On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:25:59 Sergey Lapin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > What do you mean, you don't need xloader, u-boot SPL can replace it. > > > > Yes and no. No, becaue you nor I have no Nokia's signing key(s) to sign > > SPL binary for OMAP's secure boot ROM. IIRC N950/N9 is even more strict > > regarding that, am I right? > > You are right, we cannot sign SPL binary for N900 because we do not have key. > Signing key has only somebody in Nokia (or in TI). I do not have N950/N9 so I > do not know anything about new devices.
Probably autobuilder does have a key, but the question is if key is different for each device or not. > > > > > > > I know. So ... ? Basically you can use the TI flashes too since it all > > > goes > > > through the bootrom, right? > > > > Butrom requires signed binary. > > > > Yes and format of signed binary is not published by TI (there are only some > RE > info about Motorola Omap devices). Well, format is somewhat documented in public TI specifications, but that won't help anyway becase of OMAP's little OTP memory... > > I can try to play with SPL U-Boot binary and X-Loader in qemu. But this and > next month I do not have time for it... Me neither. All the best, S. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
