On 14:04 Mon 22 Jun , Scott Wood wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >no as you add the nand in this patch > >the nand need to be add in a seperate patch, > >this one need to only add the s3c2440 support > >and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer > > If a NAND patch is sandwiched in the middle of other patches that > need to go via an arch tree, and depends on some of those patches, > I'd rather ack the NAND bits to go through the arch tree rather than > try to merge everything separately while still maintaining > dependencies. In that case, keeping the NAND bits in a separate > patch is nice, but not mandatory IMHO. To simplify bisect and merge I prefer to have the nand adding in an other patch
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
