-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm new to this list (and the jasper code), so please let me know if I've
submitted this incorrectly.
I was doing some profiling of the server side environment that I work on
and noticed that quite a bit of time was being used in the JSP engine. After
further investigation I notice
st Regards,
>>nKiran
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
*
* jre/bin/server/Xusage.txt *
**
**
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Not sure, to be perfectly honest. Maybe some of the other developer can
> answer that properly.
&g
equired. I look forward to your feedback.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
> Duncan, I looked at your patch carefully, looks like Remy's work on
> jasper2 already addressed the issues that you are trying to solved.
> In fact, Remy only creates a compiler for the container, whereas you
> would have
; production systems. I've committed a patch which does that.
>
> That way, loadJSP can use 0% and everything stays very simple.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
Duncan McLean
Hummingbird Ltd.
613-548-4355 x1539
http://www.hummingbird.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Begin forwarded message:
> From: John Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri Apr 27, 2001 06:26:04 AM US/Pacific
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: tomcat and ISPs
>
> Hi Duncan,
> I'm writing you just because you were the first name on the "wh
ename. This would
make it clear that one tree is the -DEV tree, another is the -STABLE one. I
dunno, just a thought?
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
crapping the use of JAXP --
esp since two implementations of the parser and the impl of the transform
engine is under the ASF license. Or should we just hard code the
dependencies and not let people choose which parser to use?
--
James Duncan Davidson
rom the 3.2.1 source distribution that he or she
> grabbed off the web site.
Branches cause headaches even for long term project people. There's lots of
people that have been working for a very long time on Apache. They use this
new repository model, and have fo
, and reuse it in
> a non-Apache product that does a fancy GUI interface? The Apache
> license allows (encourages!) this, but the JAXP license does
> not, right?
What I'm saying is that you can redist the jaxp.jar file containing the
classes of the implementation. That's what we n
why the JAXP JSR community wishes
> to remain a PITA in this matter. It should follow the lead of the servlet
> JSR. What's particularly puzzling about this to me is that the enlightened
> individual that took that JSR fully open source leads the JAXP JSR...
I don't get t
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-- Forwarded Message
From: James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17
n. :)
Just FYI -- I hate being silent for too long.. :)
Also, if anybody in Dublin/Prague/NYC would like to get together and chat,
my schedule may permit such meetings (over beer of course!). Send me private
mail if you are interested and we'll see what can happen.
.duncan
--
J
ecision guidelines (or amend them if needed) for a vote
> on a Release Plan. I want to avoid a "Florida recount situation",
> where the rules are being made up while the votes are counted ;-)
Agreed. I don't want to debate about hanging chads.
--
James Duncan Davidson
hat Craig meant that they were in Pier's checked out
sandbox. As to why Pier hasn't been checking in code more often, that's a
different story.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's something that needs to happen with the XML project. However PMCs are
given a fair amount of latitude currently by the ASF to run things how they
perceive best. Given that, it's hard to tell.
You should bring this up on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
uot; +1.
My reading of the situation is that if you vote +1, that's a commitment to
help, not just support of the plan. Support of the plan is a +0.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's akin to what I've
been told that as PMC chair, I have to put my opinions aside. That of course
is utter bs. If you're on the PMC, it's because you are supposed to *have*
an opinion.
--
James Duncan Da
th your postings, I probably would have flamed him a bit for that... As
far as other people reprehending you, well, that's their business.
> I wanted to see how far this could go.
I get the feeling that we have people "playing chess" with this sort of
thing. I'm not happy abo
get out the Saran wrap and wrap up his hand.. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-
To unsubscr
welcome
to do so.. :) Or whatever else. I personally can make sure that
teleconferences happen. That's about it. For other kinds of collaborative
efforts, others are going to have to step forward.
--
James Duncan Davidson
voicing it here, or to him
personally, is the appropriate thing to do. Or if you want the PMC's charter
expanded, that's something that can be discussed.
--
James Duncan Davidson[
feedback to Jim's
mail -- and I also figured that if you really wanted to call in, you'd do so
anyways. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
---
On 1/22/01 4:16 PM, "Geoff Soutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, sounds reasonable. Maybe I ought to be asking how do we protect the
> people that get offended? :-)
Those who need to be protected shouldn't walk outside their front door.
nt not only to helping with the release,
>> but to provide maintenance support beyond the release.
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with this. What if I want to state my approval,
> but don't want to help out?
+0 it.
--
Ja
on 2/7/01 5:12 PM, Marc Saegesser at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any bug introduced by a code change since Tomcat 3.2.1 was released MUST
> be fixed. If it worked in 3.2.1 it will work in 3.2.2.
"no regressions" I think is the term that you are looking for.
--
James Dunc
es).
At least that's my two cents from having been around the class loader block
a few times.
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
-
To unsubscri
rote a JSR-ignition document but the 'javac' team sucked
> it, well, I don't know anything about it.
I'll check up on this.
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
--
istic.
There was very high interest at the time that this was percolating around,
but if Bill M. has now left, well... Then its a staffing concern. Rgh. I'm
still digging, so...
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/
keep their competitors to figure out how they get better performance. :)
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
http://x180.net/ !try; do();
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2/27/01 7:57 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now, since Forte/NetBeans is now part of Sun, I believe that the best way to
> go is to have the two teams to talk together (not really easy as I know
> you're in Czechoslovakia and we are in California :)
>
t anybody
implementing servlets is required, by "accepting" that license to follow
it. At least the way the license is designed.
Do not assume that I agree with the way things are -- I'm just reporting
my understanding of the way things are set up.
.duncan
o request that both sides draw a line, stay to their
side of the road, do their thing, and figure out what they want to say at
that meeting.
James Duncan Davidson
Jakarta PMC Chairman
ostin (it sure looks so from
> his postings).
>
> In fact, Jon is the only person trying to turn this into a lousy Costin
> versus Craig war.
Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting.
--
James Duncan Davidson
led classes, things
should be ok.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
tributed to the ASF -- and the ASF accepts, it's *much*
better to check in a .jar file. Very much cleaner from a legal standpoint.
--
James Duncan Davidson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/28/00 11:29 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting.
>
> Can non-PMC members like myself attend this ?
Yep. It wi
On 12/29/00 4:33 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Duncan. I am in a different time zone and I reply to mails by the
> date order they were sent. (That is how you got a batch of replies from
> me altogether.)
Cool enough. I should have been a bit c
On 12/29/00 12:04 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea, it denied my Berkeley, CA address at one point. :-)
Yep. No way to map IP's to physical location except by top level ISPs -- and
then only sortof. :)
.duncan
-
27;t mind getting splatted in a pinch, or that you won't do
anything more than annoy if it goes splat (loosing a shopping cart even is
annoying, but not totally reprehensible as long as you have 99.9% updtime).
Data that has to be preserved has to go into a database or an EJB. Anything
invo
hine that is not totally tweaked out and running under
heavy load. Moving the performance hit around works until your site gets
pounded every time your company's commercial gets played during the
super-bowl :)
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson
42 matches
Mail list logo
