Well, it would still be there underneath. But it needn't be exposed to the end user. At least not by default. You could always install a traditional file browser, but it shouldn't be necessary to use the traditional file system. On May 6, 2012 9:51 AM, "Jo-Erlend Schinstad" <joerlend.schins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 06. mai 2012 17:18, skrev Ian Santopietro: > > > > In my opinion, what Ubuntu really needs I not to replace Nautilus, but > > to replace the file system it browses. Obviously, it will still be > > there for system purposes, but it should not be exposed to the end > > user by default. > > > > Zeitgeist can pretty much provide this right now. Would need a good GUI, > though. Replacing the filesystem itself, is something else entirely. > Think I can just guarantee that won't happen. > > Jo-Erlend Schinstad > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
