On 1/20/01 11:56 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed, James. I don't really see anyone question Jon's contributions to ASF
> or to open source, in general. Jon is prolific and that's great. But many
> posts from Jon "cross the line" and are harrassment. A small bit of toning
> down would go > a long way.
I should have been more clear -- legally defined harassment. Threats to body
or property come to mind. Stalking. Not being a lawyer I don't know what
else the ASF could be considered to be liable for (and of course it depends
on what a jury thinks), however in my opinion it has to be this serious for
official action to be taken. After all, it seemed clear to me that the PMC's
role was too narrowly defined to include "niceness overseers".
If you have a beef with Jon's behavior, then voicing it here, or to him
personally, is the appropriate thing to do. Or if you want the PMC's charter
expanded, that's something that can be discussed.
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
