Scrive Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I renamed ICS-V6 files to have ICS files clearly identified. The consequence > > is that all source code using the component must be updated to change file > names in their uses clause.
This will not a big problem when it generate an error at compile time. A problem could be for people that will not delete the old dcu's. > I wonder if I should also change all class names. For example rename > TWSocket to TOverbyteIcsSocket or TIcsSocket. This way, ICS component would > be clearly identified. This of course would require a lot of changes in > existing applications, including in dfm. Certainly yes, and this is not a funny work to do. You forget to mention all inherited components. > What do you think ? I'm not fully against, I say 60% keep the actual naming. But if it is really necessary please avoid long prefixes :-) Bye, Maurizio. ---------------------------------------------------- This mail has been sent using Alpikom webmail system http://www.alpikom.it -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
