I think it is REALLY URGENT that a general fix get out there for all Ubuntu 
users.  I (and everyone else) am wildly promoting 8.04 as the Vista 
alternative... and it strikes me as plain silly to not fix this problem pronto. 
 It is so off-putting to use an OS that cannot keep file dates correct.... that 
I'd suggest fixing it in Nautilus if needs be, and if/when lower level modules 
are fixed to no longer cause the problem, THEN remove the workaround in 
Nautilus.
The suggestion that it has anything to do with 'design decisions' is a 
FURPHY... There is NO JUSTIFICATION for 'touching' (ie redating) a set of files 
simply because they are copied unaltered to another location (esp on same 
computer).  The bug is presumably that, as permissions are added to files not 
in *nix file system, someone decided to 're-date' file, as if someone had 
edited something.... but it will always be just a bug.  The Russian commentator 
was right - when you have two copies of a file (unaltered) you have two 
instances of the one file and NOT two files of different dates!
The fact that you can't 'reliably' copy photos from your camera, or files off a 
removable drive etc is a SEVERE error for any user.  Yes, you can use Archive 
Manager to do a tar.gz zip file of them and then Extract them on the target 
drive... but it slows down a file copy 50x.  The error is so severe as to 
prevent average users from using the OS... so it is critical that it be fixed 
FOR ALL USERS quickly.
Graeme (30 years IT experience, former Harvard Consultant to The White House on 
IT policy, on team of five which developed first electronic spreadsheet - 
Visicalc - at Harvard Business School in 1978, etc)

-- 
Nautilus not preserving timestamps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to