Hello Heiko Schocher,
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Heiko Schocher
> +static inline void mmu_setup(void)
> +{
> + static u32 __attribute__((aligned(16384))) page_table[4096];
> + bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
> + int i, j;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + /* Set up an identity-mapping for all
Hello Heiko,
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:56 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: U-Boot user list; Alessandro Rubini
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/26] ARM: cp15: setup mmu and enable
> dcache
Hello Heiko,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Heiko Schocher
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:46 PM
> To: U-Boot user list
> Cc: Alessandro Rubini
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/26] ARM: cp15: setup mmu and
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Vipin Kumar
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:52 PM
> To: Stefan Roese
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Shiraz HASHIM
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Multiple binaries built through u
Hi Nishanth
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:30 PM
> To: Steve Sakoman
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: OMAP4: Calculate SDR
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 8:07 PM
> To: Nishanth Menon
> Cc: V, Aneesh; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Steve Sakoman
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: OMAP4: Calculate SDRAM size
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of V, Aneesh
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:03 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk; Nishanth Menon
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Steve Sakoman
>
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:13:39 -0700, Aneesh V wrote:
>> On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>> > +Tom
>> >
>> > Hi Lucas,
>> >
>> > On 06/22/2012 04:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> >> Hi Albert,
>> >>
>> >> Am Fre
Hi Allen,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
> If CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD is enabled, use thumb interworking return
> instructions from libgcc routines, otherwise use ARM returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Martin
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h | 10 ++
> arch
Hi Allen,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:11:48PM -0700, V, Aneesh wrote:
> > Hi Allen,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Allen Martin amar...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
> > If CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD is enabl
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I *think* I've finished getting in all patches that should have gone
Hi Sandeep,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Le 12/08/2011 20:09, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> Le 12/08/2011 16:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Albert,
>>>
>>> On Friday 12 August 2011 06:53 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I *thin
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Simon Guinot wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:05:42PM +0530, Aneesh V wrote:
>> c2dd0d45540397704de9b13287417d21049d34c6 added dcache_enable()
>> to board_init_r(). This enables d-cache for all ARM boards.
>> As a result some of the arm
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Le 11/08/2011 16:35, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>
>> - Avoid enabling caches for all ARM boards
>> - Enable caches for omap3/4
>> - Stronger barrier for armv7 cache-maintenance operations.
>>
>> V2:
>> * Rebased to latest HEAD of u-boot
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>
1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
>
> This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied.
>
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1
Hi Dirk,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> ...
> 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
>>
>> This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now bu
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 21/08/2011 09:51, V, Aneesh a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
&g
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Hong Xu wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On 08/19/2011 10:20 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hong,
>>
>> On Friday 19 August 2011 02:53 PM, Hong Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> Add a new file arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/cache.c and put cache operations
>>> into this file.
>>>
>>> Signe
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Le 21/08/2011 09:11, Dirk Behme a écrit :
>
>> But, hmm,
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=summary
>>
>> doesn't show the applied patches yet? Did I miss something?
>
> You did not; I did -- forgot
Hi Sandeep, Joel,
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 11:10 PM, wrote:
> From: Joel A Fernandes
>
> Read directly from OMAP_GPIO_DATAOUT to get the output state of the GPIO pin
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes
> Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:44:05PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/01/2012 02:32 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
>> > Add function required by some thumb switch statements
>>
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/_thumb1_case_uqi.S
>> > b/arch/arm/lib
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message <4dd23561.70...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
>> In fact I had searched for a macro for similar needs as my
>> set_bit_field() is addressing in Linux Kernel too but didn't find any.
> ...
>> I couldn't find
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530
> Aneesh V wrote:
>
>> @@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber: clean
>> @[ ! -d $(obj)nand_spl ] || find $(obj)nand_spl -name "*" -type l
>> -print | xargs rm -f
>> @[ ! -d $(obj)onenand_ipl ] || fin
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 17:04:49 Simon Glass wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * An assertion is run-time check done in debug mode only. If DEBUG is not
>> + * defined then it is skipped. It does not BUG or halt U-Boot, but tries
>> to + * continue exe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Le 17/06/2011 11:30, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>
>> With D-cache and MMU enabled for ARM in u-boot it becomes imperative to
>> support a minimal set of cache maintenance operations and necessary
>> initializations before enabling MMU.
Hi Sandeep,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>> Aneesh V (11):
>> omap4: utility function to identify the context of hw init
>> omap4: cleanup pin mux data
>> omap4: add OMAP4430 revision check
>> omap4: add clock support
>> omap4: add sdram init support
>> oma
Hi Sandeep,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>> Aneesh V (11):
>> omap4: utility function to identify the context of hw init
>> omap4: cleanup pin mux data
>> omap4: add OMAP4430 revision check
>> omap4: add clock support
>> omap4: add sdram init support
>> oma
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Simon Schwarz
wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> I'am nearly done with OMAP3 - I think I can release the patch today.
>
> I have just one problem left:
> You implemented preloader_console_init() in omap-common to call
> setup_clocks_for_console(). This is a OMAP4 s
Hi Simon, Scott,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Simon Schwarz
wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
>
> On 07/26/2011 08:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:09:16 +0200
>> Simon Schwarz wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
>>> index 8b598f6..cdc9a
Hello Heiko,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Heiko Schocher
> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 1:18 PM
> To: Alexander Holler
> Cc: Darius Augulis; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] arm: wrong Relocat
Hi Heiko,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of V, Aneesh
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:10 AM
> To: h...@denx.de; Alexander Holler
> Cc: Darius Augulis; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subj
Hi Albert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:02 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: h...@denx.de; Alexander Holler; Darius Augulis; u-
> b...@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: arm: wrong Relocatio
Albert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:11 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: dar...@theia.denx.de; h...@denx.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Augulis
> Subject: Re: arm: wrong Relocation and not cleared
Dear Reinhard, Wolfgang,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Reinhard Meyer
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:04 PM
> To: Albert ARIBAUD
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] ar
Dear Wolfgang,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:33 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: Reinhard Meyer; Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jum
Dear Wofgang,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:58 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: Reinhard Meyer; Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jum
Dear Albert, Wolfgang,
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 5:38 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de
> Subject: Re: [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_
Dear Wolfgang,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: Reinhard Meyer; Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jum
Hi Kyungmin Park,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:05 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de"
> Cc: Minkyu Kang
> Subject: [U-Boot] How to use the NEON instruction at
Hi,
We would like to add a post-build step for OMAP4430SDP. The intention of this
step is to attach a header at the beginning of u-boot.bin and create a new
binary.
We do not mind having this as part of the main make step(i.e. as part of the
target ALL) or as a separate target(let's say "oma
add spaces initially. They got added when I ran "Lindent
-pcs". Is this rule not applicable anymore? Or am I missing something?
Best regards,
Aneesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 1:25 AM
> To: V, Ane
41 matches
Mail list logo
