Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:59:35PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, And

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wild

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > > >> What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > >> What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees without any > >> changes? This diff I attach inline copies all a64, h3

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Jagan Teki
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt: >> What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees without any >> changes? This diff I attach inline copies all a64, h3 and h5 related >> files from v4.12-rc3 (so, mainline) and modifies t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 01.06.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > What's holding us up from using the Linux device trees without any > changes? This diff I attach inline copies all a64, h3 and h5 related > files from v4.12-rc3 (so, mainline) and modifies the emac driver to > use the new pinmux attributes. Andre or

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:45:03PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > > Hej Patrick, > > > > > > > > Am 09.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:45:03PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > Hej Patrick, > > > > > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basicall

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-06-01 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Hej Patrick, > > > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > >> replaced the SoC with the 64-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-24 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 24.05.2017 um 14:44 schrieb Andre Przywara: > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: >>> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they >>> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) >>> defco

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Hej Patrick, > > > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > >> replaced the SoC with the 64-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-24 Thread Andre Przywara
Hi, On 24/05/17 12:50, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hej Patrick, > > Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: >> The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they >> replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) >> defconfig defining the required opt

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-24 Thread Andreas Färber
Hej Patrick, Am 09.05.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Patrick Wildt: > The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) > defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper. > > Create a new .dts

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they > replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) > defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper. > > Create a new .

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: sunxi: initial support for NanoPi Neo2

2017-05-09 Thread Patrick Wildt
The NanoPi Neo2 is basically the same as the NanoPi Neo, but that they replaced the SoC with the 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC. Add a (64-bit only) defconfig defining the required options to build the U-Boot proper. Create a new .dts file for it by including the (32-bit) H3 SoC .dtsi and changing the d