i'm using a the taishan board u-boot 1.2.0 and linux 2.4
does u-boot-1.2.0 pass a flatten device tree to the kernel ?
does this even matter ?
also does linux-2.4 expect fdt ?
TIA !
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx
The following changes since commit 81091f58f0c58ecd26c5b05de2ae20ca6cdb521c:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
drivers/serial: Move conditional compilation to Makefile for CONFIG_*
macros
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
G
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> I'd like to known if you're planning to send a pull request for
> the cfi repos.
Will send the pull request shortly.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX
The following changes since commit 8641ff266ae6638da201747c239fd39ba34c4958:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-at91
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Kyungmin Park (1):
Fix OneNAND b
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I don't have hardware to test (and I don't see any in-tree board that
currently uses this), so any help in that regard is appreciated.
cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/nand.c | 64 ++--
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+
Also, fix some minor formatting issues, and simplify the handling of
"state" for writes.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I don't have hardware to test, so any help in that regard is appreciated.
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
board/socrates/nand.c | 84 ++-
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I don't have hardware to test, so any help in that regard is appreciated.
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
board/quad100hd/nand.c | 36 +---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/qua
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I don't have hardware or a toolchain to test, so any help in that regard
is appreciated.
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
board/freescale/m5373evb/nand.c | 64 +++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 46 deletions
Dear "Steven A. Falco",
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following patch adds the ability to call-out from the ide_ident
> routine to a board-specific routine to set the PIO mode of an attached
> device.
>
> This feature is controlled by the preprocessor variable CONFIG_TUNE_CFA.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Not sure if "boot" is the proper word to use in the command definitions
since the downloaded images are only booted if "autostart=yes", and
the majority of board configs don't have autostart set to yes.
I'd vote for changing the descriptions to "lo
The following patch adds the ability to call-out from the ide_ident
routine to a board-specific routine to set the PIO mode of an attached
device.
This feature is controlled by the preprocessor variable CONFIG_TUNE_CFA.
cmd_ide.c is modified to use the "drive identify information" read from the
d
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 16:10 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> Any reason we can't just use go?
>
> - k
Our INTEGRITY images are loaded to address 0x0. We can't relocate the
INTEGRITY binaries there without disabling interrupts first (ppc
boards), which go doesn't do.
Best,
Peter
__
On 15:59 Wed 13 Aug , Scott Wood wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> I don't have hardware to test, so any help in that regard is appreciated.
>
> Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
>
> board/atmel/at91cap9adk/nand.c | 37 ++---
> boa
Hi,
I'd like to known if you're planning to send a pull request for
the cfi repos.
Because There a patch - in your repos - that came from the
SMDK600 patchset.
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.d
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On 23:32 Tue 12 Aug , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This the first series of patch to Move conditional compilation
> > to Makefile.
> >
> > It will introduce the following
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> README |5 +++--
> common/cmd_bootm.c | 39 +++
> common/image.c |3 +++
> include/image.h|1 +
> 4 files changed, 46 insertio
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
README |5 +++--
common/cmd_bootm.c | 39 +++
common/image.c |3 +++
include/image.h|1 +
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index d
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit cd82919e6c8a73b363a26f34b734923844e52d1c:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Coding style cleanup, update CHANGELOG, prepare release
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
I don't have hardware to test, so any help in that regard is appreciated.
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
board/atmel/at91cap9adk/nand.c | 37 ++---
board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/nand.c | 37 ++-
Dear "Prodyut Hazarika",
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_440EP) || defined (CONFIG_440GR) || \
> > >^^ space here^^ space here
> > > defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GR)
>
> > This is not what we are talking about. This part of the
Dear Juergen,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> i tried to test your patch against latest git with "imx31_phycore_config" and
>
> The patch applied without problems but the compilation failed with :
> ..
> ..
> /opt/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.1.0/arm-1136jfs-linux-gnueabi/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks for the clarification. I will change include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h to
tabs and resubmit.
But one more question.
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_440EP) || defined (CONFIG_440GR) || \
> >^^ space here^^ space here
> > defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_44
Hi Guennadi,
> Switch to the standard CFG_HZ=1000 value, while at it, minor white-space
> cleanup, remove CFG_CLKS_IN_HZ from config-headers. Tested on mx31ads,
> provides 2% or 0.4% precision depending on the
> CONFIG_MX31_TIMER_HIGH_PRECISION flag. Measured with stop-watch on 100s
> boot-delay.
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: Prodyut Hazarika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Moved PLB4 Arbiter register definitions to ppc4xx.h since it is shared
> across processors
> Optimize Memory Queue settings for PPC440SP/SPE and PPC460EX/GT/SX processors
>
> Sig
Dear "Prodyut Hazarika",
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I basically moved the defines from include/ppc440.h to include/ppc4xx.h.
> If you go to include/ppc440.h, you will see that the original define was
> aligned
> With spaces. I just followed whatever was it.
>
> Here is the ori
Dear "prodyut hazarika",
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > > But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used for
> > > vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please read the
> > > Coding Style requirements.
> > >
> > > Please do not do this.
>
> The
On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> +/* determine if we have a sub command */
>> +if (argc > 1) {
>> +char *endp;
>> +
>> +simple_strtoul(argv[1], &endp, 16);
>> +/* all of argv[1] wasn
PCI I/O space is currently mapped 1:1 at 0xFA00. Linux requires
PCI I/O space to start at 0 on the PCI bus. This patch maps PCI I/O
space such that 0xFA00 in the processor's address space maps to 0
on the PCI I/O bus.
Signed-off-by Randy Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/freescale/mpc7
Dear Wolfgang,
One more comment.
> > But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used
> > for vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please
> > read the Coding Style requirements.
> >
> > Please do not do this.
I basically moved the defines from include/ppc440.h
Dear Wolfgang,
Please see comments below.
> > But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used for
> > vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please read the
> > Coding Style requirements.
> >
> > Please do not do this.
The problem is that lot of existing code use
Sorry I'm not much help with arch/ppc kernels and u-boot.
In our case we were pulling the mac address from the i2c eeprom so I
don't think it mattered what u-boot would have been passing.
I've only been working with arch/powerpc and u-boot for some time now.
I'll let you know if I see something h
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used for
>>> vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please read the
>>> Coding Style requirements.
>> Where? I see no mention of alignment in the coding
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were used for
> > vertical alignment into spaces. This is incorrect - please read the
> > Coding Style requirements.
>
> Where? I see no mention of alignment in the codin
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
>
> It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the
NAND testing was merged into mainline yesterday, so ARM should be
happy with that
I use ARCH=ppc without devicetree.
i tried the devicetree tool from git.xilinx.com but i don't understand
it right. i miss the .py file in the git-tree ? but this is my next
project :)
because booting without uboot works fine, i dont think there is a
problem with the driver.
i made a new boa
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg Schardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:01 PM
> To: John Linn; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] LL Temac, MAC adresse trouble
>
> Hi John,
>
> i use the kernel from git.xilinx.com (2.6.26-rc6) on a Virtex4FX12
From: Prodyut Hazarika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Moved PLB4 Arbiter register definitions to ppc4xx.h since it is shared across
processors
Optimize Memory Queue settings for PPC440SP/SPE and PPC460EX/GT/SX processors
Signed-off-by: Prodyut Hazarika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Feng Kan <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi John,
i use the kernel from git.xilinx.com (2.6.26-rc6) on a Virtex4FX12
Minimodul from Memec. in this kernel tree is a driver for the lltemac
included.
Georg
John Linn wrote:
> Hi Georg,
>
> Are you writing the LL TEMAC driver yourself or did you get it
> somewhere?
>
> I am working o
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/Makefile |4 +-
>> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/mxc_nd.c | 1172
>> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/mxc_nd.h | 106
>>
>> A question regard
Hi ,
uh, the next error in my u-boot config :)
if i boot my linux-kernel via the xmd-debugger the lltemac has a correct
mac-address and speed negotiating works fine, link comes up and ping works.
booting it with u-boot the mac-address is 0:0:0:0:0:0. i can change the
address with ifconfig eth0
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Jens Gehrlein wrote:
> Hi,
> in nand_spl/nand_boot.c in function nand_read_page() one can read the
> comment in the case of ECC errors:
> "No chance to do something with the possible error message from
> correct_data(). We just hope that all possible erro
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:37:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> This change seems to be completely unrelated to above described
> changes, so if it was a valid modification, it would have to be split
> off into a separate commit.
>
> But then, you are changing good TAB chanracters that were use
Hi,
in nand_spl/nand_boot.c in function nand_read_page() one can read the
comment in the case of ECC errors:
"No chance to do something with the possible error message from
correct_data(). We just hope that all possible errors are corrected by
this routine."
Why can't we do anything? If an unc
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
>
> It is based on the nand/testing branch, so, they will not apply to the
> ARM tree, not without pulling the nand tree first. Or, even if they will
> apply, i
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:11:29PM +0200, Jens Gehrlein wrote:
> in the directory nand_spl/board one can find three subdirectories: amcc,
> freescale and samsung, which contain the reference boards of these
> vendors. These vendors are CPU vendors, too.
>
> When I want to add a new board, shall
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
> > probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
>
> SMD6400 is ARM code, so
Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
> probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
SMD6400 is ARM code, so it must come from the ARM custodian.
Best regards,
Wolfg
Hi,
in the directory nand_spl/board one can find three subdirectories: amcc,
freescale and samsung, which contain the reference boards of these
vendors. These vendors are CPU vendors, too.
When I want to add a new board, shall I create a board's vendor
directory directly in nand_spl/board, or
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch should be applied after SMDK6400 is merged, which will,
probably, get in with the nand tree. Please comment any objections:-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0cab77a..343393c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAIN
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:06:33AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> nand.c: In function 'at91cap9adk_nand_hwcontrol':
> nand.c:47: error: 'NAND_CTL_SETCLE' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> nand.c:47: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> nand.c:47: e
I'm also looking for feedback on the fact that OS specific code looks
like to allow sub-commands to do 'PREP' and 'GO' that are OS specific,
while maintaining the full 'bootm' functionality.
We assume the user handles doing 'BODY' via other sub-commands/
commands (like bootm initrd, bootm fdt
On Aug 13, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> + /* determine if we have a sub command */
> + if (argc > 1) {
> + char *endp;
> +
> + simple_strtoul(argv[1], &endp, 16);
> + /* all of argv[1] wasn't a number, assume its a sub command */
> +
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Got rid of unique boots command and just made sub commands part of bootm.
- k
common/cmd_bootm.c | 106 +++-
include/image.h| 12 +++-
lib_ppc/bootm.c| 201 +---
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Alemao wrote:
> Now i got all NAND stuffs from u-boot-1.3.4, including common/cmd_nand.c
> and drivers/mtd/nand/*, but still the same problem.
>
> Other components of u-boot can influence NAND behavior?
>
> I saw some people with similar problem using "nand scrub", but
When I had discovered that my NAND flash had all bad blocks, I found a
patch to dump the NAND blocks (which I think you had said you did). What
I found in my case was that on one board 8 data lines were disconnected
and on another one of the 0 ohm resistors was faulty (so one bit was
always read as
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Prodyut Hazarika wrote:
> > > Here you move 44x specific code from a 44x specific header file into a
> > > 4xx generic header file which requires you to add a 44x specific
> > > #ifdef's.
> >
> > These defines are also used on the 405EX (and possibly future 405
> > vari
Now i got all NAND stuffs from u-boot-1.3.4, including common/cmd_nand.c
and drivers/mtd/nand/*, but still the same problem.
Other components of u-boot can influence NAND behavior?
I saw some people with similar problem using "nand scrub", but im little
bit afraid with this command...
Another th
> >
> > It would be nice if the commit messages contained at least a minimal
> > explanation of the reasons for the changes.
>
>Yes, the original comment from Prodyut is gone. Please add it again.
The original comments got omitted by mistake. I will resubmit it again.
> > > +#define plb1_bearl
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 12:31 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>
>> Hi Kumar,
>>
>> I'm on the road this week, so my ability to review code this week is
>> suboptimal. Having said that, this looks good!
>>
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> [PATCH 01/15] Update linux bootm to support ePAPR cl
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 08:34 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> > On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> >> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI supp
Hello!
Remy Bohmer schrieb:
> Nice! and it is still called a bootloader?
Yes.
> It is getting a OS on itself ;-)))
I don't think so. Such discussions and requests have been seen several
times on the U-Boot mailing list. U-Boot has neither something like a
scheduler nor other typical features,
On Aug 13, 2008, at 12:31 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I'm on the road this week, so my ability to review code this week is
> suboptimal. Having said that, this looks good!
>
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> [PATCH 01/15] Update linux bootm to support ePAPR client interface
>> [PATCH 02/15
Hi Axel,
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:56:57PM +0200, Axel Beierlein wrote:
>
>> does U-Boot support the Boot Count Limit functionality for a MPC5200?
>
> AFAIK no.
>
>> My last information was that is only supported for MPC8xxx and MPC82xx PPC.
>
> Not quite, e.g. a quick grep turns up support for
Dear Remy,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > U-Boot now exceeds 1.5 millions lines of code.
>
> Nice! and it is still called a bootloader? It is getting a OS on itself ;-)))
;-)
> > [1] See http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/UbootStat_1_3_4 for full
> >statistics, and http://www.d
On 11:06 Wed 13 Aug , Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> > U-Boot now exceeds 1.5 millions lines of code.
>
> Nice! and it is still called a bootloader? It is getting a OS on itself ;-)))
>
> > [1] See http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/UbootStat_1_3_4 for full
> >statistics, and http:/
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swarthout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello Wolfgang,
> U-Boot now exceeds 1.5 millions lines of code.
Nice! and it is still called a bootloader? It is getting a OS on itself ;-)))
> [1] See http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/UbootStat_1_3_4 for full
>statistics, and http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/ReleaseCycle
>for links to statis
Hi everybody,
U-Boot v1.3.4 has been released and is available from the git
repository and the FTP server.
The Merge Window for the next release is open until August 30, 2008,
i. e. 17 days remaining.
The next release is scheduled for October 18. I hereby contradict all
claims that I'm secretly
Hi Magnus,
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/Makefile |4 +-
> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/mxc_nd.c | 1172
> > cpu/arm1136/mx31/mxc_nd.h | 106
>
> A question regarding the placement of the mxc_nd.c file: Shall SoC
> NAND drivers be placed in drivers/mtd/nand
Hi
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Imported from Freescale's Linux NFC driver from the i.MX31 BSP
> release 5 (Linux 2.6.22.5) and the i.MX31 PDK BSP (Linux 2.6.24).
>
> The code has been changed to conform (better) with the coding style
> in Linux/U-boot.
70 matches
Mail list logo
