 05/06/2012 12:32 AM, Gregory Merchan wrote:
While emblems allowed some distinction, a
tweak to the icon color would have allowed distinctions that carried
over into the modes with smaller icons.
Uniform walls of folder icons are indeed not very helpful. An old
concept, going beyond just col
13 matches
Mail list logo
