Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

On 09/08/2014 05:57 PM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > > 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : > >> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a >> user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig. >> "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi, On 09/09/2014 12:44 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: > Hi Masahiro, > >> Hi Samsung developers, >> Simon Glass, >> >> >> 2014-09-09 1:10 GMT+09:00 Masahiro YAMADA : >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-09 0:58 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi Daniel, On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:23:05 +0200 Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > > > diff --git a/dts/Kconfig b/dts/Kconfig > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..98b2357 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/dts/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ > > +# > > +# Device Tree Control > > +# > > +# TODO: > > +# T

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi Samsung developers, Simon Glass, 2014-09-09 1:10 GMT+09:00 Masahiro YAMADA : > Hi Stephen, > > > 2014-09-09 0:58 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : >> On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: >>> >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : >>> I don't believe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi Masahiro, On 07.09.2014 10:43, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > This commit moves: > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE > CONFIG_OF_EMBED > CONFIG_OF_HOSTFILE > > Because these options are currently not supported for SPL, > the "Device Tree Control" menu does not appear in the SPL > config

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi Stephen, 2014-09-09 0:58 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : > On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> >> >> 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : >> >>> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a >>> user-configurable option, and hence s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote: Hi Stephen, 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig. "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

Hi Stephen, 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren : > I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a > user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig. > "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though. I think it depends on t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

On 09/07/2014 02:43 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: This commit moves: CONFIG_OF_CONTROL CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE CONFIG_OF_EMBED CONFIG_OF_HOSTFILE Because these options are currently not supported for SPL, the "Device Tree Control" menu does not appear in the SPL configuration. Note: zynq-co

[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig

This commit moves: CONFIG_OF_CONTROL CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE CONFIG_OF_EMBED CONFIG_OF_HOSTFILE Because these options are currently not supported for SPL, the "Device Tree Control" menu does not appear in the SPL configuration. Note: zynq-common.h should be adjusted so as not to change the def