On Sunday 04 March 2012 21:57:23 Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> 1) Video; check if you have the following defined in your board config:
>
> #define CONFIG_VIDEO
> #define CONFIG_VIDEO_SW_CURSOR
> #define CONFIG_CFB_CONSOLE
Above options was already enabled.
> #define CONFIG_VGA_AS_SINGLE_DEVICE
When I ena
On Monday 05 March 2012 16:58:47 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 04 March 2012 23:26:29 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 March 2012 16:35:44 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > I'm not angry, but now I'm stucked, because I (and nobody other) was
> > > not able to fix problem 1) and problem 1) must be fixed
On Sunday 04 March 2012 23:26:29 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 04 March 2012 16:35:44 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > I'm not angry, but now I'm stucked, because I (and nobody other) was not
> > able to fix problem 1) and problem 1) must be fixed before pushing rx51
> > patches to master. So I cannot wor
On Sunday 04 March 2012 23:09:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Pali,
>
> In message <2426868.sD2XDEqcqE@pali> you wrote:
> > > 1) Video; check if you have the following defined in your board config:
> > >
> > > #define CONFIG_VIDEO
> > > #define CONFIG_VIDEO_SW_CURSOR
> > > #define CONFIG_CFB_CONSOLE
On Sunday 04 March 2012 22:50:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> Did you try the above solution for the video issues?
>
Not yet. I will try it.
>
> So why don't YOU fix the problem? Maybe we should try diagnosing it?
>
> I might have some time after NSWI075 on tuesday, ending 19:00, you might
> want to catc
On Sunday 04 March 2012 16:35:44 Pali Rohár wrote:
> I'm not angry, but now I'm stucked, because I (and nobody other) was not
> able to fix problem 1) and problem 1) must be fixed before pushing rx51
> patches to master. So I cannot work on rx51 patches...
i don't think these things are true. you
Dear Pali,
In message <2426868.sD2XDEqcqE@pali> you wrote:
>
> > 1) Video; check if you have the following defined in your board config:
> >
> > #define CONFIG_VIDEO
> > #define CONFIG_VIDEO_SW_CURSOR
> > #define CONFIG_CFB_CONSOLE
> > #define CONFIG_VGA_AS_SINGLE_DEVICE
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_W
> On Sunday 04 March 2012 21:57:23 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Pali Rohar,
> >
> > I suggest you to read through this whole mail properly, do not get angry
> > by the first few lines.
> >
> > > U-Boot on Nokia N900 is broken due to bug in MMC and framebuffer
> > > driver. See:
> > > http://lists.
On Sunday 04 March 2012 21:57:23 Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Pali Rohar,
>
> I suggest you to read through this whole mail properly, do not get angry by
> the first few lines.
>
> > U-Boot on Nokia N900 is broken due to bug in MMC and framebuffer driver.
> > See: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot
On Sunday 04 March 2012 15:21:23 Pali Rohár wrote:
> U-Boot on Nokia N900 is broken due to bug in MMC and framebuffer driver.
> See: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115778.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/119330.html
>
> Until now *nobody* responce to the
Dear Pali Rohar,
I suggest you to read through this whole mail properly, do not get angry by the
first few lines.
> U-Boot on Nokia N900 is broken due to bug in MMC and framebuffer driver.
> See: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115778.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-bo
On Monday 27 February 2012 21:55:31 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:10:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 February 2012 17:08:04 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > This patch series add support for new board N
> On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:10:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2012 17:08:04 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > > > > Last two patches adding on scr
On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:10:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2012 17:08:04 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > > > Last two patches adding on screen bootme
On Sunday 26 February 2012 17:08:04 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> > >
> > > This series supersedes the last sent vers
> On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> >
> > This series supersedes the last sent version.
>
> Hi, what is state of this patch series? From our discus
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
>
Hi, what is state of this patch series? From our discussion is only
> On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 you wrote:
> > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> >
> > This series supersedes the last sent version.
> >
> > Pali Rohár (14):
> > arm,omap3: Define save_boot_params
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:57 you wrote:
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
>
> Pali Rohár (14):
> arm,omap3: Define save_boot_params in lowlevel_init.S
On Friday 27 January 2012 03:59:41 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-bo
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it.
> >
> > Yes and no. No, becaue y
> On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it.
> >
> > Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign
> > SPL binary for
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > > > So why not just rep
On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it.
>
> Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign
> SPL binary for OMAP's se
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > > So why not just replace the b
Hi Marek,
On 01/26/2012 04:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
>> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
>
> Isn't on-screen bootmenu already supported by common/menu.c stuff ?
>>
>> This series supersedes the last sent ver
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > > > >
> > > > > Booting process on n900:
>
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > > >
> > > > Booting process on n900:
> > > > 1. Oma
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > >
> > > Booting process on n900:
> > > 1. Omap bootrom
> > > 2. Nokia X-Loader
> > > 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> >
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> >
> > Booting process on n900:
> > 1. Omap bootrom
> > 2. Nokia X-Loader
> > 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> > 4. Linux kernel
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
>
> Booting process on n900:
> 1. Omap bootrom
> 2. Nokia X-Loader
> 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> 4. Linux kernel
> ...
To make it clear, I own N900 myself ;-)
>
> Nokia X-Loader and
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
>
Booting process on n900:
1. Omap bootrom
2. Nokia X-Loader
3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
4. Linux kernel
...
Nokia X-Loader and NOLO are stored in first nand part. It has size 128kB.
Nokia X
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 04:48:00 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> > >
> > > This series supersedes the las
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
Isn't on-screen bootmenu already supported by common/menu.c stuff ?
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
So ... this is V2? What are the changes from previous
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 04:48:00 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> >
> > This series supersedes the last sent versio
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
A quick offtopic question - how do you replace boot loader on N9
Wolfgang,
On 01/25/2012 01:27 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
Just to let you know, I went through this submission off-list with Pal
37 matches
Mail list logo
