> On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it. > > > > Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign > > SPL binary for OMAP's secure boot ROM. IIRC N950/N9 is even more strict > > regarding that, am I right? > > You are right, we cannot sign SPL binary for N900 because we do not have > key. Signing key has only somebody in Nokia (or in TI). I do not have > N950/N9 so I do not know anything about new devices. > > > > I know. So ... ? Basically you can use the TI flashes too since it all > > > goes > > > through the bootrom, right? > > > > Butrom requires signed binary. > > Yes and format of signed binary is not published by TI (there are only some > RE info about Motorola Omap devices). > > > > > What I tried: > > > > I created mtd image where was X-Loader, NOLO and U-Boot. QEmu RX51 > > > > successfull booted this image and I got serial console and video > > > > screen output. > > > > > > > > But when I created mtd image where was only X-Loader an U-Boot, QEmu > > > > RX51 > > > > was unable to boot (it freezed). > > > > > > Why? Where? You know you can debug U-Boot in QEMU with GDB and diag the > > > problem properly? > > > > Any volunteers? (I own N900 too, ah, I own 3 of tham, damnit) > > I can try to play with SPL U-Boot binary and X-Loader in qemu. But this and > next month I do not have time for it...
You're just lazy ... what exam can take you so much time ? :-p _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
