[U-Boot] [Request for Help] Building Linux for embedded x86 - Where to start

2010-01-23 Thread Graeme Russ
Hello All, I am now at the point with my x86 board where everything that needs to be implemented in U-Boot has been done. Its been a lot of work, a lot of it very frustrating and annoying, but all well worth it - For me at least, and I hope for U-Boot in general and for anyone else that goes looki

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] asm-arm/unaligned.h: switch to asm-generic/unaligned.h

2010-01-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 23 January 2010 20:18:04 Tom wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > > --- > > note: havent compile tested this, but it should be straight forward ... > > I have compile tested this. > It is fine. > > Was this run tested ? if i cant compile. i cant run >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] asm-arm/unaligned.h: switch to asm-generic/unaligned.h

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Mike Frysinger wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- > note: havent compile tested this, but it should be straight forward ... I have compile tested this. It is fine. Was this run tested ? I see this was imported from the kernel. Please include the version of the kernel this came from.

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 7/7] Add 720Mhz support for Beagle Rev C4

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From c0bdd7fbdf343ada1ecc65541ec3de1a5fdbfe79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:51:04 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Add 720Mhz support for Beagle Rev C4 > > Use the Generic TWL and Clock APIs to get beagle > Rev C4 running a

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 6/7] Enable DSS driver for Beagle

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From fe824eb530338182503dd75d466374ac2e96c063 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:35:40 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Enable DSS driver for Beagle > > Configures DSS to display color bar on Svideo > Configures DSS to display b

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 5/7] Add DSS driver for OMAP3

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From cf8fa28973de7609d27146730d9e019b7c919b51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:57:28 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Add DSS driver for OMAP3 > > Supports dynamic panel configuration > Supports dynamic tv standard selection >

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP:[PATCH 4/7] Add support for 720Mhz

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From 977856ac122e451a8de195d9f22253196572157a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:32:42 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Add support for 720Mhz > > A New API to allow setting M value to support 720Mhz > > Signed-off-by: Syed Moh

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 3/7] API to set twl4030 voltage and dev group

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From ca6c186c40fafaf0bf53f5f3e90057c0a34374f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:22:09 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] API to set twl4030 voltage and dev group > > V3: > Incorporated review comments to set voltage first > and t

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 2/7] Enable I2C bus switching

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From 9bb1c3501c8f098dac6e224c99e409ebf92b0ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:11:14 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Enable I2C bus switching > > OMAP3 supports Multiple I2C channels, this patch allows > us to use i2c dev co

Re: [U-Boot] TI:OMAP: [PATCH 1/7] OMAP3 Beagle Update revision detection

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote: > From 2dce4d64339a26144eac2ed56eb664cc1ea527c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Syed Mohammed Khasim > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:03:42 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3 Beagle Update revision detection > > New BeagleBoard revision C4 uses a new ID. Update revision detect

[U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] tsec: do not print Speed: if using netconsole

2010-01-23 Thread Ed Swarthout
CONFIG_NETCONSOLE on the p2020ds is functional with the tsec driver. But the printf in adjust_link() which is called by startup_tsec() called by tsec_init() in tsec.c is making it impossible to use. For example typing 12345 on the netconsole causes the message to be printed for every character: =

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request

2010-01-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <4b5b2a8d.10...@windriver.com> you wrote: > > In the future I will use arm/master Thanks. > >> Prafulla Wadaskar (2): > >>Kirkwood: Upgated licencing for files imported from linux source to > >> GPLv2 > >> or later > > > > I cannot find any patch with this subject

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh OTC570 board support

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > This patch adds support for esd gmbh OTC570 board. > The OTC570 is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski For u-boot-video. Maybe some u-boot commands that could be common. > --- > MAINTAINERS |1 + > MAKEALL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SPI: Fix 32 bit transfers in mxc_spi.c

2010-01-23 Thread Magnus Lilja
Dear Feng and Tom, Is this in a queue somewhere to be merged? If not, could you please apply this and make a pull request for it? Bset regards, Magnus Lilja Wolfgang Denk skrev: > Dear Feng, > > can you please take care of this? > > In message <1263726375-4929-1-git-send-email-lilja.mag...@gm

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <4b5b134b.5060...@windriver.com> you wrote: >> Please pull from ARM master-sync > > Can you please try and use the "master" branch for such pull requests? Ok. At the current time arm/master is merged with u-boot/master arm/master-sync is rebased wi

[U-Boot] ARM regressions

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Latest arm/master has these regressions imx27lite mxc_nand.c:152: warning: 'nand_hw_eccoob_largepage' defined but not used various smc9111_eeprom.o memset problem. patch for is in u-boot-net / 9d232cf1c3fdc7c23479eb128c58ccbd36da1ee3 smc9_eeprom: fix linking error Tom ___

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request

2010-01-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <4b5b134b.5060...@windriver.com> you wrote: > > Please pull from ARM master-sync Can you please try and use the "master" branch for such pull requests? Thanks. > Daniel Gorsulowski (1): >at91: Enable slow master clock on meesc board > > Minkyu Kang (1): >s5

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ppc4xx/master (v2)

2010-01-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <201001230931.27896...@denx.de> you wrote: > The following changes since commit 57ae8a5cced612088104303777e71a3dc89c00ef: > Detlev Zundel (1): > mpc512x: Use in/out accessors for all registers > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.den

[U-Boot] ARM pull request

2010-01-23 Thread Tom
Wolfgang, Please pull from ARM master-sync Thanks, Tom The following changes since commit 57ae8a5cced612088104303777e71a3dc89c00ef: Detlev Zundel (1): mpc512x: Use in/out accessors for all registers are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm master-sync

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9 V3] new board (eb_cpux9k2)

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* support for EB+CPUx9K2 board by BuS Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG * select via make eb_cpux9k2_config * this also demonstrates, how to use boards with AT91RM9200 cpu in at91 arch tree Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- MAINTAINERS| 14 +- MAKEALL|

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9 V3] new at91_emac network driver (NET_MULTI api)

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* add's at91_emac (AT91RM9200) network driver (NET_MULTI api) * enable driver with CONFIG_DRIVER_AT91EMAC * generic PHY initialization * modify AT91RM9200 boards to use NET_MULTI driver * the drivers has been tested with LXT971 Phy and DM9161 Phy at MII and RMII interface Signed-off-by: Jen

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9 V3] prepare joining at91rm9200 into at91

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* prepare joining at91 and at91rm9200 * please read README.soc-at91 for details Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91/Makefile | 47 + cpu/arm920t/at91/lowlevel_init.S | 177 cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c | 59

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9 V3] update at91sam9263ek board to new SoC access

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* convert at91sam9263ek board to use c stucture SoC access * demonstates how to use new SoC Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c | 147 +++-- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c |9 +- include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 V3] convert all at91 files to use at91_gpio driver syntax

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* convert all files cpu/../at91 to use at91_gpio driver syntax * change AT91_PINP([A-F])(\d+) to AT91_PORTPIN(\1, \2), this makes all 160 AT91_PINPxxx defines obsolete * AT91_PINPxxx defines can be remove if all boards converted to new SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/ar

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V3] convert common files to new SoC access

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* convert common files in cpu/../at91 and a lot of drivers to use c stucture SoC access * add's a warning to all files, which need update to new SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c |4 + cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9261_devices.c|4

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9 V3] add a new AT91 GPIO driver

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* add a real AT91 GPIO driver instead of header inline code * change board config files to use new driver Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/gpio/Makefile |1 + drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 240 include/asm-arm/arch-at91/gpio.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 V3] add c structures for SoC access

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* add's c structures for SoC access to pheriperials head files * add's missing pheriperials head files (new SoC) Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_matrix.h | 125 +++ include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_pdc.h| 41 + include/

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V3] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
* add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs * This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated SoC is used. * please see README.at91-soc for details Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9 V3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
What this Patch set do: * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs that not converted by this patch * add's a warning to all files, that not converted by this patch * add's the support for AT91RM9200 in at91 tree * add's c stucture SoC defines * convert all files cpu/../at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

2010-01-23 Thread Jens Scharsig
Hello Tom, > By bisectable, i mean that early patches do not depend on later patches. > It should be possible to just apply patch 1 without applying any of > the other patch. > > Patch 1 looks like is contains the union of all the config file changes. > What it should have contained was only 1 cha

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ppc4xx/master (v2)

2010-01-23 Thread Stefan Roese
The following changes since commit 57ae8a5cced612088104303777e71a3dc89c00ef: Detlev Zundel (1): mpc512x: Use in/out accessors for all registers are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master Felix Radensky (1): ppc4xx: Fix sending type 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc4xx: Fix sending type 1 PCI transactions

2010-01-23 Thread Stefan Roese
On Saturday 23 January 2010 00:35:24 Felix Radensky wrote: > The list of 4xx SoCs that should send type 1 PCI transactions > is not defined correctly. As a result PCI-PCI bridges and devices > behind them are not identified. The following 4xx variants should > send type 1 transactions: 440GX, 440GP

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc4xx: Fix sending type 1 PCI transactions

2010-01-23 Thread Stefan Roese
On Saturday 23 January 2010 00:35:24 Felix Radensky wrote: > The list of 4xx SoCs that should send type 1 PCI transactions > is not defined correctly. As a result PCI-PCI bridges and devices > behind them are not identified. The following 4xx variants should > send type 1 transactions: 440GX, 440GP

Re: [U-Boot] ELDK for P2020/P2010

2010-01-23 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear vinay hegde, In message <173890.85148...@web7703.mail.in.yahoo.com> you wrote: > > Can someone please let me know which ELDK supports P2020/P2010 (Freescale) > processors? Yes, it does, and this is explicitly documented - see http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/ELDKSupportedTargetArchitectur

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ppc4xx/master

2010-01-23 Thread Stefan Roese
The following changes since commit 57ae8a5cced612088104303777e71a3dc89c00ef: Detlev Zundel (1): mpc512x: Use in/out accessors for all registers are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master Felix Radensky (1): ppc4xx: Fix sending type 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix sending type 1 PCI transactions

2010-01-23 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 21 January 2010 23:47:21 Felix Radensky wrote: > The list of 4xx SoCs that should send type 1 PCI transactions > is not defined correctly. As a result PCI-PCI bridges and devices > behind them are not identified. The following 4xx variants should > send type 1 transactions: 440GX, 440GP