Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/config.h > b/include/asm-arm/config.h index > > 049c44e..5d52f15 100644 > > --- a/include/asm-arm/config.h > > +++ b/include/asm-arm/config.h > > @@ -21,4 +21,8 @@ > > #ifndef _ASM_CONFIG_H_ > > #define _ASM_CONFIG_H_ > > > > +#if defined (CONFIG_KIRKWOOD) > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:21 AM > To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; > Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Ki

Re: [U-Boot] USB to serial support at uboot level

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI, A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Please do not top-post / full quote. (see http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html) In m

Re: [U-Boot] USB to serial support at uboot level

2009-05-04 Thread Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI
Which version of uboot usb2serial is supported? -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:59 PM To: Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] USB to serial support at uboot level Dear Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI, I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:48 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; > Ronen Shitrit > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell MV88F628

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch Driver support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Ben Warren [mailto:biggerbadder...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:12 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; > Ronen Shitrit > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch > Driver

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch Driver support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:43 AM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; > Ronen Shitrit > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61X

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

2009-05-04 Thread Shinya Kuribayashi
Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> We can easily ignore such boards of course, but it would be very nice >>> for U-Boot if it could provide easy configurable drivers and could >>> support as many hardwares as possible. >> Currently it seems that all in-tree boards can be accomodated with the >> construct tha

[U-Boot] Winner

2009-05-04 Thread Joan
Your email ID has been awarded £950.000.00 GBP in our LG Electronics program,Reply this office via: Name: Country:. Sex:. Age: . Address:... ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] Cross-compiling U-Boot on Mac OS X -- can't find crc32.c?

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 04 May 2009 09:27:11 Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Jean-Christophe wrote: > > to compile on Mac OS you will have to move to the laster Mainline , > > What is that? the latest git source tree, not the latest release -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] V2 Add config option for disabling DM9000-SROM support.

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:11:40 Remy Bohmer wrote: > V2: reworked comments from Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD this should be below the "---" marker so that it doesnt show up in the changelog similar comment with subject summary: no need for "1/1", the "v2" should be more in the "[PATCH v2]",

Re: [U-Boot] 1-80 in 6 days 17 hours

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 04 May 2009 12:16:02 nore...@ageofexploits.com wrote: > Great News! i thought the new u-boot list was moderated for unsubscribers ? -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 00:58 Tue 05 May , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <20090504224128.gf13...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > > > > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > > > > > enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090504224128.gf13...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > > > > enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8f20e2996c8fb8e9 > > > > which introduced the usage of UP2OC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090504223746.ge13...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > please move to include/asm-arm/u-boot-arm.h > > > > This change request makes no sense to me. Please leave as is. > all other arm specific init are already store there so for me it's ma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 20:40 Mon 04 May , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <20090504120514.gd25...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > On 12:34 Mon 04 May , Daniel Mack wrote: > > > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > > > enabled. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch Driver support

2009-05-04 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Prafulla, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h > index b73aa8e..932d986 100644 > --- a/include/netdev.h > +++ b/include/netdev.h > @@ -28,6 +28,34 @@ > #ifndef _NETDEV_H_ > #define _NETDEV_H_ > > +/* constants for switch configuration */ > +enum switc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 00:38 Tue 05 May , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <20090504220837.gb13...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h > > > index 30fff7d..9e4b859 100644 > > > --- a/include/common.h > > > +++ b/inclu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090504220837.gb13...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h > > index 30fff7d..9e4b859 100644 > > --- a/include/common.h > > +++ b/include/common.h > > @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ voidpciinfo (int,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> +/* > + * Default values for MPP registers > + * > + * There are maximum 64 Multi-Pourpose Pins on Kirkwood > + * Each MPP functionality can be configuration by a 4bit value > + * of MPP control reg, the value and associated functionality is SoC > + * varient dependent > + */ > +#define MV88F6281

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch Driver support

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> --- a/include/netdev.h > +++ b/include/netdev.h > @@ -28,6 +28,34 @@ > #ifndef _NETDEV_H_ > #define _NETDEV_H_ > > +/* constants for switch configuration */ > +enum switch_cfg_vlan { IHMO in this case it must be mv_swtich . and maybe cover by a defive but I not sure it's the rigth p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KIRKWOOD_EGIGA_INIT > + /* > + * Set egiga port0/1 in normal functional mode > + * This is required becasue on kirkwood by default ports are in reset > mode > + * OS egiga driver may not have provision to set them in normal mode > + * and if u-boot is build

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Detlev, In message you wrote: > > >> to be "simpler and more solid" readb(struct->field) (which is > >> effectively what we have in the current implementation)? You consider > >> "more configurable" to be a good in its own? > > > > Yes. > > Wow. As a rhetorical question - where do you ac

Re: [U-Boot] kb9202/at91rm9200: compiler quirk?

2009-05-04 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
hi jean-christophe, El Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:26:12PM +0200 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD ha dit: > On 20:13 Mon 04 May , Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > i'm trying to do a forward port of the out of tree patches for the > > kwikbyte kb9202b. my board is booting and detects the nand flash

Re: [U-Boot] Ping on Coldfire patch status

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear TsiChung, In message <4791e710007feb4bbf83775d787f462f08915...@az33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> you wrote: > > Yes. I can volunteer for ColdFire. Thanks a lot. Can you please send my your public SSH key, then? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgan

Re: [U-Boot] kb9202/at91rm9200: compiler quirk?

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 20:13 Mon 04 May , Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > hi, > > i'm trying to do a forward port of the out of tree patches for the > kwikbyte kb9202b. my board is booting and detects the nand flash, but > only in certain circumstances. I've never test the nand on rm9200 as the rm9200ek does not have

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

2009-05-04 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote: > >> static unsigned int serial_in(struct uart_8250_port *up, int offset) > > [snip] > >> } > >> > >> to be "simpler and more solid" readb(struct->field) (which is > >> effectively what we have in the current implementation)? You consi

Re: [U-Boot] Ping on Coldfire patch status

2009-05-04 Thread Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP
Wolfgang, Yes. I can volunteer for ColdFire. Best Regards, TsiChung -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 6:11 PM To: Richard Retanubun Cc: u-boot Mailing List; Rigby John-R61273;

Re: [U-Boot] Current status of UBI?

2009-05-04 Thread Matthew L. Creech
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Werner Nedel wrote: > > Should you have to pass the nand offset too? I'm using UBI and my erase > command is: > > nand erase clean 0x0 0x4000 (the start of my nand physical address) > I think it should erase to the end of the device by default. Seems to work t

Re: [U-Boot] Current status of UBI?

2009-05-04 Thread Werner Nedel
Right, I'm being sure to erase it each time before I try "ubi part", just to limit the number of variables. I'm trying to do: nand erase 50 (0x50 is the start of my UBI partition) mtdparts default (assigns 0x50 and up to "root" partition) ubi part root Should you have to pass th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090504120514.gd25...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > On 12:34 Mon 04 May , Daniel Mack wrote: > > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > > enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8f20e2996c8fb8e9 > > wh

Re: [U-Boot] Not able to print env variable added in standalone application

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kartheek N S, In message <23365798.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote: > > I am in need of getting a status message from a standalone application. > Hence I am using getenv and setenv functions. The standalone application can > read the env variable using getenv and set the registers accord

Re: [U-Boot] USB to serial support at uboot level

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI, In message <002101c9cc8f$9db4ef00$d232c...@bnr.st.com> you wrote: > > Is usb to serial support present at uboot level for any ARM architecture? Yes. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Mu

[U-Boot] kb9202/at91rm9200: compiler quirk?

2009-05-04 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
hi, i'm trying to do a forward port of the out of tree patches for the kwikbyte kb9202b. my board is booting and detects the nand flash, but only in certain circumstances. the hwcontrol function looks like this: #define KB9202_NAND_NCE ((unsigned int)1 << 28) /* EN* on D28 */ static void kb9202

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <200905041708.59991...@denx.de> Stefan Roese wrote: > On Monday 04 May 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: ... > > That is a good idea. I haven't thought of performing those tests. Are > > there specific tests I can enable in the U-Boot environment for that? > > Perhaps the memory tests from t

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot -printk kernel crash dump using md on PDK

2009-05-04 Thread Magnus Lilja
Hi 2009/5/4 alfred steele : > Hi Magnus, > >> uImage to. Itried "0x8100" and "0x80008000" and i am still unable >> to load the kernel off u-boot.? > Thanks  for all the help!  I have got  linux booting from u-boot. So > it had something to do with one of the device drivers > Doing a post morte

[U-Boot] Xilinx SPI driver

2009-05-04 Thread Seyyed Mohammad Sajjadi
Hi After searching internet for a good example of using U-boot PPC405 in xilinx FPGAs with only a SPI Flash, and finding nothing, I began writing my own driver. I used a couple of standalone examples besides the linux driver as the base point, and could finally use it. As much as I have teste

[U-Boot] 1-80 in 6 days 17 hours

2009-05-04 Thread noreply
Great News! Progression have finally released their World of Warcraft leveling guide. Level from 1-80 in 6 days 17 hours! Progression comes with a 100% in game addon, floating arrow and much more. I could go on forever but its best if you head over their website and see for yourself! Head over

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2][Net][ppc4xx] Remove support for non-CONFIG_NET_MULTI on PPC4xx EMAC

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 29 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Warren > --- > drivers/net/4xx_enet.c | 54 > net/eth.c | > 4 --- > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) Ben, this doesn't apply against mainline. I

Re: [U-Boot] mtdparts and JFFS2

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 04 May 2009, Renaud barbier wrote: > I have used the new (to me) dynamic partitioning system with JFFS2. > > I have defined one partiton as follows: > mtdids=nor0=boardnor > mtdparts=mtdparts=boardnor:4m(boot) > > After using chpart (chpart nor0,0) successfully I was not able to list > th

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot -printk kernel crash dump using md on PDK

2009-05-04 Thread alfred steele
Hi Magnus, > uImage to. Itried "0x8100" and "0x80008000" and i am still unable > to load the kernel off u-boot.? Thanks for all the help! I have got linux booting from u-boot. So it had something to do with one of the device drivers Doing a post mortem on the printk log buffer pointed me to

[U-Boot] newbie problem.... please help

2009-05-04 Thread Benny k j
Hi, Kindly help me with the following problem: I tried upgrading my uboot and ended up with nothing on my console..pls help I'm having a custom board which is almost a clone of the AT91RM9200DK. Only difference is that I'm having only 2MB of dataflash...rest is the same DataFlash:AT45DB161 Nb

[U-Boot] Hard SPI broken on mpc832x?

2009-05-04 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I get this when compiling on a fairly recent u-boot: mpc8xxx_spi.c: In function `spi_init': mpc8xxx_spi.c:70: error: syntax error before '*' token mpc8xxx_spi.c:76: error: `spi' undeclared (first use in this function) mpc8xxx_spi.c:76: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

2009-05-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Shinya, I see. Actually I was looking a lot at the Linux driver but was hoping that we could away without introducing serial_{in,out}... >>> In my horrible opinion, the combinations of base addres + reg_shift >>> + iotype (char, long, or whatever), are simpler, more configurable, >>>

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Jonathan Haws
> 1) Six boards work, one board fails. > 2) SDRAM chips re-balled on the failing board. > 3) SDRAM failing. > > That sounds like a hardware/assembly problem to me. My bet is a solder > problem. Have you (can you) x-ray the chips and verify the SDRAM > soldering is OK? That was my initial hunch

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Jonathan Haws wrote: >> On Thursday 30 April 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: >>> I am certain that it is a hardware failure that is causing the machine >>> check because I can use the exact same binary on another (identical) >> board >>> and have it boot just fine. That tells me that all the EBC and SD

[U-Boot] mtdparts and JFFS2

2009-05-04 Thread Renaud barbier
I have used the new (to me) dynamic partitioning system with JFFS2. I have defined one partiton as follows: mtdids=nor0=boardnor mtdparts=mtdparts=boardnor:4m(boot) After using chpart (chpart nor0,0) successfully I was not able to list the file embedded in my jffs2 image using the command ls. I

Re: [U-Boot] Current status of UBI?

2009-05-04 Thread Matthew L. Creech
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: >> The goal is to get a single R/W filesystem on a large NAND partition. > > You are aware that the U-Boot UBIFS implementation is (intentionally) > read-only? > Yes, I understand that. Read-only from U-Boot is fine (sorry, should have been mor

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Grant Erickson
On 5/4/09 7:43 AM, Jonathan Haws wrote: >> On Thursday 30 April 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: >>> I am certain that it is a hardware failure that is causing the machine >>> check because I can use the exact same binary on another (identical) >>> board and have it boot just fine. That tells me that al

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Jonathan Haws
> On 5/4/09 8:08 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > > On Monday 04 May 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: > >>> I suggest that you run some stress tests in a conditioning cabinet to > see > >>> if > >>> the other boards don't show any problems. > >> > >> That is a good idea. I haven't thought of performing those t

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Grant Erickson
On 5/4/09 8:08 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Monday 04 May 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: >>> I suggest that you run some stress tests in a conditioning cabinet to see >>> if >>> the other boards don't show any problems. >> >> That is a good idea. I haven't thought of performing those tests. Are >> t

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 04 May 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: > > I suggest that you run some stress tests in a conditioning cabinet to see > > if > > the other boards don't show any problems. > > That is a good idea. I haven't thought of performing those tests. Are > there specific tests I can enable in the U-Boo

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Jonathan Haws
> On Thursday 30 April 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: > > I am certain that it is a hardware failure that is causing the machine > > check because I can use the exact same binary on another (identical) > board > > and have it boot just fine. That tells me that all the EBC and SDRAM > > settings are co

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Jonathan Haws
> I suggest that you run some stress tests in a conditioning cabinet to see > if > the other boards don't show any problems. That is a good idea. I haven't thought of performing those tests. Are there specific tests I can enable in the U-Boot environment for that? We have been using a couple

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 04 May 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: > > From my experience you can't be sure that SDRAM setting are "currect" at > > this > > stage. > > Would that be the case on our other 6 boards then? We have 6 boards that > are up and running with the exact same U-Boot binary file. If there was a > p

Re: [U-Boot] Cross-compiling U-Boot on Mac OS X -- can't find crc32.c?

2009-05-04 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > to compile on Mac OS you will have to move to the laster Mainline , What is that? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] PPC4xx without CONFIG_NET_MULTI

2009-05-04 Thread Ben Warren
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > > I appreciate your help here! As you'll see, I've put together some > > > naive patches to take care of all the boards. I expect I'm missing > some > > > things that you'll notice. > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: timer and interrupt init rework

2009-05-04 Thread Michael Roth
Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > What is "slow clock"? On (some) ARM SoC there are two oscillators: A "slow" free running oscillator typically with a dedicated 32 kHz crystal and the "main" oscillator with a dedicated crystal in the MHz range. The processor starts with the slow slock enabled and init co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:34 Mon 04 May , Daniel Mack wrote: > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8f20e2996c8fb8e9 > which introduced the usage of UP2OCR without defining it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack > Cc: Markus Klotzbueche

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Markus Klotzbücher
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support > enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8f20e2996c8fb8e9 > which introduced the usage of UP2OCR without defining it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack > Cc: Ma

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: unbreak PXA build by defining UP2OCR

2009-05-04 Thread Daniel Mack
U-Boot does not currently build for PXA platforms with USB support enabled. This is due to commit 24e37645e7378b20fa8f20e2996c8fb8e9 which introduced the usage of UP2OCR without defining it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack Cc: Markus Klotzbuecher --- include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h |1 + 1 f

[U-Boot] Not able to print env variable added in standalone application

2009-05-04 Thread Kartheek N S
Dear all, I am in need of getting a status message from a standalone application. Hence I am using getenv and setenv functions. The standalone application can read the env variable using getenv and set the registers accordingly. Based on what is set, I am trying to set some env variable using

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell MV88F6281GTW_GE Board support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
From: prafulla_wadaskar This is Marvell's 88F6281_A0 based custom board developed for wireless access point product This patch is tested for- 1. Boot from DRAM/SPI flash/NFS 2. File transfer using tftp and loadb 3. SPI flash read/write/erase 4. Booting Linux kernel and RFS from SPI flash Review

[U-Boot] [PATCH v9] Marvell MV88E61XX Switch Driver support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Chips supported:- 1. 88E6161 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs 2. 88E6165 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs 2. 88E6132 3 port gbe swtich with 2 integrated PHYs Platform specific configuration supported default and router port vlan config supported Note: This driver is supported and t

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-04 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Kirkwood family controllers are highly integrated SOCs based on Feroceon-88FR131/Sheeva-88SV131 cpu core. SOC versions supported:- 1) 88F6281-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6281_A0 2) 88F6192-A0 define CONFIG_KW88F6192_A0 Other supported features:- 1) get_random_hex() fucntion 2) SPI port cont

[U-Boot] USB to serial support at uboot level

2009-05-04 Thread Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI
Hi, Is usb to serial support present at uboot level for any ARM architecture? Thanks and Regards, Naveen ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] PPC4xx without CONFIG_NET_MULTI

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > I appreciate your help here! As you'll see, I've put together some > > naive patches to take care of all the boards. I expect I'm missing some > > things that you'll notice. > > Thanks. Seems to be fine. I expect that Stefan will complain about

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] esd/common: extend cpld command with address parameter

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 29 April 2009, matthias.fu...@esd.eu wrote: > From: Matthias Fuchs > > This patch adds support for an address parameter to esd's > cpld command. This is in preparation to remove compiled-in > binary cpld (xsvf) bitstreams. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs All 6 patches applied to p

Re: [U-Boot] Current status of UBI?

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > It seems like disabling subpage writes might be the right thing to do, > because once in a while now I _can_ at least attach to a UBI partition > ("ubi part") without error. But it u

Re: [U-Boot] Current status of UBI?

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > Hi, I'm using the latest U-Boot GIT snapshot (4/28), and trying to get > UBI/UBIFS working. I'm wondering what the current status of UBI > support in U-Boot is, and whether what I'm doing will work. Current status: I'm successfully using UBI a

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

2009-05-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: > I am certain that it is a hardware failure that is causing the machine > check because I can use the exact same binary on another (identical) board > and have it boot just fine. That tells me that all the EBC and SDRAM > settings are correct; >Fro

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-i2c.git next branch

2009-05-04 Thread Heiko Schocher
The following changes since commit 6b8edfde22acc574b5532e9f086e6a7287a9bc78: Wolfgang Denk (1): Prepare v2009.06-rc1 are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c.git next Peter Tyser (12): i2c.h: Provide a default CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE value cpci750