On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530 > Aneesh V <ane...@ti.com> wrote: > >> @@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber: clean >> @[ ! -d $(obj)nand_spl ] || find $(obj)nand_spl -name "*" -type l >> -print | xargs rm -f >> @[ ! -d $(obj)onenand_ipl ] || find $(obj)onenand_ipl -name "*" -type >> l -print | xargs rm -f >> @[ ! -d $(obj)mmc_spl ] || find $(obj)mmc_spl -name "*" -type l >> -print | xargs rm -f >> + @[ ! -d $(obj)spl ] || find $(obj)mmc_spl -name "*" -type l -print | >> xargs rm -f > > That last mmc_spl should just be spl. > >> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT) += mmc/libnand.o >> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ONENAND_SUPPORT) += mmc/libonenand.o
Oops!! That was a copy paste error. It was intended to be: +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT) += nand/libnand.o +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ONENAND_SUPPORT) += onenand/libonenand.o > > Why are these in mmc? > > What is it you propose would be in these files? > >> +$(LIBS-y): depend >> + $(MAKE) -C $(dir $(subst $(obj),,$@)) all > > If no libraries are selected, this will produce a rule with an empty > target, which is undefined behavior. The top-level Makefile doesn't include any source files by itself. All SPL content comes from one or more of libraries. So, there will be at least one library defined, I believe(unless there is an error, of course). > > -Scott > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
