On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:16 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> Becky Bruce wrote: >>> We *do* need a comment in the release notes for this revision of u- >>> boot >>> that the map for 8641 has changed so it doesn't catch anyone by >>> surprise. >> >> How about a runtime check in the board fdt code to print a warning >> if it >> finds an old device tree? Unfortunately, using new dts with old u- >> boot >> isn't as easy to detect. >> >> -Scott > > > For the record, and admittedly not quite an answer to > your issue at all, though I feel it would mitigate the > pain dramatically, I have a version of the DTS file that > uses my new expression language to completely abstract > out the 32/36-bit differences and compile a DTB for either > with the single flip of a -DUSE_36_BIT handed to the dtc > command line. > > Even if no one cares.
I think that's something we need to talk about..... what are the plans for switching over to the new language? I'll push a simple patch to change the 32-bit memory map, but when we go 36-bit in Linux, this might make sense. -B _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
