Hi All,
I was able to compile and run the u-boot for my board from both cygwin and
Linux.
The only problem I had was the uboot.lds file that in the old version had the
manual listing of the segments like this:
*(.rodata)
*(.rodata1)
*(.rodata.str1.4)
Now it uses a macro to sort them according t
Stelian Pop a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:46:50PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
>
>> On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register
>> was
>> set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
>> Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
>
Hi Francesco
Great Job!!!
I am in process doing the same for Marvell Kirkwood
Hopefully your patch will find useful for me
Regards...
Prafulla . .
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Rendine Francesco
> Sent: Tu
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
Thank you for your detailed review
2009/6/24 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> please use git
I cannot access git in the company, but I will try that at home.
> please add a MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry
ok, I will fix them
>> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroo
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
2009/6/24 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
>> +
>> +static volatile struct ftrtc010 *rtc = (struct ftrtc010
>> *)CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BASE;
>> +
>> +static void ftrtc_enable (void)
> you use it at one please only the reset
Sorry, I don't understand what do you m
It fixes the access to the 'ehci' struct elements for mpc83xx which
should have been taken care of in 4ef01010aa4799c759d75e67007fdd3a38c88c8a
Sorry about that.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan
---
cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu
This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less
PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation
error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable).
In the original code and in case of 440SPE platforms, 'ethgroup'
is initialized to -1 and never modif
This patch fixes a debug compilation error for PPC4xx platforms, all
other architectures are not affected by this change. The 'handler'
pointer was undefined. The fix is exercised and has effect only if
DEBUG is defined.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Centazzo acpa...@yahoo.com
---
cpu/ppc4xx/uic.c |
On 21:35 Tue 23 Jun , Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board
> uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM.
> FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu
> +
> +static volatile struct ftrtc010 *rtc = (struct ftrtc010
> *)CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BASE;
> +
> +static void ftrtc_enable (void)
you use it at one please only the reset
> +{
> + rtc->cr = cpu_to_le32 (FTRTC010_CR_ENABLE);
so please move this code there
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * return current time in
On 14:04 Mon 22 Jun , Scott Wood wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >no as you add the nand in this patch
> >the nand need to be add in a seperate patch,
> >this one need to only add the s3c2440 support
> >and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer
>
> If a NAND p
Hi, I am in the midst of bringing up a board using the 88E6161 chip
and was looking at your u-boot driver as an example of how to set it
up (still writing simple tests loaded via JTAG, not the full u-boot).
Our board uses the indirect method of writing to the MII bus
registers, and I think there m
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:50:29 +0200
André Schwarz wrote:
Hello André,
> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1
...
> [0001-rebased-mvBLM7-with-minor-fixes.patch text/x-patch (8.2KB)]
please use
Insert->Text File... (Alt-n x)
to insert the patch.
>
> -#define _IO_BASE 0x
> -
the a
Hi Ilya,
> This is a port of Linux driver for SDHC host controller hardware
> found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3 processors. Uses new generic MMC
> framework (CONFIG_GENERIC_MMC) and it looks like there are some
> problems with a framework (at least on LE cpus). Some of these
> problems are addressed
Hello,
I am using ELDK 4.2 and U-Boot 2009.03 on an EP88xC rev1.1 board
(MPC885 cpu) and am trying to get the example apps working (the ones
that come with U-Boot) following instructions on
"http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootStandalone#Section_5.12.2.";.
"examples/hello_world.bin" worked fin
On 00:40 Wed 24 Jun , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >> | ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
> >> | PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS+= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
> >> | else
> >> | PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS+= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
> >> | endif
>
On 15:41 Tue 23 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2009 15:26:35 Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> > > Apart from the the above reasons, currently most people who voiced their
> > > opinion (not too many right now) oppose the mo
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:46:54PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
>
> --
The git separator is three dashes, not two.
> Changes:
>
> - moved driver to drivers/mtd/nand/
> - use i/o accessors
> - don't check for AT
Olivier DAVID wrote:
> I work on a custom board, MPC8248 based (my reference BSP was MPC8260ADS),
> with uboot 1.1.4 and linux 2.6.11, and works perfectly.
>
> We have to pass to linux 2.6.27, and it is just the version from which ppc
> and powerpc has been merged,
It was merged quite a bit earli
Hi,
I work on a custom board, MPC8248 based (my reference BSP was MPC8260ADS),
with uboot 1.1.4 and linux 2.6.11, and works perfectly.
We have to pass to linux 2.6.27, and it is just the version from which ppc
and powerpc has been merged, and device tree the unique way to pass
'bdinfo'. The ub
PS
The RX errors generated by switching from the Broadcom Ethernet chips to
the National Ethernet chips are specifically RxBD_CRCERR and RxBD_NO
(defined in uec.h).
These errors are frame CRC error and Non-octet align errors respectively.
Thanks.
Christopher M. Fairfax
Sr. Software Engineer
R
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:46:50PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
> set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
> Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
The changelog message is not very c
Hi
2009/6/23 Scott Wood :
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:12:48AM +0400, Ilya Yanok wrote:
>> Driver for NFC NAND controller found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3
>> processors. Ported from Linux. Tested only with i.MX27 but should
>> works with other MX2 and MX3 processors too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:41:03PM +0100, kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
wrote:
> The S3C2410 NAND driver source file is included in the makefile instead of
> the object file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 08:13:38PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Add WATCHDOG_REFRESH() inside nand write and read
>
Please send patches inline, not as attachments. Attachments are harder
to feed into git, and in some e-mail clients are harder to quote in
replies.
Also, this should probably go
Hi
2009/6/22 Ulrich Gerster :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to boot from my board with a i.MX31 and small page (512Byte) NAND
> Flash. I applied the patches in v4 which introduce the CONFIG_PRELOADER
> macro. The only example I found where this macro is used is in part 6/6 of
> the patch. There a sep
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 15:26:35 Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> > Apart from the the above reasons, currently most people who voiced their
> > opinion (not too many right now) oppose the move. The reasoning seems
> > to be that companies using
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Also this is one of the objections worded on the mailing list, namely
> that such a cooperation will be impossible in the future if U-Boot moves
> to GPLv3.
>
> As a base for reasonable discussion, I think we need to evaluate those
>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:56:26PM +0800, wanjiutuan wrote:
> In LTIB， first I executed such command “make MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33_config；
> make”，
>
> There are some link errors in nand_spl, such as “undefined reference
> restgprXXX”, but for u-boot ,there is no problems.
This list is for upstream
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Lammerts [mailto:u-b...@lists.lammerts.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:59 PM
> To: Johan
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ilya Yanok
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] fec_imx27: driver for FEC ethernet
> controller on i.MX27
>
>
> On 06/15/09 10:01, Joha
On 13:07 Tue 23 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2009 15:42:36 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
> > if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
> >
> > in order to use these aut
Hi,
I'm trying to completely remove the 2 gigabit ethernets from my U-Boot (as
they are depopulated on my target). I want to use the other 2 ethernet
ports as FSL UEC0 and FSL UEC1.
I've removed the UCC1 and UCC2 entries from the qe_iop_conf_tab in
mpc8360erdk.c and updated the corresponding mac
On Saturday 23 May 2009 15:42:36 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
> if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
>
> in order to use these autogenerated value we need to include it also evenif
> it's
Hi Jean-Christophe,
> On 04:12 Mon 08 Jun , Ilya Yanok wrote:
>> This patch adds support for i.MX27-LITEKIT development board from
>> LogicPD. This board uses i.MX27 SoC and has 2MB NOR flash, 64MB NAND
>> flash, FEC ethernet controller integrated into i.MX27.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
Hi Shinya,
> This variable is not unused anywhere.
Makes my brain twist and after carefully applying boolean equivalence
operations contradicts the title ;)
Cheers
Detlev
--
I have always observed that the pretensions of all people are in
exact inverse ratio to their merits; this is one of t
Hello Richard,
> There's only one thing about U-Boot that doesn't seem so good:
>
> U-Boot is GPLv2 (sometimes "or later").
>
> To have some parts which are GPLv2 only is unfortunate.
This is due to us many times (re-)using Linux drivers inside U-Boot.
Also this is one of the objections word
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
> These type names (and the 'const') are in the existing s3c24x0 code so I
> just made my new code follow the same style and Lindent and checkpatch
> didn't complain. The u-boot coding style guidelines say we should use the
> Linux coding style and th
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> | ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
>> | PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
>> | else
>> | PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
>> | endif
>> |
>> | PLATFORM_LDFLAGS += -EL
>>
>> does work.
> ???
> you compile it as
This clock is needed for systems using the USB2 device unit or the 2d
graphics accelerator.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
b/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/
The current defition for CKEN_B register bits is nonsense. Adding 32 to
the shifted value is equal to '| (1 << 5)', and this bit is marked
'reserved' in the PXA docs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 delet
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll add a mandatory condition
> this code MUST be test on omap2 too
>
>
I have made a mistake on MAKEALL testing.
I will have to resubmit this patchset when the issues are resolved.
I will arrange to have this tested on an omap2
Tom
>
> I'm still thinking how to fix this issue.
>
> The problem here is, deferred expansion on PLATFORM_LDFLAGS doesn't work
> expectedly. In this case,
>
> | autoconf.mk
> | ---
> | CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y
> |
> | mips_config.mk
> | --
> |
> | ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE
Hi all,
I'm successful in provide a preliminary support to EHCI USB Freescale
controller integrated on ADS5121 platform.
I'm preparing a patch to submit to u-boot mailing list.
Regards,
Francesco.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it]
Inviato:
Hi Jean, or someone who understands U-Boot's build system well,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
> if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
>
> in order to use these autogenerated value we need
Features supported:
1. usb-phy init support (tested on sheevaplug)
This support is required to bring up USB interface
at kernel level on Kirkwood platforms
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar
---
drivers/usb/host/Makefile|1 +
drivers/usb/host/ehci-kirkwood.c | 102 ++
On kirkwood by default USB PHY is disabled
and from Linux-2.6.29 onward, phy_version for kirkwood platforms
are programmed to EHCI_PHY_NA, expecting such platform specific
setup should be done by boot loader
This patch provides arch specific requirement for usb-phy init
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wa
This patch adds an FTRTC010 driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
Index: drivers/rtc/Makefile
===
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/ctd/u-boot-2009.06/drivers/rtc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board
uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM.
FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
Index: Makefile
===
This patch adds an FTMAC100 ethernet driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
Index: drivers/net/Makefile
===
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/ctd/u-boot-2009.06/drivers/net/Makefile,v
retrieving revision
>> This is arch specific in U-Boot but I'd also check that your MIPS kernel has
>> support for a) correctly parsing the U-Boot environment provided to it and b)
>> providing the required data to other parts of the kernel for utilisation of
>> the
>> ram disk, eg initrd_start / initrd_end as an ex
On 12:46 Tue 23 Jun , Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
> On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
> set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
> Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sedji Gaouaou
> ---
> board/afe
I have created a patch for the OMAP3EVM u-boot to create an image for
download into OMAP internal RAM (64k). This allows a complete boot to
Linux over USB only, without any RS-232 serial cables. The difference
between this and Nishanth Menon's procedures (found here:
http://nishanthmenon.blogspo
On 2009-06-23, at 01:01, Peter Tyser wrote:
> This cleans up the Makefile a bit and simplifies future changes
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
> ---
> These are some similar changes to the ones I made to the tools
> directory recently. It gets rid of symlinking source files which
> has the side b
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 14:06:46 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:53 PM
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> > Scott Wood; Ashi
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 13:23:18 Dieter Kiermaier wrote:
> > > I think this would be the best to start - due to the fact
> > > that I need bitbanging for FPGA flashing, too.
> >
> > This is a good Idea, start your development with accessing GPIO registers
> > directly
>
> I start working on gpio st
Dear all,
I see that do_bootelf method is located at cmd_elf.c and this file also
includes do_bootvx method. Why is bootelf command is associated with
vxWorks?
Regards,
Cem
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinf
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:53 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> Scott Wood; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 12:38:05 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:18 PM
> > To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Scott Wood;
> > Ashi
Dear all,
Looking at the several udelay implementations for several different
architectures (an example is cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c), it seemed to me
that udelay implementations ( and other timer functions ) does not handle
timestamp overflow. This might cause unexpected timer problems.
By th
Hi Matthew,
> Hi Robert.
>
> Do you see U-Boot detecting and loading the ram disk image once you invoke
> your
> bootm command above? eg:
>
> ## Loading RAMDisk Image at 0050 ...
>Image Name: uboot ext2 ramdisk rootfs
>Created: 2009-06-15 14:39:13 UTC
>Image Type: M68
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:18 PM
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Scott Wood;
> Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot
This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board.
The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
Jean-Christophe: This patch requires an up-to-date mach-types.h,
please sync it.
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL |1 +
M
Hi Detlev,
Thanks for the answer!
> Hi Robert,
>
> root=/dev/ram is definitely correct. It was MS-DOS a while ago, which
> switched the '/'s to '\'s on stealing the hierarchical file system
> concept from Unix ;)
>
Sorry! Yes I used '/'. I just missed it.
>
> This is highly specific to the arc
Hi Robert.
> I set the bootargs variable to: root=\dev\ram (I used: set bootargs
> root=/dev/ram)
> But when I'm trying to start the Linux with the
>
> bootm 8100 81C0
>
> the Linux can't find the ramdisk. It write out:
>
> Initrd not found or empty - disabling initrd
Do you see U-Boot
On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
Signed-off-by: Sedji Gaouaou
---
board/afeb9260/afeb9260.c |6 +-
board/atmel/a
Hi All,
I am trying to boot Linux from uboot. I have cross compiled Linux and
ramdisk for my board. After cross compilation i did a tftp to download
the image(Linux + Filesystem) to RAM(0x8080) . From there i copied
it to flash(0xad04).
Now on a reset u boot comes up and then when try
Hi Giulio,
> RGB555 is a wiring with blue and red swapped, nothing more.
> Maybe I've made too much confusion before.
> And in the at91 eks there's nothing to change, because they're wired as
> BGR555.
Ok, in this case, postpone your patch until a board is in mainline which
needs this support ;)
Hi Robert,
> Can anybody help me? I'm working on this for a few days...
>
> I'm working on a custom developed board, with Au1200, and I'd like to
> use the U-Boot as bootloader. I ported the U-Boot to my board, made a
> Linux kernel image, and a ramdisk image.
>
> To try out the configuration, I
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 10:35:31 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
> > > I2C lowest priority (as per need)
> >
> > Can I do something to push I2C priority?
>
> If the I/O is shared with gpio you can use bitbanging with few hours
I think this would be the best to start - due to the fact t
On 09:21 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
> > >
> > > You just contradicted
On Monday 22 June 2009 14:30:42 Felix Radensky wrote:
> This patch fixes 2 problems with FDT EBC mappings on Canyonlands.
> First, NAND EBC mapping was missing, making Linux NAND driver
> unusable on this board. Second, NOR remapping code assumed that
> NOR is always on CS0, however when booting fr
>
> > I2C lowest priority (as per need)
> Can I do something to push I2C priority?
If the I/O is shared with gpio you can use bitbanging with few hours
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u
Hi Alessio,
same comment to this patch as in my previous review. Please use git tools to
create and send patches. Patch doesn't apply:
[ste...@stefan-desktop u-boot-ppc4xx (master)]$ git am patches_misc/PATCH\:\
Fixed\ PPC4xx\ compilation\ warning\ in\ 4xx_enet.mbox
Applying: PATCH: Fixed PPC4x
Hi Alessio,
a few general comments to your patch:
Please add "ppc4xx:" at the start of the commit subject and change "PATCH" to
"[PATCH]". The line should look like this:
"[PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed PPC4xx debug compilation error in uic.c"
I really suggest that you use the git tools to create and s
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 10:01:28 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:23 PM
> > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Jean-Christophe
> > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; Ashi
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:23 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Jean-Christophe
> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot
Prafulla,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:35 AM
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
> > Ronen Shitrit
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3][repost] nan
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
> >
> > You just contradicted yourself.
> at91 boards
Ok, I see.
> >
> > The Guard time i
On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
>
> You just contradicted yourself.
at91 boards
>
> The Guard time is the number of empty frames (with control signals
> enabled but no data) t
On 23:08 Mon 22 Jun , Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:35 AM
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
> > Ronen Shitrit
> >
80 matches
Mail list logo
