Scrive Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I renamed ICS-V6 files to have ICS files clearly identified. The consequence
>
> is that all source code using the component must be updated to change file
> names in their uses clause.
This will not a big problem when it generate an error at compil
Scrive Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Once V6 beta is accepted, I will remove old code conditionnally compiled and
>
> start adding new features using compiler features not available in older
> compilers.
Can you say some that are not available on D5?
(Note: this is a real question and
Scrive Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I plan to support Delphi 7, Delphi 2006 (Win32 and .NET) and C-Builder 2006
> only.
> Any tought ?
I'm still using D5. I planned to migrate to D7 but probably this will not
happen before middle 2006 because lack of time, and maybe at that time I wil
Hello,
I traced the bug until the message:
The message number is 1025 and it appears to be WM_HTTP_REQUEST_DONE on the
call stack.
Then I noticed that it is happening just when the TIME_WAIT sockets reach the
limit (which should be something like 2000 in my measurement). At this point
when t
Hello Francois,
> I wonder if I should also change all class names. For example rename
> TWSocket to TOverbyteIcsSocket or TIcsSocket. This way, ICS component would
> be clearly identified.
True.
> This of course would require a lot of changes in
> existing applications, including in dfm.
No th
Hello Francois,
> I consider .NET just like Win32 was a few years ago: this is defenitely
> Windows's future. No choice. It is better to prepare sooner than later.
I have same opinion to prepare at time.
>> While D2006 does seem stable, I feel it's far to early for professional
>> developers to
> Have you installed Delphi 7 update #1 ?
Yes, years ago.
> I consider .NET just like Win32 was a few years ago: this is
> defenitely Windows's future. No choice. It is better to prepare
> sooner than later.
When Microsoft believes .NET is sufficiently versatile, fast and stable
for applica
Hello Francois,
> Delphi 5 is really too old.
I know. But it's just as good, or better (smaller executable
size and smaller memory footprint) than Delphi 7. I really
like Delphi 5. And ICS works equally well on D5 as on any other
versions of Delphi. It's a pity to drop it.
> Delphi 2005 is too s
[OT]
> I migrated from Delphi 6 to 7 recently, and have had several complete
> compiler lock-ups, causing me to lose actual work, something that never
> happened under Delphi 6.
Have you installed Delphi 7 update #1 ?
> And why does ICS need to support .NET?
> Is there actually a demand from any
> I wonder if I should also change all class names.
Yes, definitely allow v5 and v6 to co-exist without messing around
enabling and disabling packages all the time to maintain old projects.
> > I prefer use Delphi 6 instead Delphi 7 but I think it
> > should theorically work without
>>> TWSocketV6 sounds good for example so in the future you will be able
>>> to have TWSocketV7, TWSocketV8 ...
> OK so TWSocketICS ?
Not better. A component name need a prefix, not a suffix.
TIcsSocket or TIcsWSocket or TOverbyteIcsSocket or...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To
> I even didn't knew Delphi 2006 existed :-)
Now you know !
> The last "stable" version
> for me is Delphi 6, Delphi 7 has lot more bugs
I do not agree. Delphi 7 is very stable for me (there is one update).
> and I don't talk about Delphi 2005 that's why I stopped being
> interested in any n
Hello Francois,
OK so TWSocketICS ?
>> TWSocketV6 sounds good for example so in the future you will be able
>> to have TWSocketV7, TWSocketV8 ...
FP> I don't like this idea. On of my main rules when developing component is to
FP> preserve existing code.
FP> V6 would break that rule but only onc
> I prefer use Delphi 6 instead Delphi 7 but I think it should
> theorically work without changes isn't it ?
With the current code, it would probably work with all 32 bit compilers
(Delphi 2 and up). But for making the code work with .NET without too much
conditional compilation, I nee
Hello,
I even didn't knew Delphi 2006 existed :-) The last "stable" version
for me is Delphi 6, Delphi 7 has lot more bugs and I don't talk about
Delphi 2005 that's why I stopped being interested in any new Delphi
version...
What do you like in Delphi 2006 ? may be I'll have a look if you thin
> TWSocketV6 sounds good for example so in the future you will be able
> to have TWSocketV7, TWSocketV8 ...
I don't like this idea. On of my main rules when developing component is to
preserve existing code.
V6 would break that rule but only once between V5 and V6. Later versions
will preserve t
Arno Garrels sent me a fix for proxy authentication in the HTTP client
component.
I have updated ICS-V5 and ICS-V6 betas on my website with the changes.
--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or c
> I use Delphi 5 and Delphi 2005, neither is on your supported list :(
Delphi 5 is really too old.
Delphi 2005 is too slow and too buggy compared to Delphi 2006 which seems so
far to be as good as Delphi 7 but has much more features.
> Will V6 be completely replacing V5, or will it be a branch l
> I tried to Install both packages but there are some problems like
> "THttpClient class already exists".
>
> Keeping both may be usefull to be able to open old V5 applications and
> also new V6 ones.
You can simply select/unselect the packages from hte component/install
packages menu. Just a lit
> Maybe I missed: why do you need to rename?
I said: "This way, ICS component would be clearly identified."
The idea is really to have better naming convention. To start on better
basis.
My idea is to release V6 for the 10th ICS birthday which is in april 2006.
This release would break the mai
Hello Francois,
I prefer use Delphi 6 instead Delphi 7 but I think it should
theorically work without changes isn't it ?
FP> I plan to support Delphi 7, Delphi 2006 (Win32 and .NET) and C-Builder 2006
FP> only.
FP> Any tought ?
FP> --
FP> Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www
Hello Francois,
I use Delphi 5 and Delphi 2005, neither is on your supported list :(
Will V6 be completely replacing V5, or will it be a branch like SSL?
--
Best regards,
Jack
Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 9:22:59 AM, you wrote:
> I plan to support Delphi 7, Delphi 2006 (Win32 and .NET) and C
Hello Francois,
TWSocketV6 sounds good for example so in the future you will be able
to have TWSocketV7, TWSocketV8 ...
FP> I renamed ICS-V6 files to have ICS files clearly identified. The
consequence
FP> is that all source code using the component must be updated to change file
FP> names in t
Hello,
I tried to Install both packages but there are some problems like
"THttpClient class already exists".
Keeping both may be usefull to be able to open old V5 applications and
also new V6 ones.
FT> Maybe I missed: why do you need to rename? Why would one person need to
FT> install both v5 an
Francois PIETTE wrote:
> I plan to support Delphi 7, Delphi 2006 (Win32 and .NET) and C-Builder 2006
> only.
> Any tought ?
Reasonable.
Seems good to me.
--
Marcello Vezzelli
CTO
Software Development Department
E-Works s.r.l.
tel. +39 059 2929081
fax +39 059 2925035
Direzionale 70 - Via Giard
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: [twsocket] ICS-V6 files and classes naming
...
> I wonder if I should also change all class names. For example rename
> TWSocket to TOverbyteIcsSocket or TIcsSocket.
I plan to support Delphi 7, Delphi 2006 (Win32 and .NET) and C-Builder 2006
only.
Any tought ?
--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
I renamed ICS-V6 files to have ICS files clearly identified. The consequence
is that all source code using the component must be updated to change file
names in their uses clause.
I wonder if I should also change all class names. For example rename
TWSocket to TOverbyteIcsSocket or TIcsSocket.
> Here small compare with my server
> 100 connected users
> 200 connected users
Have tried to reach the max number of connected users ?
The number should be much much higher now, at least if you have enough RAM.
Previously, you reached the max number of windows (1) before reaching
the max soc
> It was already in the small sheet V5/V6 is ICS used version.
>
> FP> Hidden windows are user objects. Since their number is drastically
> reduce,
> FP> the number of user objects are reduced. Would be interesting to
> compare
> FP> figures with ICS-V6 and with previous version.
Sorry, read too
If you were talking about SetWindowLong, then yes, the fix was implemented
since the beginning.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://
Hello,
It was already in the small sheet V5/V6 is ICS used version.
FP> Hidden windows are user objects. Since their number is drastically reduce,
FP> the number of user objects are reduced. Would be interesting to compare
FP> figures with ICS-V6 and with previous version.
--
To unsubscribe or
> It seems to greatly reduce number of USER Objects
Hidden windows are user objects. Since their number is drastically reduce,
the number of user objects are reduced. Would be interesting to compare
figures with ICS-V6 and with previous version.
> but general Handle value stay high.
Nothing
> Does this version includes my fix in WSocket?
Which fix ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] ICS V6 beta avail
Hello Francois,
Here small compare with my server
100 connected users
V5 V6
Handles: 350352
Threads: 4 4
USER Obj: 14242
GDI Obj: 49 46
200 connected users
V5 V6
Handles: 649652
Threads: 4 4
USER Obj: 24254
GDI Obj: 49 46
It s
Does this version includes my fix in WSocket?
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 7:14 PM
Subject: [twsocket] ICS V6 beta available
> ICS V6 beta available for download from ICS web pasge.
>
> This version
All messages are handled differently ! All message numbers are now variable
instead of constant since a lot of component use the same hidden window and
each one need to have his own messages.
Each message number is allocated dynamically. See how
TCustomWSocket.AllocateMsgHandlers works.
--
Co
Hello Francois,
WM_TRIGGER_EXCEPTION is no more available in WSocket.pas ?
seems you removed also
WM_ASYNCSELECT= WM_USER + 1;
WM_ASYNCGETHOSTBYNAME = WM_USER + 2;
WM_ASYNCGETHOSTBYADDR = WM_USER + 3;
WM_CLOSE_DELAYED = WM_USER + 4;
WM_WSOCKET_RELEASE
Yes, I forgot to add IcsDefs.inc to the zip file.
You can use the file which is part of ICS.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Dod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] ICS
Hello Francois,
I tried to install but it says THttpCli class already exists so I
removed old ICS and just added INCDEFS.INC (and IcsMD5.pas I need)
that seems to be the minimum to install V6 package.
Regards.
FP> ICS V6 beta available for download from ICS web pasge.
--
To unsubscribe o
Why don't you use the Dir/list command and then parse with Davie's code?
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: [twsocket] TFPClient1 (determinign whether to put or appendfile)
I've go a Client App that sends
Hello Francois,
Great !
By the way, I did a mistake in :
>> Following my previous mail, here is the answer of a question I
>> asked many times in the mailing list.
Please understand " a question I SAW many times in the mailing list"
and not "I asked" :-)
regards.
FP> See the new ICS V6 be
42 matches
Mail list logo
