Just ran into this (9-year-old ?) problem on my Ubuntu 14.04 PPC system.
Used workaround of editing gai.conf (as mentioned earlier in this
thread) to prefer IPV4 connections.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Public bug reported:
I don't know if this is a bug. It may not be. My Xubuntu system popped
up a dialog that said it had detected one, so I went ahead and let it
submit this report. I had been installing and removing rsyslog,
rsyslog-pgsql, postgresql several times, trying to get rsyslog to log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021527
Title:
Installer crashed after hitting escape key during a dialog
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
Public bug reported:
This all happened while installing Ultimate 3.4 onto an existing
machine, doing a clean install on a partition that was used for an
earlier installation of Ultimate-Edition. I was installing to existing
partition sda8, but at the end of the install, I was told that the
bootlo
l all work OK the next time.
Sorry for the bogus report (though it might be good to specifically use
/usr/bin/perl).
---
Marnix A. van Ammers
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887330
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887330
Title:
package rsyslog 4.6.4-2ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
Public bug reported:
While using Update Manager to update my Ubuntu 11.04 virtual machine
running in VmWare Fusion on my iMac, a message popped up about an error.
The popup gave me the option of reporting the problem, which I did. The
update is still running. Apparently the newer rsyslog failed
This is very user unfriendly and also very easy to fix, with just one
button that says 'install required packages'.
I think it is important enough to be added before the lucid release.
** Changed in: system-config-samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
There should be a way of easily
Same behaviour still present in Lucid Alpha 2
--
GDM login theme change when using accessibility features
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402017
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
I personally do not have compiz enabled at all, so that's not the
solution to my problem.
--
Inconsistent fullscreen of Firefox in Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
I found another inconsistency:
when pressing 'F11' the windowtitlebar disappears and the page goes to
fullscreen (so it covers the whole screen) but the menubar, the
locationbar, the bookmarkbar and the tabbar all stay on the screen.
When using the menu option view->fullscreen (so using the mouse
(So this is partially a duplicate of #461334)
--
Ubuntu software Center is some occasions does not fully install software
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I noticed the same problem with Phatch. After installation, only phatch-
cli was installed, not the gui.
But for your second comment on other partially installed applications: I
think the problem with Phatch is not related to this.
--
Ubuntu software Center is some occasions does not fully insta
As far as I can tell, the problem is solved. The pages referenced to by
e2l and me do not crash anymore. Supposedly a fix is released.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
GNOME Panels crash on viewing HTML page in Firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
I got the same behaviour when i got to this page (via planet.ubuntu.com):
http://mrooney.blogspot.com/2009/04/email-deliverability-rfc-2142.html
Gnome-Panel tries to reload an infinitive amount of times, but fails to
do so until i close the tab:
dmesg | tail:
[49687.030642] gnome-panel[546]: segf
Though the original bugfiler doesn't experience the problem anymore,
Musthafa Meeran can still confirm the problem. And it does seem strange
because in the logfile the same profile, acceleration and speed are set
each time.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
My bad, it's not a question, but a bug anyway as Timo Aaltonen says. My
apologies.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
prioritize drivers in xorg.conf instead of fixing one
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333820
You received this bug notification because yo
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does
not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to
a question in the support tracker. We appreciate the difficulties you
are facing, but
Aseem:
Apologies for the late response, however, your problem seems to be unrelated to
the one described here, I suggest you to report another bug. With the
information you gave above plus the output of `lspci -vvnn` and your
/var/log/Xorg.0.log file from after reproducing this issue.
Musthafa:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - the Jaunty Jackalope. It
won't be fixed in previous versions of Ubuntu because the package
doesn't fit the requir
You are correct, the plugins require firefox 3.0
(http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/adblock-plus). I will mark it invalid
though, because when firefox 3.5 hits the street, the dependency
problems will be solved.
Feel free to comment / reopen the bug if you're not satisfied.
** Changed in: firefox
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Xserver is freezed on Startup[Intrepid Ibex Beta]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Is the problem still occuring in Intrepid Final or Jaunty Beta?
--
Xserver is freezed on Startup[Intrepid Ibex Beta]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
can learn more
I cannot reproduce your problem: when I installed 'Adblock Plus for
Firefox' through add/remove programs, the plugin was added in firefox
3.1.
--
Please make firefox-3.1 Provide: firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353120
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Can you explain a bit more?
Addons for firefox are installed in ~/.mozilla/firefox/FOO.default and
both firefox 3.0 and 3.1 use this folder. Though I don't know if thats
the case for plugins installed through the gnome-app-installer, but
those plugins can always be installed by browsing to
https:/
** Attachment added: "The Error Notification"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24641223/middlemouse.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24641224/Dependencies.txt
--
Middle mouse button invokes 'invalid URL'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353318
You rece
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.1
(Jaunty) Sometimes when just pressing the middle mouse button in
Shiretoko 3.1 Beta 3 (Firefox 3.5), an alert prompt comes up. This
happens when you don't click a link or anything, just some white area.
The strange thing: it doesn't happen alw
When you select the Dust Sand Theme in jaunty, the same thing happens as
in the screenshot of Nicolò Chieffo. That's an easy way to recreate the
bug.
** Attachment added: "indicator-applet.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24491068/indicator-applet.png
--
Wrong background colour for messagin
Dear Jean-Baptiste,
The issue seems to been caused by an incomplete package. After the
incomplete package was detected and downloaded again it worked fine. Apology
that I had not responded before.
Kind regards,
Marnix
2008/11/22 Jean-Baptiste Lallement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We are clo
I can confirm this, it gives "aperture beyond 4gb. Ignoring", but after
that it still boots.
Linux 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Thu Oct 30 04:12:22 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
--
"Aperture beyond 4GB. Ignoring." message when booting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271070
You received this bug notificat
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19088931/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19088932/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibra
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process
/usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned
an error code (1
Troy: I don't think you got the point here, although the title says
something about green, if you follow above discussion/comments, you read
that almost NObody likes this wallpaper, not only the colours, but just
the overall idea of this wallpaper.
--
New default Intrepid wallpaper is green
https
Status changed to "in progress"
I hope this means they admit the wallpaper has to be changed??
/me is very hopeful!
--
New default Intrepid wallpaper is green
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
I like the first one most, although some circles are a bit pixelated (is
that a word ?)
Nevertheless, the CURRENT wallpaper must be thrown in the trash...
--
New default Intrepid wallpaper is green
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276594
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Joshua Blount wrote: "Perhaps at this point it would be more valuable
to spend our time hacking around in GIMP or Inkscape to produce some
better options, rather than repeatedly agreeing that this wallpaper
isn't quite up to par."
The point is that the community made enough very good wallpapers (
Here is my forum post, hope it will help the discussion here, too.
"
Didn't Mark Shuttleworth spoke about being more beautiful than Apple at OSCON
2008? Don't we all want to fix bug #1?
The first impression of Ubuntu is THE MOST IMPORTANT PART of attracting
new users. Booting has to be more attr
38 matches
Mail list logo
