New bug files: Bug #738462
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
Title:
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
** Changed in: nautilus
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
New bug filed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/315552
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
the bug has been fixed, don't reopen it if you have a similar issue but
rather open a new bug
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you a
Hey Bill,
I had a similar issue (see the thread link above your post) and the fix for me
was:
rsync -ta orig_dir/* new_dir/
HTH,
-BassKozz
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
Fresh install of Intrepid, mounted old 8.04 hard drive (ext3) and copied
a huge photo collection to the new drive (i.e., via Nautilus) -- ALL
TIME STAMPS RESET. I still have the old drive (w proper time-stamps)
but I've also done a lot of work on the 'new' photo collection so now
I'm stuck, not su
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Not working for me: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1006997
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
I added the comment to say that nautilus is indeed preserving
timestamps. I've raised a gthumb bug.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
philinux wrote:
> Intrepid clean install. Just transferred files with gthumb and the timestamps
> are not preserved. However copying with nautilus, while painfully slow keeps
> the correct timestamps.
> Canon G5 camera. And it gets mounted correclty.
>
>
Now I see why Sebastian was having such
Intrepid clean install. Just transferred files with gthumb and the timestamps
are not preserved. However copying with nautilus, while painfully slow keeps
the correct timestamps.
Canon G5 camera. And it gets mounted correclty.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
kpoole, please let us take this in bug #247980. I think Sebastien just
means that you should not discuss it in this bug report, since it is
closed.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
> firefox issue?
>
>
It can't be opened as a Nautilus problem. All your previous arguments
were that it must be something other than Nautilus. I'm unfamiliar with
the process of opening a new bug so
(i am using a up-to-date hardy system)
when displaying a site in firefox 3 and dragging a image to the desktop
a link to this page is created automatically without any user
interaction. (doesnt seem to be a good default for images to me, but i
dont really care).
when dragging something other (i t
why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
firefox issue?
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> nautilus can have several issues, why do you insist to want to use this
> code issue which was a libglib bug and has been fixed now? bug #247980
> seems to describe this one so you should rather comment on this one, not
> sure why the firefox maintainer didn't reply but I
nautilus can have several issues, why do you insist to want to use this
code issue which was a libglib bug and has been fixed now? bug #247980
seems to describe this one so you should rather comment on this one, not
sure why the firefox maintainer didn't reply but I expect there is just
too many bu
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the bug you are commenting on was an issue about nautilus standard
> copies, no about photos, not about firefox, and it has been fixed. if
> you have an another issue open a new bug as it has been done for the
> photo copies timestamp issue
>
>
And If I do open one it w
the bug you are commenting on was an issue about nautilus standard
copies, no about photos, not about firefox, and it has been fixed. if
you have an another issue open a new bug as it has been done for the
photo copies timestamp issue
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Your
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Agai
the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
for example, the issue is not new in hardy
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
htt
philinux wrote:
> I've raised a bug for the camera issue. Bug 242647.
>
> But it doesn't seem to have had any attention. I had to buy a card
> reader and use cp.
>
>
Yes, there's a core interest here and any thing outside of that core is
disregarded. I actually found a separate Firefox add-on
I've raised a bug for the camera issue. Bug 242647.
But it doesn't seem to have had any attention. I had to buy a card
reader and use cp.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
because there is already some comments on the bug which state the issue
described there has been fixed in the code and that if you still have
something not working correctly you should open a new bug
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bu
This is a free world.
I'm sorry for breaking the rules of the establishment.
But how come I should know that it "seems" to be a different case. It
may be or it may be not.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you
the ntfs case seems to be a different one and you should not comment on
a closed bug about it
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Sorry, meant
Yes, Tormod, thank you... but if the destination of a copy operation is
NTFS, the date is lost. Both last modified date and last accessed date
are set to the current date.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification
Yes, permalink, thank you... but if the destination of a copy operation
is NTFS, the date is lost. Both last modified date and last accessed
date are set to the current date.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because yo
Crossland, this bug was fixed in Ubuntu 8.04 with libglib2.0-0
2.16.3-1ubuntu3 in hardy-updates on 2008-06-25.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
Ubunto 8.04 with last update still has nautilus 2.22.3
How can I get nautilus 2.23.4 with the bug fixed?
This is a nasty bug!
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
It's an easy thing to say when the person you're saying it to can't
refute it. The combination of behavior changes is an odd coincidence,
though. It speaks of multiple points of failure which is less likely
than a single point of failure. (I know, you don't think anything has
failed but we who h
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:33 PM, kpoole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My comment wasn't just about the camera issue. I'be found the same
> change in behavior when copying a file from Firefox to the desktop or a
> folder.
>
> But, give me a suggestion then. Do I open a bug with the Firefox people
you should open a firefox bug upstream or on launchpad, as written
before the issue described there is due to the new gio glib code but
firefox is not using it so the bug you are having is a different issue
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received
My comment wasn't just about the camera issue. I'be found the same
change in behavior when copying a file from Firefox to the desktop or a
folder.
But, give me a suggestion then. Do I open a bug with the Firefox people
or with the Gnome people or with the Ubuntu people? It just seems odd
that s
those camera import issue are an another issue, you should open a bug on
the application you are using rather, this bug was about the new gio
library that nautilus is using in hardy, neither of the photo managing
applications in the standard hardy installation are using it so the
issue is a differe
I'll need some help getting this to the right group but it seems there
is a larger problem here.
People have reported a "bug" or "feature" in that Nautilus was not
preserving timestamps, in particular, the file modification date, when
doing file copies. I see the comments that this has been fixed
If it's not a nautilus bug, why fix it in itrepid?
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
the bug has been fixed differently in nautilus in intrepid
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Please fix this in intrepid ASAP.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
Target: None => intrepid-alpha-2
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug not
Copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
camera import is a different case, you should open a bug against the
application you are using
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
I have applied all the updates and I'm still getting the system
date/time when the system imports files from my camera instead of the
creation date.
It was copying files from a usb stick that initially got my attention.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
did you read this bug before commenting? the fixed version has been
uploaded some days ago already, if you still have an issue using it you
likely have an another issue and should open a new bug describing it in
details
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
I think it is REALLY URGENT that a general fix get out there for all Ubuntu
users. I (and everyone else) am wildly promoting 8.04 as the Vista
alternative... and it strikes me as plain silly to not fix this problem pronto.
It is so off-putting to use an OS that cannot keep file dates correct..
Hi,
it works fine.
Thanks.
Regards
Obelix
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
(I started in the duplicate bug page, for the same problem with ntfs
partitions)
Really appreciate that someone(s) is/are attempting to fix this issue.
But...
Have applied the supposed fix (2.16.3-1ubuntu3), rebooted etc Bug
still active. Then applied all changes on the proposed list (relying
Just done all proposes update.
Connected camera via usb. Imported photo's via F-spot and Gthumb only to fine
that the date modified was todays date, ie the creation date on my pc, and not
the date the picture was taken. Previously files imported in gutsy had the date
taken as the modified date.
Verification done:
- test with glib (2.16.3-1ubuntu2), created a file on another partition with
date of last year, after copy it to my desktop folder the timestamp is not
preserved.
- test with glib from proposed (2.16.3-1ubuntu3), same file from that partition
with an old creation date, after
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Looks good! (tested ext3 -> ext3, ext3 <-> encfs)
Note for other testers: The fix is in package libglib2.0-0 .
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Target: None => ubuntu-8.04.1
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
confirming for SRU because this is a regression from 7.10.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Target: None => ubuntu-8.04.1
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
Target: ubuntu-8.04.1 => None
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
Nauti
reading the upstream comments the glib and nautilus changes should be
equivalent. the glib change has a clear behaviour though and is what
alexander who wrote the code suggested so seems to be a good option for
a stable update, gio is not used by many applications in hardy anyway
and the change sho
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:2.23.4-0ubuntu1
---
nautilus (1:2.23.4-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
* New upstream version:
- Fix background extension submenus for background context menus
- Fix thumbnailing
- Always re-thumbnail if a file without any t
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Great! Thanks for your commitment, Sebastien!
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15265798/unnamed
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
nominating for hardy, I'll look at fixing that one
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
that's not a nautilus issue
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Invalid
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
> but be careful!!! My nautilus just crashed.
I saw a similar crash _before_ I installed the patched packages, so I
don't think it is related.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
apt line for Tormod Volden's PPA is:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/tormodvolden/ubuntu/ hardy main
but be careful!!! My nautilus just crashed. I will try to reproduce it and grab
a terminal output...
That was in messages log:
nautilus[6925]: segfault at eip b75bb307 esp bf8cb7f4 error
-
Can I ask what is a PPA version? :) and how do I download it? Thanks.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
> could you not abuse the official versionning otherwise the next ubuntu
update will not be installed for user installing your version?
If you check better you'll see that the PPA version has ~tormod tagged
to it so it will indeed be updated at next Ubuntu update. The attached
debdiff has not, sin
could you not abuse the official versionning otherwise the next ubuntu
update will not be installed for user installing your version? also you
should better wait for an official fix rather than push random changes
to users
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2154
THANK YOU!
downloaded and installed. Copies perfectly now!
At last 8.04 is fully operational! )) now I can upgrade it on all my
computers from 7.10
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
So how can I use the modified package until ubuntu finally choses to
take the patch over?
I agree about the bad signs of those (non-)happenings upstream.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
glib2.0 packages with this patch applied are available in my PPA.
** Attachment added: "debdiff from 2.16.3-1ubuntu2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15201988/glib2.0_2.16.3-1ubuntu3.debdiff
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notif
Looking at the upstream "progress" doesn't really reassure me. There was
a patch in April, a few developers commented on it middle of May. Isn't
this a case where we just have to fix it in Ubuntu as soon as possible,
and rather reharmonize with upstream whenever they will reach consensus
on their i
don't open a nautilus bug if that's not a bug in the nautilus code,
having the glib one is enough
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a
No one said it is. I only marked that it *affects* Nautilus.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
that's not a nautilus bug
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Invalid
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
...tired to fireup gnome-commander or grsync every time I need to copy
something important. Hope fix will be delivered soon.
It is the only problem that prevents me from enjoying Hardy. Fix it, and the
system will be close to perfectness!
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.laun
That's great! Thank you!
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
we will consider a backport once upstream agree on the changes
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Will this be fixed after the patches have been accepted?
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
it's a glib one. re assigning.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: nautilus => glib2.0
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
kbit, yes there's a couple of patches upstream but they need to be
accepted first.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The upstream progress and patch (see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515777) seem to be pretty
nautilus-centered, though.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Maybe it is not a Nautilus bug? Please look at
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=805095
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Confirmed.
Fix this, please.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Unknown => In Progress
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Good news: in Gnome Bugzilla this bug was reassigned to GIO, and work on
the patch has started. Hope an upgrade for Ubuntu will be packaged as
soon as possible.
offtopic: please, do not think in the ways of paper bureaucracy. This is really
bad way of thinking. I live in Russia, so I know what I'
Gnome-bugzilla is too high-level for the average ubuntu user (like me)
Therefore I truly hope that the resolution of this bug will be used for an
updated package in ubuntu 8.04 LTS given its LTS status.
Nautilus should preserve timestamp by default wherever possible, in
local system file copying
Thanks Sebastian, I didn't think to look over there. I can't believe the
discussion has been dragging on for over 2 months now.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
not right now, that's an upstream request, not sure if the current
behaviour is a design decision or not
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this b
That is being discussed upstream on
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515777
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gvfs => nautilus
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
** Also affects: nautilus via
http://bugzi
wishlist? well... i wish not to loose my time based files&folders
structure
is there a way to manually tweak gvfs to safe behavior for now?
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Thank you for your bug report. That's not really a bug, the standard cp
behaviour is the same, having an option to select that would be nice
though
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: nautilus => gvfs
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://
Just tested gnome-commander... works OK. so, problem is in nautilus & cp
! Until this bug is fixed, I recommend to use gnome-commander instead of
nautilus in order to save timestamps !
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification
Confirmed.
Fix this, please.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Confirming!!!
Hardy, fully up to date, relative to this message.
generic and rt kernels
Not only Nautilus looses timestamps, cp command also does.
can't fully use my laptop because of this, usual file sync with desktop
totally wrecked.
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => nautilus
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
Oops, this is 8.04 beta up-to-date as of April 10
--
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
93 matches
Mail list logo
