On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:55 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
>> The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
>> the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
>> layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
>
On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:16 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Becky Bruce wrote:
>>> We *do* need a comment in the release notes for this revision of u-
>>> boot
>>> that the map for 8641 has changed so it doesn't catch anyone by
>>> surprise.
>>
>>
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:16 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Becky Bruce wrote:
> > We *do* need a comment in the release notes for this revision of u-boot
> > that the map for 8641 has changed so it doesn't catch anyone by surprise.
>
> How about a runtime check in the board fdt code to print a warnin
Becky Bruce wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> How about a runtime check in the board fdt code to print a warning if
>> it finds an old device tree? Unfortunately, using new dts with old
>> u-boot isn't as easy to detect.
>
> Where exactly were you thinking this would go?
On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Becky Bruce wrote:
>> We *do* need a comment in the release notes for this revision of u-
>> boot that the map for 8641 has changed so it doesn't catch anyone
>> by surprise.
>
> How about a runtime check in the board fdt code to print a warning
Becky Bruce wrote:
> We *do* need a comment in the release notes for this revision of u-boot
> that the map for 8641 has changed so it doesn't catch anyone by surprise.
How about a runtime check in the board fdt code to print a warning if it
finds an old device tree? Unfortunately, using new dt
On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:55 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
>> The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
>> the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
>> layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
>
On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Becky Bruce wrote:
>> The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
>> the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
>> layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
>> the flash.
>> The regions for some
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:55 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
> The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
> the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
> layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
> the flash.
>
> The regions for some of the mappings w
Becky Bruce wrote:
> The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
> the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
> layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
> the flash.
>
> The regions for some of the mappings were far larger than they
> needed t
The memory map on the 8641hpcn is modified to look more like
the 85xx boards; this is a step towards a more standardized
layout going forward. As part of this change, we now relocate
the flash.
The regions for some of the mappings were far larger than they
needed to be. I have reduced the mapping
11 matches
Mail list logo
