Dear Wolfgang:
I will withdraw this patch.
Feng
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Mon 2/22/2010 12:54 PM
To: Feng Kan
Cc: Stefan Roese; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ppc4xx: add support for alternate format for
ndfc
D
Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit
> 77e7273c40315abd2f3c17ad8d46a78950e3e65f:
> Jens Scharsig (1):
> new board (eb_cpux9k2)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master
>
> Ladislav Michl (8):
> NetStar: eeprom - undefined
commit 98d92d8c9f4021629a45261ad5ec3f3595f3a27a "sbc8349: fix incorrect
comment" missed this one.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips
---
include/configs/vme8349.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/vme8349.h b/include/configs/vme8349.h
index dbc1
Configuring for MPC837XEMDS board...
imximage.c: In function ‘imximage_parse_cfg_file’:
imximage.c:146: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘getline’ from incompatible
pointer type
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:116: note: expected ‘size_t *’ but argument is of
type ‘uint32_t *’
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillip
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:16:02 +0100
Stefano Babic wrote:
> Running mkimage to generate an imximage produces a SEGFAULT
> on 64 bit machines due to pointer arithmetic limited to 32 bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> ---
Acked-by: Kim Phillips
..in that it gets rid of most warnings in a typi
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:52:56 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Out-of-tree build for MPC8315ERDB_NAND configuration failed with
> /bin/sh: line 0: cd: /tmp/foo/nand_spl/board/freescale/mpc8315erdb: No such
> file or directory
> error message
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
applied.
Thanks
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:28:12 -0600
Kim Phillips wrote:
> and avoid e.g., two identical boards from causing random networking
> conflicts when hooked up to the same network.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips
> ---
applied.
Kim
___
U-Boot mailing list
U
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for your kind guidance, I just want to rephrase my understanding as
your guidance.
1. The file that I want to build should be raw binary file like we have
u-boot.bin
2. Find out right address to load the binary file as per board.
Is this correct? If yes, I have a very limited
fix pointer dereferencing
if the size is .b and .w an 8 or 16 bit access is done.
Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
---
common/cmd_itest.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_itest.c b/common/cmd_itest.c
index 5b301bf..58c5e7b 100644
--- a/
Hi Matthias,
I did update my board after applying the patch you sent and I found no
problem with booting up
of the board. The only visible change to me was in U-Boot version string
with latest time stamp
and -dirty appended as below.
Before Update:
U-Boot 2009.11-00400-g77e7273 (Feb 21 2010 - 01:
Hi Vipul,
El Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:25:01PM -0800 Vipul Jain ha dit:
>I did update my board after applying the patch you sent and I found no
>problem with booting up
>of the board. The only visible change to me was in U-Boot version string
>with latest time stamp
>and -dirty
Dear Feng Kan,
In message <2b3b2aa816369a4e87d7be63ec9d2f260615a...@sdcexchange01.ad.amcc.com>
you wrote:
>
> There is not a particular board that is stuck on this 213 format. Rather,
> for sometime u-boot
> and linux both had the 213 ordering. Lets say the guy did not have the SMC
> define
Hi Stefan:
There is not a particular board that is stuck on this 213 format. Rather, for
sometime u-boot
and linux both had the 213 ordering. Lets say the guy did not have the SMC
define turned on,
which mean the ECC would caculate correctly for him. Now, he gets a new U-boot
and want
to upd
Dear Achim Ehrlich,
In message <4b827909.3010...@taskit.de> you wrote:
>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R
> >> +void reset_phy(void)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACB
> >
> >
> > CONFIG_MACB seems to be an undocumented variable. What is it supposed
> > to do?
>
> It switches on the pin initializ
Hello Achim,
[...]
>>> diff --git a/board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c b/board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000..dc6ac63
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2007-2008
>>> + * Stelian Pop
>>> + * Le
Hello Detlef,
>> Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich
>> ---
>> Makefile |9 ++
>> board/taskit/stamp9G20/Makefile| 56 ++
>> board/taskit/stamp9G20/config.mk |1 +
>> board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c | 35 ++
>> board/taskit/stamp9G20/partition.
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> In message <4b7c14ec.7050...@taskit.de> you wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich
>> ---
> ...
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -2906,6 +2906,15 @@ TNY_A9260_config : unconfig
>> @echo "#define CONFIG_$(@:_config=) 1" >$(obj)include/config.h
>>
Hello,
> Hi,
>
>> Hi, we are Enrico & Luca.
>
> Hi Enrico and Luca, welcome aboard!
>
>> We have tried to port u-boot to a Portux920T MiniPC.
>> It seems we are successful, in fact u-boot brings up the device with no
>> error and can boot a linux kernel.
>> Ethernet driver works, dhcp works and
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:30:06PM +0530, Thirumalai wrote:
> Hi denx,
> I just want to know whether the coldfire processor is supported by
> u-boot and what toolchains need to be used for compilation. Whether ELDK
> will support or not ?
starting with the downside: unfortunately there
Hi Frans,
> fix pointer dereferencing
> if the size is .b and .w an 8 or 16 bit access is done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
> ---
> common/cmd_itest.c |9 ++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_itest.c b/common/cmd_itest.c
> index 5
Hi denx,
I just want to know whether the coldfire processor is supported by
u-boot and what toolchains need to be used for compilation. Whether ELDK
will support or not ?
Thank you
Thirumalai
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://li
Hi Frans,
> From: Frans
You should adjust your git settings before committing to git, i.e. do a
"git config --global user.email ". Otherwise "git email
sends mails to "fr...@frans" as already happened if you check the
headers.
Cheers
Detlev
--
He thinks he's really smooth, but he's only C^
Hi Feng,
On Friday 19 February 2010 19:27:24 Feng Kan wrote:
> Agreed the ordering is working now. Previously the ordering is 213 and with
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC defined, wrong ECC error bit position was
> calculated. What about the boards that are now stuck on the 213 ordering.
Which boards a
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:53 PM
> To: U-Boot user list
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk; Scott Wood; Stefan Roese
> Subject: [PATCH v6] arm: add support for the suen3 board from keymile
>
> Add support
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> In message <4b8231ff.1050...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>> That way it becomes possible to test against a value and
>>> use that to influence the boot process.
>> Ah, I see, but again, if you read from an eeprom, use the eeprom
>> command.
>
> The intention is t
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4b8231ff.1050...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > That way it becomes possible to test against a value and
> > use that to influence the boot process.
>
> Ah, I see, but again, if you read from an eeprom, use the eeprom
> command.
The intention is to be able to read fr
Dear "Teh Kok How",
please do not top-post / full quote.
In message <8f43dbaafe554067877fd8568cab4...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
>
> Sorry, been away for 1 week. The constant 10 is the size of an array
> that is arbitrarily chosen so that it is big enough to hold the current mtd
> device
Dear Vipul Jain,
In message you
wrote:
>
> Some of the things that I have tried and would like to share with you.
Please re-read the documentation, carefully.
> 2. as mine is ARM, I know that only file I am interested in is
> examples/standalone/hello_world
> why? because its in ARM ELF f
28 matches
Mail list logo
